Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
124 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Moore all over the NY Post 911 Saudi story. (Original Post) Kingofalldems Dec 2013 OP
Release the 28 pages... KansDem Dec 2013 #1
Should Be #1 Story billhicks76 Dec 2013 #16
Why do you hate Obama? NealK Dec 2013 #72
Lol billhicks76 Dec 2013 #124
Release the Kracken* Berlum Dec 2013 #76
never mind that SADDAM IS BUYING YELLOW CAKE FROM NIGER EVERYBODY RUN!!!!! leftyohiolib Dec 2013 #2
AGAIN!1!! Wilms Dec 2013 #4
I'm sorry-- Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #104
If this turns out to be true Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #3
Bro, that happened when the Supremes allowed Bush to steal the White House. nt riqster Dec 2013 #5
+1 joeybee12 Dec 2013 #6
And we were told to "Get over it" mikeysnot Dec 2013 #9
AND called "Sore Losermen." Why are we not returning that nice little favor now? calimary Dec 2013 #12
I do. mikeysnot Dec 2013 #15
Sad but true. riqster Dec 2013 #75
I agree mikeysnot Dec 2013 #85
My father was that way. It is hard. riqster Dec 2013 #91
How about this? Dyedinthewoolliberal Dec 2013 #42
Now shut up and look forward, not backward. NealK Dec 2013 #73
I prefer to look both ways. mikeysnot Dec 2013 #86
The one that landed on the Moon didn't need stinking wings. NealK Dec 2013 #90
Don't forget we were also told we would, "Look forward." Enthusiast Dec 2013 #95
Yep skydive forever Dec 2013 #10
Welcome to DU, skydive forever! calimary Dec 2013 #70
And don't forget how they tried to stop theaters from showing Fahrenheit 9/11, some even sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #97
+1000000000 Jamastiene Dec 2013 #55
Move along Maynar Dec 2013 #63
Amen. calimary Dec 2013 #71
Me too. riqster Dec 2013 #77
So that they could then carry Enthusiast Dec 2013 #94
There is no doubt in my mind that treason has been committed. But knowing that and being rhett o rick Dec 2013 #47
"If this turns out to be true", LOL Corruption Inc Dec 2013 #50
Nixon committed treason, Reagan committed treason rurallib Dec 2013 #83
Right! freebrew Dec 2013 #84
NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!1111 Not according to the authorities. Octafish Dec 2013 #96
"Are you kidding me?" L0oniX Dec 2013 #100
From the NYPost Article: KoKo Dec 2013 #7
Good points.. 2banon Dec 2013 #27
Ha! I LOVE the source! LTR Dec 2013 #29
Good point, hadn't thought of that angle. 2banon Dec 2013 #35
CS Monitor had excellent coverage of Osama's escape from Afghanistan with 1600 al Qaeda Ace Acme Dec 2013 #56
Yes, I remember that story 2banon Dec 2013 #68
Do you this can get HUGE. Omg heads will roll SummerSnow Dec 2013 #110
And don't forget about the expedited visas of most of those 15 Saudis... dougolat Dec 2013 #64
Hallilburton is salivating to invade and get ahold of *that* oil! Roland99 Dec 2013 #8
It wasnt in 9/11 Commission Report, It didnt happen! Geeez mitty14u2 Dec 2013 #11
We were hired guns for the Saudis when Saddam invaded Kuwait... KansDem Dec 2013 #13
Our country supplies the "hired guns" for all major corporations. We are no longer sovereign. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #48
Just like a Banana Republic with bombs. nt adirondacker Dec 2013 #54
Not only that, Ambassador April Glaspie gave the Green Light to Saddam's invasion of Kuwait. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #57
Paul Sperry responds cal04 Dec 2013 #14
Wow! .. nt dougolat Dec 2013 #65
What's in this for Murdoch? nt HomerRamone Dec 2013 #17
Being the "next Bob Woodward". 99th_Monkey Dec 2013 #25
Rupert Murdoch, of Fox News fame HomerRamone Dec 2013 #39
ah missed that. thanks for the correction. ~nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2013 #44
That's the same question that I have been pondering. watoos Dec 2013 #93
Forcing Obama to come out and defend it. JoeyT Dec 2013 #99
I had a very similar thought. Raine1967 Dec 2013 #118
I think this will be a "look forward to the future" kinda thing. MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #18
Come on Snowden! Release the intel supporting this report. I'm sure the NSA has/had it riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #19
I wonder if he had already sent that out to the Guardian /NYT etc.. and they're sitting on it. 2banon Dec 2013 #38
The editor of The Guardian OnyxCollie Dec 2013 #53
Of course it isn't their current focus. Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #78
Dare we hope to ever know the truth? mountain grammy Dec 2013 #20
But But...... Pharaoh Dec 2013 #21
