Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 06:19 AM Dec 2013

Ancient burial box claimed to have earliest reference to Jesus

For 2,000 years, pilgrims and archaeologists have hunted for physical evidence of Jesus and his family, without success.

But now an ancient burial box claiming to contain the earliest reference to the Christian saviour is about to go on public display in Israel after its owner was cleared of forgery. It has not been seen in public since a single, brief exhibition in Toronto in 2002.

The modest limestone burial box, known as an ossuary, is typical of first-century Jerusalem, and is owned by Oded Golan, an Israeli antiquities collector. Chiselled on the side are the words "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus."

James the Just was the first leader of the Christians in Jerusalem after the Crucifixion. He was executed for apostasy by the local rabbinical court.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/25/burial-box-earliest-reference-jesus

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ancient burial box claimed to have earliest reference to Jesus (Original Post) dipsydoodle Dec 2013 OP
OK, Oded Golan the "discoverer" of this box has been found not guilty of forgery intaglio Dec 2013 #1
So Jesus' name is really "Jimmy"? Boy, that's gonna go over big. But it might work in the South. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2013 #2
Nice try, intaglio Dec 2013 #3
Oh, no no no. I grew up in one of those churches. Then escaped. jtuck004 Dec 2013 #5
Jimmy !!? Berlum Dec 2013 #4
Whole wheat Jimmies? Ya'akov's Smackers? Gonna have to work on branding... n/t jtuck004 Dec 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #10
Yup, Jimmy Big Balls itsrobert Dec 2013 #11
Actually, it's Josh. dawg Dec 2013 #12
Walk into any crowd in the Arab world and yell "Hey, Muhammad!" MADem Dec 2013 #7
Jimmy, Joe, Jesus, Jordan, Justin, Moe Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #8
Oy gevalt! MineralMan Dec 2013 #9

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
1. OK, Oded Golan the "discoverer" of this box has been found not guilty of forgery
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 07:24 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Thu Dec 26, 2013, 08:08 AM - Edit history (1)

But as the judge confirmed that did not mean he did not forge it only that it had not been possible to prove. Golan was still guilty of trading illegally in antiquities. When arrested it was found he had a workshop with tools and half finished antiquities but no evidence he passed off what was made as original.

The inscription is in 2 parts, the first is the unexceptional "Ya'akov bar-Yosef" (James son of Joseph) and has a certain depth of cut the second (and controversial) "akhui diYeshua" (brother of Jesus) has another. Israeli antiquities experts believed that there was also a difference in patination between the two parts of the engraving although defenders of the authenticity claim that this analysis is inaccurate as that part of the inscription might have been cleaned and conserved.

Next comes context. Ossuaries like this were used in the 1st century CE but it was most unusual (indeed unknown) for a brother's name to be inscribed. In this inscription the whole is placed asymmetrically with the "akhui diYeshua" making it seem so misplaced; if only the "Ya'akov bar-Yosef" is considered the symmetry is much better. The argument of the believers is that the second element of the inscription was added only after it became apparent how important Jesus was - except that, biblically, Jim died a lot later than Jesus and any contemporary fame Jesus had was already established and if added, say, 10 years on would have meant disturbing the dead after final interment a seriously big no-no in 1st Century Judea.

Lastly there is the problem of the names, those 3 used were 3 of the commonest names is 1st century Judea; it would be like having a grave inscribed "Jim son of Joe brother of John," only far more likely as there was a much smaller range of names available to Judeans.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
2. So Jesus' name is really "Jimmy"? Boy, that's gonna go over big. But it might work in the South. n/t
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 08:27 AM
Dec 2013

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
3. Nice try,
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 08:49 AM
Dec 2013

James was the name reduced to the familiar "Jim" because the ossuary is supposedly the ossuary of James the Elder, in legend the brother of Jesus.

The parallel I made was between John and "Jesus" (Yeshua).

Try telling the Southern Baptists that Jesus was not "The Lord's" name and that St James was Ya'akov, that will be fun.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
5. Oh, no no no. I grew up in one of those churches. Then escaped.
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 08:58 AM
Dec 2013

Jimmy was gonna be bad enough. Someone tries Ya'akov, and I can already visualize them getting out the white sheets and oiling up the torches...long before they even figure out who the target is gonna be.

Response to jtuck004 (Reply #2)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. Walk into any crowd in the Arab world and yell "Hey, Muhammad!"
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 01:39 PM
Dec 2013

Dozens of people will turn and think you're calling out to them!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ancient burial box claime...