Faux "News" is disputing New York Times Benghazi report

[spanone]

Deadly Mix in Benghazi: False Allies and Crude Video

The reality behind the attack on American outposts in Libya is murkier and more complex than initially believed, but months of investigation turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda had any role in the assault.

http://international.nytimes.com/


'AL QAEDA-LED EVENT': The Benghazi attack's many ties to terror group

CONTRARY TO THE FINDINGS of a New York Times report that local militias were responsible for the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, statements by House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., and reporting by Fox News indicate that Al Qaeda was behind the deadly assault.

http://www.foxnews.com/

[anti partisan]

1. To be completely honest, I don't trust either corporate media source.

But I trust one way, way less.

[trumad]

2. I trust reporters who took months to investigate--IE: the NYT

over a bunch of talking heads who checked nothing.

[anti partisan]

4. Well, that goes without saying (nt)

[Lifelong Dem]

10. I love it

They don't believe the NYT's. Now they know how we feel about Faux News all the time.

[spanone]

3. the murdoch organization lives in a world of it's own. they create their own news.

and their idiot audience believes every word.

[anti partisan]

5. I like Jon Stewart's moniker - Bullshit Mountain. Describes it to a T. (nt)

[Enthusiast]

16. Because it's a mountain of bullshit.

It really is.

[Gothmog]

6. Fox News is also disputing the science on climate change

No one should be surprised that Fox News has problems with facts and reality

[spanone]

7. i love their reasoning:'reporting by Fox News indicates that Al Qaeda was behind the deadly assault'

so if they report it, it MUST be true

[Berlum]

13. Fox propaganda (R) is doubling down on their lies

[spanone]

14. my local newspaper has this story on PAGE 11. nothing to see here...move along

[DCBob]

8. They would dispute the earth is round if it would make Obama look bad.

Faux Newz.. unfair and unbalanced.

[spanone]

9. they have an entire year invested in benghazi bullshit. MANY ties to terror????

Last edited Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:28 AM - Edit history (1)

they only double down when caught in the crosshairs

[UTUSN]

11. R#3 & K for, I was going to start a thread asking how the NYT report was dominating (not)

Yaaas, a year and three months of wingnut "Benghazi-Benghazi-BENGHAZI" is OVER, correct??????? Of course not!1

*********QUOTE********


http://nypost.com/2013/12/29/pol-blasts-times-report-that-al-qaeda-not-behind-benghazi/
[font size=5]
Pol blasts report that al Qaeda not behind Benghazi (Rep. Peter KING, Rethug-NY)[/font]


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/29/house-intelligence-chair-benghazi-attack-al-qaeda-led-event/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+foxnews/politics+(Internal+-+Politics+-+Text)&utm_content=My+Yahoo

[font size=5]House Intelligence chair: Benghazi attack 'Al Qaeda-led event' (Rep. Mike ROGERS, Rethug-MI) [/font]

[font size=5] [/font]

[font size=5] [/font]


*************UNQUOTE******

[spanone]

12. darrell issa was on meet the press and basically doubled down on the 'al qaeda' bullshit

[UTUSN]

15. So far nothing on Reliable Sources but why should there be on a show about media coverage?!1 n/t

[malaise]

17. Fugg Fox

All lies all the time

[bluestate10]

18. What is new? Next CBS will broadcast it's expose. nt

[rufus dog]

19. What Fox News Foreign Correspondent is contradicting this?

Oh it is just repukes and local talking heads with a bias.

That is the point I plan to make to any ignorant faux news watcher.

Embarrass them, they are taking news from a source that doesn't spend money on foreign correspondents, only on biased talking heads.

There is no point debating, they need to know that their ignorance is laughable.