General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"My Facebook Note Re: Phil Robertson"
by Jaxpagan
Aside from actually catching occasional snippets, I've never watched Duck Dynasty, despite being from that state, and that part of the state, and that town (Monroe, La). Or maybe because of that - I grew up with people like them, and I saw this "flip-side" of the folksy humor a long time ago. Kinda done with it.
But after Phil Robertson spewed all over his GQ interview, my Facebook page (which carries an amazing diverse array of people, at least for the moment) came alive with posts on one side or the other, and I thought I had to respond to it all.
<...>
To Mr. Phil Robertson:
So much to go through here lets start with the race thing, since that seems to be the most recent dustup:
To say you never saw a Black person mistreated in the Deep South in the 50s and 60s, is genuinely astounding. Youre talking about people who couldnt vote, walk in the wrong part of town, drink from the wrong fountain, sit down in a diner, or show inadequate deference to any white trash idiot no matter how poor or stupid he was. Youre talking about people with few if any genuine rights who were consigned to those fields because they were actively excluded from anything else. You saw nothing but Black people being mistreated, and just because you never saw some white guy actually standing over them and beating them with a chain is no excuse to play dumb about it.
Ive never really watched your show, so I dont know much about your outlook beyond what youve unfortunately shared with the class in the GQ interview, but I come from the same place as you, Chief, so Im pretty sure I know your type and Im willing to bet I know which side of the Obama-Tea Party divide you fall on.
And given the Tea Party tendency to hysteria about tyranny, apocalyptic ranting about that armed revolt that well may be necessary to take our country back and just general bitch-whininess about every stitch of the Social Safety Net, or every minor act of the public sector to, you know, actually deal with our national problems . . . then for you to say that Blacks in the pre-Civil Rights South - people who were actually oppressed, actually persecuted, actually denied representation in the government that controlled their destiny and actually restricted in life by law, social convention and the ongoing threat of violence - if they occasionally sang or joked to lift their spirits, or didnt just break down sobbing in the goddam fields over their miserable lot in life, then they must have been happy as clams . . . makes you a fucking idiot.
And as for that mountainous spew of bile about gays . . .
The Bible uses the same word toevah (literally taboo) to describe eating shellfish and wearing mixed fibers. Im guessing youve never protested a Red Lobster, or complained that the cotton-poly blend in your hunting camo violated your faith. So Im going to guess your Bible defense for your homophobia is so much bullshit. Im going to guess you dont go around thinking I sure would love to embrace and welcome my gay brothers and sisters, but the Bible just wont let me.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/20/1264135/-My-Facebook-Note-Re-Phil-Robertson
Beautiful smack down.
Warpy
(111,339 posts)Couldn't have said it better, myself, and we had exactly the same type in NC.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)But then, Jesus wasn't scared of hanging around with prostitutes, either.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Not enter restaurants and theaters to name a few. I have seen abuse of whites on poor blacks. A & E needs to stand strong and put an end to the duck dynasty.
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)the like, means that he saw mistreatment every fucking day. He knew black folk had a completely different set of rules about where they could eat or sleep and that if they looked at a white woman the wrong way they end could end up swinging on a rope. And he couldn't have missed the fact that the people doing the lynching rarely were meted out justice for their crimes, if done against a black man. Or that little black children weren't allowed to go to the same schools as his nasty white ass.
I don't know who the fuck that moron thinks he is kidding when he trots out examples of a black person singing and smiling as proof that they were happy. A&E needs to be ashamed that they ever elevated this racist homophobic bible thumping pig to a minor celebrity status.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)I don't see a clear attack on Blacks or any ethnic group. He's relaying his recollection of his personal life as he remembers it.
That it doesn't match what someone else would like it to is no basis for attack.
This whole thing makes the Left look ugly and petty.
This guy isn't arguing for stoning gays or a return to slavery. What the hell? Really, that is the unspoken conclusion if you buy into the "he's a hateful bigot and must be destroyed" movement, stumbling as it goes.
I don't see a reason to go after him at all.
The momentum is on Phil's side. The support is on his side. This is Chick-fil-A 2. Nobody's buying the fauxrage, including some prominent gays, but outrage on the other side is surging. And that says a ton.
Pantagruelsmember
(106 posts)New tapes out today show Phil going all out homophobic, he's toast or should be.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)countryjake
(8,554 posts)http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/21/us-duckdynasty-idUSBRE9BK01720131221
(Reuters) - "Duck Dynasty" reality TV personality Phil Robertson, who has been suspended from the hit show for making comments condemning homosexuality, made similar remarks in a religious speech given two years before the series began its run on cable network A&E.