I tweeted him the link to the NYPost story (which I found here on DU) Triana Dec 2013 #22
Good job. Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #30
Michael was the first one to point to the connection in Fahrenheit 9/11. And he was boo'ed at the Cleita Dec 2013 #23
While Bush held hands and strolled down lover's lane Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #33
According to one reporter Howard Dean suggested that GWB had advance knowledge of 9/11 Ace Acme Dec 2013 #59
Damn, is he stoned, drugged or drunk in that clip. n/t Cleita Dec 2013 #62
When you lie that blatantly and publicly about something so important, it shakes the soul Berlum Dec 2013 #79
Indeed, was he? n/t LittleGirl Dec 2013 #88
Go MM!! Shout it from the fucking rooftops. ~nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2013 #24
KnR! Holly_Hobby Dec 2013 #26
No it hasn't cpwm17 Dec 2013 #40
Were you here shortly after 9/11? Holly_Hobby Dec 2013 #87
It came up a lot back then. Blue_Adept Dec 2013 #112
and that's why we invaded iraq and afghanistan... spanone Dec 2013 #28
Also interview today with Bob Graham on Huffpost on same topic. madfloridian Dec 2013 #31
Dupe...slow DU Reload..ignore KoKo Dec 2013 #34
That was worth listening to, thanks. There have been other postings with Senator Graham speaking out 2banon Dec 2013 #37
Shut up all you nutty conspiracy wackjobs NightWatcher Dec 2013 #32
Tammy, please tell me it is not true that high-ranking officials of our government were party to indepat Dec 2013 #36
Watching the news all night and not a peep. Fawke Em Dec 2013 #41
k/r solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #43
I cant imagine that the CT posse isnt all over this thread. rhett o rick Dec 2013 #45
Let's Say That There Was Some Sort Of Cover-Up By BushCo....... global1 Dec 2013 #46
Sadly that's not the real concern. It's not R v D. It's 1% v 99%. None of the elite will give rhett o rick Dec 2013 #49
Watch out for the RightWingers' old standby: OMG, it's gay marriage!!!! nikto Dec 2013 #69
I don't think it is a plausible assumption Enthusiast Dec 2013 #105
OK - I'll Buy That - So If That Is The Case - How Will Repugs And Repug Talking Heads..... global1 Dec 2013 #113
They always try to deny and discredit any criticism. First they attack the messenger. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #115
First they ignore the message. Maybe the cowering media will leave it alone. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #117
MM is amazing. Just when I think he goes too far, turns out he's right. applegrove Dec 2013 #51
You know, we STILL sell those motherfuckers loads of advanced weapon systems every year TroglodyteScholar Dec 2013 #52
We have to pay our debt to China somehow. :/ nt adirondacker Dec 2013 #58
Cheney's secret energy summit; Iran Contra; Erupting for 2014 & 2016. And M$M still sucks. n/t freshwest Dec 2013 #60
K & R AzDar Dec 2013 #61
K&R Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #66
One last observation, if I may... KansDem Dec 2013 #67
They all make me sick. NealK Dec 2013 #74
K&R n/t Feral Child Dec 2013 #80
If a kid had robbed a liquor store and somebody got killed... Jerry442 Dec 2013 #81
Yeah? Enthusiast Dec 2013 #106
Wonder who shorted American Airline stock previous to the attack? eom Ligyron Dec 2013 #82
The last I heard, no one has come forward to claim the money yet. RC Dec 2013 #98
someone needs to leak these documents so we can see the truth cbdo2007 Dec 2013 #89
The Bush Administration Enthusiast Dec 2013 #92
... SammyWinstonJack Dec 2013 #103
Most Americans do not care. dotymed Dec 2013 #101
"Smirk." - xCommander AWOL Bush (R) & Intimate Oil-Bud Bandar Bush (R) Berlum Dec 2013 #102
Does this mean we can have Enthusiast Dec 2013 #107
I thought Nicholas Brody did it all. tclambert Dec 2013 #108
What is Murdoch's angle in all this? CJCRANE Dec 2013 #109
Nobody followed the money … afraid of where it would lead to? Vox Moi Dec 2013 #111
One step closer to justice for 9/11 victims. nt raouldukelives Dec 2013 #114
old news... madrchsod Dec 2013 #116
You are sadly correct LiberalLovinLug Dec 2013 #121
Kick this alfredo Dec 2013 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Dec 2013 #120
Michael actually demonstrated the BFFE-Saudi-911 link Carolina Dec 2013 #122
As another poster put in this thread--we need to see those 28 redacted pages Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #123
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
2. never mind that SADDAM IS BUYING YELLOW CAKE FROM NIGER EVERYBODY RUN!!!!!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 04:47 PM
Dec 2013

