General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSarah Palin - Free speech means you can say any stupid, racist, hateful, homophobic thing you want
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/sarah-palin-duck-dynasty-defense-101319.html
Sarah Palin says the suspension of one of the stars of the show Duck Dynasty over recent anti-gay comments he made is an attack on free speech.
Palin re-posted a picture of her meeting with the stars of the A&E show on her Facebook page Wednesday night, writing that intolerants were behind the suspension of the shows patriarch, Phil Robertson.
Free speech is an endangered species. Those intolerants hatin and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us, Palin wrote.
...
--------------------------
Free speech also means other citizens can call you out for every stupid, racist, hateful, homophobic thing you say.
gort
(687 posts)The stoopid. It burns.
Demobrat
(8,980 posts)Even if it is stupid, racist, hateful, and/or homophobic. Because then I know what I'm dealing with. Better that than a smile to my face and a knife in my back.
This guy is absolutely entitled to his opinion, and the network is absolutely entitled to kick his ass out if it causes their viewers to change the station.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)TV producers, private companies, and families can place limits on what a person is allowed to say without consequences.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Duck Dynasty guy insults LGBT community and African Americans, Sarah defends free speech.
This is why Republicans aren't allowed to have Presidents anymore.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Sarah. So, only bigots and racists are tolerant?
Blue Owl
(50,414 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)of speech both in and outside of the workspace. The Dick from Duck Dynasty can go piss up a rope. Personally, I think corporations should be bound by the Constitution when it comes to all individual liberties, especially freedom of speech, but they aren't.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Gothmog
(145,313 posts)Unless there is a governmental entity involved in the censorship decision, the First Amendment does not apply. The First Amendment only applies to censorship done by a federal, state or local governmental entity and does not apply to private parties such TV networks. This is basic constitutional law.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)then teach my pig to dance.
Gothmog
(145,313 posts)Here is a brief explanation of this requirement from Cornell Law School http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/state_action_requirement
The state action requirement stems from the fact that the constitutional amendments which protect individual rights (especially the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment) are mostly phrased as prohibitions against government action. For example, the First Amendment states that [c]ongress shall make no law infringing upon the freedoms of speech and religion. Because of this requirement, it is impossible for private parties (citizens or corporations) to violate these amendments, and all lawsuits alleging constitutional violations of this type must show how the government (state or federal) was responsible for the violation of their rights. This is referred to as the state action requirement.
While this is simple by my standards, I doubt that Palin will be able to understand this concept
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)MiniMe
(21,717 posts)Sarah, your employer has the right to get rid of you for any stupid, racist, hateful, homophobic thing that you say.