The speech posted on video-sharing website YouTube in February 2010 shows Robertson addressing a supper at Berean Bible Church in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, and condemning homosexuals in the 45-minute talk that touched on the U.S. Constitution and secularization of American society.
"They (homosexuals) committed indecent acts with one another," said Robertson, clad in his usual camouflage, in the video posted on the church's YouTube page, which has drawn fresh attention in the wake of Robertson's suspension from one of the most-watched shows on cable television.
"And they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion," he added. "They're full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant God haters. They are heartless. They are faithless. They are senseless. They are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/19/phil-robertson-homophobic-2010-sermon_n_4475546.html
TMZ posted a video Thursday of Robertson unleashing an anti-gay sermon on a crowd at Pennsylvania's Berean Bible Church's Wild Game Supper in 2010. In the video, the Duck Commander king can be seen dressed in camouflage, thumping a Bible, talking about sexual deviants and the lack of morality in America.
"First they say, 'There is no God. Get him out of your mind,'" he said in a rambling speech. "Then they bow down to birds, animals and reptiles, and each other. And the first thing you see coming out of them is gross sexual immorality. They will dishonor their bodies with one another, degrade each other. Uh, is that going on in the United States of America? Look around. God's not there... And boy is there some immorality going on around here. Does it get worse?"
"Women with women, men with men, they committed indecent acts with one another, and they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversions," Robertson continued. "They're full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant, God-haters. They are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil. That's what you have 235 years, roughly, after your forefathers founded the country. So what are you gonna do Pennsylvania? Just run with them? You're doing to die. Don't forget that."
In GQ, he uttered similar sentiments when he said homosexuality is a sin and likened it to bestiality. Still, he insists that as a Christian he does not judge.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,192 posts)countryjake
(8,554 posts)so one could surmise that he figured changing his costume wasn't necessary for his trip up to Pennsylvania.
Half of his schtick is selling the image he presents.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)Still think it's "fauxrage"?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)If I missed that, then that changes things, but what I read was him recalling his early years. I didn't see any praising of slavery or inequality.
Do you have a quote of this "praising?"
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)before they had civil rights... How can anyone defend that in any way, shape or form?
Maeve
(42,288 posts)Yeah, the whole problem was when they got the idea that they were owed the same rights he took for granted...entitlement, that's the problem! Man calls himself "white trash"; while I object to the term, that may be the one thing I'd let slide--he knows himself.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I don't see a clear attack on Blacks or any ethnic group. He's relaying his recollection of his personal life as he remembers it. "
...of course you don't. I mean, you're defending him so clearly you don't.
"The momentum is on Phil's side. The support is on his side. This is Chick-fil-A 2. Nobody's buying the fauxrage, including some prominent gays, but outrage on the other side is surging. And that says a ton."
Hooray for bigots, homophobes and racists!
Who knew that being critical of these assholes was "fauxrage"?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)Your post is extremely ugly. You're pretending that saying black people were happier pre-civil rights movement is not an attack? He's a hateful bigot because he likens gay sex to bestiality.
I can't believe a DUer is defending the bigot like you are. If you think the outrage over his comments is not genuine, then you are mixing with completely the wrong kind of people. And you're not reading DU well.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)That it doesn't match what someone else would like it to is no basis for attack.
This whole thing makes the Left look ugly and petty.
This guy isn't arguing for stoning gays or a return to slavery. What the hell? Really, that is the unspoken conclusion if you buy into the "he's a hateful bigot and must be destroyed" movement, stumbling as it goes.
I don't see a reason to go after him at all.
The momentum is on Phil's side. The support is on his side. This is Chick-fil-A 2. Nobody's buying the fauxrage, including some prominent gays, but outrage on the other side is surging. And that says a ton.
~ posted by Skip Intro
After you've watched the "sermon" Robertson delivered (posted in one of my other replies to you), please, come back and explain to me how any conscientious person could NOT be outraged by the things he preaches.
Do you honestly believe that it's "ugly and petty" to confront such disgusting hateful bigotry?
What exactly do you think he means by asking, "So what are you gonna do Pennsylvania?", what is the unspoken conclusion to such a question?
Also, please expound on your final sentence in that post. What do you think it means (a ton?) that the outrage coming from the other side is surging
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)It was quite a culture shock. I remember at the court house there were two water fountains. The signs were long gone, but it was an unwritten rule which was which.
TeamPooka
(24,254 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)butthead back on the show to the cheers of the idiots that watch.
I wouldnt be surprised if this wasnt a total put up from the beginning.
Cha
(297,655 posts)fucking phil robertson!
thank you, ProSense!