terror color code red alert !!!!

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
9. And we were told to "Get over it"
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 05:51 PM
Dec 2013

by the same people that cannot accept the fact the Obama WON two elections outright.

calimary

(81,429 posts)
12. AND called "Sore Losermen." Why are we not returning that nice little favor now?
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 06:38 PM
Dec 2013

Why does no one call these bastards "Sore Losermen" - and throw it back in their faces? Especially since they've earned it?!?

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
15. I do.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 06:52 PM
Dec 2013

I said that to my parents and it went over their head? 2k memories....

I was like, I am going to give you the same advice you parroted off of Hannity in 2001, "get over it!"

I really don't think they remember, and it is not old age.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
75. Sad but true.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 06:54 AM
Dec 2013

Wingnuts are such blinkered idiots, they cannot see a connection between the two cases.

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
85. I agree
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 10:38 AM
Dec 2013

it is tough cause it is my parents.


My mother was going on about how thank god for Medicare and SS for helping my 94 year old grandmother out.

I looked at her and was like "Those damn socialist programs taking money from me and giving it to someone else..."

Blank stare. sad, but true.

calimary

(81,429 posts)
70. Welcome to DU, skydive forever!
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 03:58 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Glad you're here. And yep indeed. He was never anything other than resident bush to me. And nobody covered the uproar about the inaugural parade that day that was stopped by protesters asserting the election was stolen. My husband and I went to see "Fahrenheit/911" and were so outraged. As we walked to the parking lot I said - "do you remember seeing ANY coverage of that on Inauguration Day? ANY at all?" He didn't. I sure didn't either. OUTRAGED!!!! And yeah, they called us Sore Losermen and said we should shut up and get over it.

Well, I think they oughta wear that around themselves, now. And until the end of President Obama's second term. THEY need to shut up and get over it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
97. And don't forget how they tried to stop theaters from showing Fahrenheit 9/11, some even
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:38 AM
Dec 2013

threatening to blow up theaters if they showed it. MM was vilified and threatened for making it and had to hire bodyguards to protect his family. But I don't recall any arrests of those issuing those threats.

People were nervous going to the theater to see it.

And I won't forget how some on the Left joined in the vilification of MM, which is how I used to know they were not Democrats and the beginning of the infiltration, online, of Left forums.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
94. So that they could then carry
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:31 AM
Dec 2013

out the 911 operation, the Iraq War and the Wall Street operation. And they had FUN torturing "suspects". What do you bet Cheney was DIRECTLY involved in the torture.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
47. There is no doubt in my mind that treason has been committed. But knowing that and being
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:23 AM
Dec 2013

able to do something about it are different. Until the masses figure out they are being fucked, we will continue this crap.

 

Corruption Inc

(1,568 posts)
50. "If this turns out to be true", LOL
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:41 AM
Dec 2013

There's so much evidence that's been proven over the last 12 years it's impossible to even remember it. Start with a search for "Coleen Rowley", throw in a search for "Sibel Edmonds" and the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, then try to remember the entire WMD propaganda campaign that was a result of 9/11.

"If it turns out to be true", LMFAO!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
96. NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!1111 Not according to the authorities.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:34 AM
Dec 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024183809#post4

Which is an odd POV, considering how hard some work or spend their free time to "figure out" the motives of DUers.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024176773#post17

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. From the NYPost Article:
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 05:07 PM
Dec 2013
Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup

by Paul Sperry


Is the federal government protecting the Saudis? Case agents tell me they were repeatedly called off pursuing 9/11 leads back to the Saudi Embassy, which had curious sway over White House and FBI responses to the attacks.

Just days after Bush met with the Saudi ambassador in the White House, the FBI evacuated from the United States dozens of Saudi officials, as well as Osama bin Laden family members. Bandar made the request for escorts directly to FBI headquarters on Sept. 13, 2001 — just hours after he met with the president. The two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony while discussing the attacks.

---
Astonishing as that sounds, few lawmakers in fact have bothered to read the classified section of arguably the most important investigation in US history.

-----
As the frustrated Joint Inquiry authors warned, in an overlooked addendum to their heavily redacted 2002 report, “State-sponsored terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more ­lethal attacks within the United States.”

