General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you believe that one of the sexes is morally superior to the other?
I am not going to define morally superior - just using your own sense of what is right and wrong, judge.
Bryant
9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
One sex is clearly better than the other | |
1 (11%) |
|
One sex is somewhat better than the other | |
0 (0%) |
|
Both sexes are morally about the same | |
5 (56%) |
|
I refuse to participate in this bullshit ambush poll | |
1 (11%) |
|
I refuse to participate in this bullshit poll (bullshit for some other reason than ambush) | |
1 (11%) |
|
I like to vote | |
1 (11%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Iggo
(47,568 posts)But I do believe that I'm morally superior to people who do.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Fascinating.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)firsttimer
(324 posts)men , women and especially screaming toddlers of parents who won't shut them up.
treestar
(82,383 posts)in order to make keeping in their place a little more palatable.
firsttimer
(324 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)And pretty old too! Good for the BBC.
firsttimer
(324 posts)I hope all the DU female members understand I posted this in fun.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Damn you!!!
RIP Brent. I fully admit I didn't give that guy enough props when he was alive.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)...I used to roll my eyes, groan, and head to the john when they would come out of some insane jam into his lullabye song.
Little did I know many years later I would sing my kids to sleep with it, every night.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That which one society may find moral, another may not.
Certainly humans are more moral than wild animals, so it can be said those with a more wild animal nature are less moral than those citified.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Just look at statistics on violent crime. Women, on average, are more empathetic, kinder, less violent, more self-sacrificing, more sympathetic, and friendlier than men.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Not really, no. I've met good and bad of both, and in general, men and women are pretty much the same for most of those traits.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)Empathy would be a function of the theory of mind, which is to say our ability to put ourselves in anther's shoes. Understanding the desires of others would be an application of the golden rule, a fundamental principle of morality.
That leaves open the question - are women more empathetic than men? I see no evidence to suggest that.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)To see things from their point of view and to appreciate that your desires aren't necessarily greater than their needs. Without empathy other people are just tools to be used or debris to be cleared away; with empathy you understand that everybody matters in their own way.
Bryant
rrneck
(17,671 posts)sorry about that. Here is the updated post.
Empathy would be a function of the theory of mind, which is to say our ability to put ourselves in anther's shoes. Understanding the desires of others would be an application of the golden rule, a fundamental principle of morality.
That leaves open the question - are women more empathetic than men? I see no evidence to suggest that.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)There are too many violent women and peaceful men. Too many women who want nothing to do with children, and men who are dying to be fathers.
It will be nice to see if we can actually stop imposing gender bullshit on children. Then we will see your suspicion proven incorrect.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)more devisive chaos on this forum?
God damn this shit is getting fucking old!
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)seattledo
(295 posts)Remember who started all of the wars.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)who profited from them without having to fight in them.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)no - I don't think there is moral superiority of either sex - Both sexes tend to express both their better and darker sides differently - One tends to express both positive and negative more directly and the other tends to express both positive and negative less directly.
MADem
(135,425 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I have known pretty heartless, cruel women in my 65 years. I have also known wonderful, compassionate men who would run rings around those women.
It just depends on the the individual. You cannot label an entire gender as being this or that.
ismnotwasm
(42,014 posts)PM Martin
(2,660 posts)Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)both do bad. Is the way it is and probably always will be that way
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)women are more moral (especially if they're over 30)
By Kathryn Knight
PUBLISHED: 19:17 EST, 15 April 2012 | UPDATED: 19:17 EST, 15 April 2012
36
View
comments
Morally superior: Women over 30 were found to be more moral than men
Morally superior: Women over 30 were found to be more moral than men (file photo)
In the battle for the moral high ground, it seems we have a winner at last.
A leading philosopher has claimed that women are more moral than men.
Professor Roger Steare developed the Moral DNA test four years ago to measure both a persons morality and the changes in their value systems when they enter the workplace.
Since then 60,000 volunteers have taken the questionnaire in more than 200 countries, ranging from chief executives to manual workers and housewives.
Professor Steare said the results show that your gender and age are most likely to influence your morality with women and the over-thirties proving the most moral.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2130291/Why-women-moral-especially-theyre-30.html#ixzz2oY1Qzezx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)From the article -
They then have to evaluate assertions about themselves, such as I always honour peoples trust in me and I am good at exercising self-control. Those taking part then receive a report naming them as one of six personality types Philosopher, Judge, Angel, Teacher, Enforcer or Guardian.
This is a self reporting personality profile and has nothing to do with genetics beyond MoralDNA in the trademark. It appears "professor" Steare is a "corporate philosopher".
Roger is also an acknowledged expert in the development and delivery of transformational Leadership, Corporate Culture and Ethics programs globally for organisations such as HSBC, BP, PwC and Cass Business School.
This guy sounds more like a motivational speaker than a philosopher. I wouldn't put too much stock in what he says, or the DailyMail for that matter.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)There's a big difference between filling out bubbles on a survey and real actions. I wonder if the study took gender socialization into account and how it would affect the responses?