General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenator Seeks Saggy Pants Ban In N.Y.C. Schools
New York State Senator Eric Adams is fed up with seeing male youths walking around with low slung or sagging pants that exposes their underwear. Consequently, Adams is currently lobbying for a resolution to adopt a ban against wearing droopy pants in New York City public school classrooms, reports the New York Post.
-snip-
The citys controversial Mayor Michael Bloomberg, however, has made mention of the fact that he is not in favor of policing dress codes. Senator Adams, on the other hand, thinks that the mayor just doesnt care to get it. In the society he hangs out in, they dont sag. They laugh at people that sag. And they just say, Those are the people well never hire, who will never date our children. In the universe that he lives in, sagging is not an issue. Would he hire someone that comes in the building sagging? Would he employ them to run his corporation? Would he bring them into City Hall? Its tolerable to him because hes removed from that universe.
-snip-
http://newsone.com/newsone-original/ruthlogan/state-senator-seeks-saggy-pants-ban-in-n-y-c-schools/
I must be getting old, but I agree with this.......
Richardo
(38,391 posts)Best quote from the entire campaign IMO.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)They can't afford belts and they can be provided.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)It may look stupid, but that's not a good enough reason for a law. Remember, your own generation no doubt did a lot of things that your elders thought looked stupid and you should stop doing too.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I have seen boys with their pants almost past their butt, exposing most of their undershorts. And I am not a prude. In my younger years, I dressed very provocatively, but at least, I did not show my underwear.
montanacowboy
(6,093 posts)which is hard to disagree with
I work in employment & training, on the welfare to work program, and you cannot believe how people dress and they think an employer will hire them looking like that. And it has NOTHING to do with the amount of money they have or otherwise, they just don't get it. We have to counsel them on what to wear and what is totally inappropriate. Something they should have learned long ago.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)has lasted for more than ten years. By the mid-1980s those of us who wore silly shit in the 1970s had moved on, and the "kids" had their own new things.
we can do it
(12,189 posts)really, its been clown pants for about 20 years now.
RZM
(8,556 posts)It comes from prison culture. It's not uncommon to be issued clothes that don't fit right and no belt. In such circumstances you've got no choice but to sag. For some reason, it eventually caught on in the streets too.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Yeah, that's classy. Bet it's gonna work out real well when you go and apply for a job. Nothing says "I have aspirations to improve myself" like dressing as if you were in prison.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)I oppose school dress codes unless it can be proven that the forbidden apparel is a direct threat to good order and discipline. I don't see that here.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)When they could regulate outside the school. Actually, I would think neither is really possible. But if they can consider it indecent exposure that might work.
But they should encourage more pant sagging to help make it easier to catch idiotic criminals.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and the end game always ends up being school uniforms....
freshwest
(53,661 posts)And the practice of baggy pants probably deprives heavy people from buying the size clothes that would not fall off.
Just sayin'
earthside
(6,960 posts)I'm pretty tolerate and liberal about things like dress, hair, etc., especially in real life day-to-day.
But even I do have to wonder about saggy pants, rings in noses and lips, and tattoos on necks. (Why do people have their names put on their necks? So everyone knows who they are? Or do they have self-esteem issues?)
How do these folks hope to get a good job?
Or do they?
Especially at any kind of business that serves the general public.
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)I think it's the dumbest looking fashion statement ever, and a potential problem in many social settings, but I don't think we need laws to enforce school dress codes.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)not take that very well. They are after all emulating prisoners, gang members, etc.
I could get away with a lot better since I am not white, but white guy in a business suit could have a real problem if it did it in the DC Metro or a shopping mall.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)and I don't disagree that students shouldn't wear them. But, it is kind of a silly law. We would have to have some kind of cut off as to what is too saggy. Then we could regulate how tight clothes are ect.. slippery slope I think.