Their findings must be released, even if they forever change US-Saudi relations. If an oil-rich foreign power was capable of orchestrating simultaneous bulls-eye hits on our centers of commerce and defense a dozen years ago, it may be able to pull off similarly devastating attacks today.

Members of Congress reluctant to read the full report ought to remember that the 9/11 assault missed its fourth target: them.

-----------
Paul Sperry is a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of “Infiltration” and “Muslim Mafia.”
Filed under9/11, Censorship, CIA, George W. Bush, National Security, September 11, Terrorism



 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
27. Good points..
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:55 PM
Dec 2013

unfortunately this source would be considered dubious at best by many on the left. I'm not familiar with Paul Sperry, but he hails from the Hoover Institute? and it was published in the NY Post.. too bad it wasn't published in the NYT or the Washington Post. (I know, I know)

It does seem like I just read a piece in the NYT supporting this report, however. (if memory serves)

LTR

(13,227 posts)
29. Ha! I LOVE the source!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:35 PM
Dec 2013

Show any mouth-breathing Obama hater this, then tell them where it came from. I love using RW news sources to call them on their bullshit. I also like using sources that people THINK are RW but really aren't (i.e. Christian Science Monitor, which is pretty straightforward).

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
35. Good point, hadn't thought of that angle.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:20 PM
Dec 2013

I've never thought the Christian Science was right wing per se. Always had a straight up approach from anything I've ever read published by them. That said, it's always an article that was mentioned elsewhere, never think about CS as a go to, first stop source.. hmm, maybe I should look at them more closely, come to think of it.

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
56. CS Monitor had excellent coverage of Osama's escape from Afghanistan with 1600 al Qaeda
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:21 AM
Dec 2013

One of their journalists in a hotel lobby in Jalalabad overheard local warlords (the ones hired by the US military to guard the trails from Tora Bora to Pakistan) selling letters of transit to al Qaeda representatives.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
68. Yes, I remember that story
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 03:41 AM
Dec 2013

there were other similar stories at the time, CS were pretty much doing excellent journalism at the time.. but to speak to the matter of the death of Osama bin Laden, (Dec 2001) was reported at the time and repeated by Benazir Bhutto in an interview during her run for President (Pakistan) just before she was assassinated. It wasn't a common narrative obviously, but that report was referenced from time to time, by people who was likely in the position to know. Mysterious.

dougolat

(716 posts)
64. And don't forget about the expedited visas of most of those 15 Saudis...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 02:43 AM
Dec 2013

...double agent material, doncha know?

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
57. Not only that, Ambassador April Glaspie gave the Green Light to Saddam's invasion of Kuwait.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:25 AM
Dec 2013

She told him "We have no interest in your border disputes".

http://warisacrime.org/content/april-glaspie-cable-green-light-gulf-war-one

cal04

(41,505 posts)
14. Paul Sperry responds
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 06:50 PM
Dec 2013

UPDATE- Paul Sperry responds: “Unger and Moore have their own agendas. mine aligns with the FBI WFO case agents and FCPD* detectives who say they’ll never forgive the Bush admin for throttling their investigation of leads back to Saudi Embassy and Bandar himself in McLean. they view the former POTUS as a traitor.”

http://www.showbiz411.com/2013/12/15/murdochs-nypost-today-backs-michael-moore-bush-saudi-claims-from-fahrenheit-911

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
25. Being the "next Bob Woodward".
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:30 PM
Dec 2013

Could retire for life as desired, or go stellar professionally.

not a bad payoff really, if he doesn't get "suicided" for his efforts.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
93. That's the same question that I have been pondering.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:29 AM
Dec 2013

I can't come up with a reason. The New York Post is a Republican propaganda machine. Have the Saudis stepped on someone's toes? Will this limit the Saudis influence, because that's all I see coming out of this? For this story to grow legs the M$M will have to get behind it and I don't see the corporate controlled media doing that.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
99. Forcing Obama to come out and defend it.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:53 AM
Dec 2013

Linking him to the one crime Bush committed that he hasn't already defended and virtually ensuring no one in the future will ever investigate any of the Bush residency's shenanigans. Well, probably the last one. Maybe.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
118. I had a very similar thought.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 03:39 PM
Dec 2013

It puts Obama in a place where he's going to be damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
38. I wonder if he had already sent that out to the Guardian /NYT etc.. and they're sitting on it.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:51 PM
Dec 2013

hmm.. now would be a good time for Greenwald to disseminate that out..

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
53. The editor of The Guardian
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:11 AM
Dec 2013

said on Democracy Now! that they have Iraq/Afghanistan documents from Snowden, but they are not the (current) focus.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
78. Of course it isn't their current focus.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:02 AM
Dec 2013

Docs on Iraq/Afghanistan would make the Bush admin look bad.

Can't have that.

Greenwald himself was an admitted Bush supporter. He's also sitting on Iraq docs that will likely never see the light of day.

More proof this is political IMO.

 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
21. But But......
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:15 PM
Dec 2013

we can't talk about this here! You have to post this in the dungeon so nobody can see it or recomend it.

You obviously don't know the DU rules

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
22. I tweeted him the link to the NYPost story (which I found here on DU)
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:17 PM
Dec 2013

yesterday asking him "have you seen this?"

I guess he has now!



Cleita

(75,480 posts)
23. Michael was the first one to point to the connection in Fahrenheit 9/11. And he was boo'ed at the
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:23 PM
Dec 2013

Oscars and villified in the RWing press for it. Then there were the kissy and hand holding pics between Prince Bandar and George W. Bush. Then some time later Bush said he didn't spend much time thinking about Osama bin Laden when asked about it. There was such a Kabuki dance about this issue all through his administration. This was the reason many Americans, who were trying to figures this out, started the MIHOP(made it happen on purpose) and LIHOP(let it happen on purpose) conspiracy theories about this. Let's hope the whole truth comes out sometime before it's too late to send the whole lot of them to the International Criminal Court for war crimes.

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
59. According to one reporter Howard Dean suggested that GWB had advance knowledge of 9/11
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:28 AM
Dec 2013

Bush's response is pretty telling

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
79. When you lie that blatantly and publicly about something so important, it shakes the soul
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:03 AM
Dec 2013

xCommander AWOL Bush cannot hide the truth.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
26. KnR!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:54 PM
Dec 2013

This has been in the dungeon since 9/11 where it never belonged in the first place! I hope ALL the truths in the dungeon finally see the light of day.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
87. Were you here shortly after 9/11?
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 10:44 AM
Dec 2013

I know this stuff was posted here around that time and it was relegated to the "conspiracy dungeon". However, Graham's statements are more detailed at this point.

Blue_Adept

(6,400 posts)
112. It came up a lot back then.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:27 PM
Dec 2013

Not constantly, and not dominating thread starts, but it was definitely there. But at the time, man, there was SO much being talked about and so many ideas about what had been going on.

I still remember vividly the way threads went on 9/11 itself here. A huge flow of information, verified and not, that it was dizzying.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
31. Also interview today with Bob Graham on Huffpost on same topic.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:43 PM
Dec 2013
http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/senator-bob-graham-on-bush-saudi-911-coverup/52a88eaa78c90a42b700023e

An Op-Ed in the NY Post is raising new suspicions about Saudi Arabia's role in 9/11 and the Bush Administration's role in covering it up. We discuss the cover up with former Senator and Chairman of the Select Intelligence Committee Bob Graham.

Originally aired on December 16, 2013
Hosted by: Mike Sacks

5 minutes in on the 2001 flight

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
37. That was worth listening to, thanks. There have been other postings with Senator Graham speaking out
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:47 PM
Dec 2013

on this matter. He did speak out about this years and years ago, but frankly he's been silent until now. Maybe he was "silenced", dunno. but I'm happy to see the reports and to have him speaking up again.

Anyone care to wager a bet that we'll never see him on Charlie Rose before long?

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
32. Shut up all you nutty conspiracy wackjobs
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 08:50 PM
Dec 2013

I don't care if you're right about what really happened either. Kidding, I'm in the ranks of the doubters.

I wonder if/when we'll know about how much hanky panky went on behind the scenes and to which level it rose.

Of course we've been lied to.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
36. Tammy, please tell me it is not true that high-ranking officials of our government were party to
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:42 PM
Dec 2013

a cover-up of information about those who allegedly aided in the 9-11 terrorist attacks, for such cover-up would seem a tad more of an impeachable offense that lying about a stain on a blue dress having nothing to do with performance of official duties. But what one person know?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
45. I cant imagine that the CT posse isnt all over this thread.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:19 AM
Dec 2013

I have him on iggy so someone let me know if he posts here.

global1

(25,263 posts)
46. Let's Say That There Was Some Sort Of Cover-Up By BushCo.......
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:21 AM
Dec 2013

and that top Saudi officials did help the 911 hijackers and Bushco knew about it and aided the Saudi's in getting out of this country during the air traffic shutdown.

How do you think the Repugs in office will react to this? Will they come to the aid of Bushco or will they turn on Bushco?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
49. Sadly that's not the real concern. It's not R v D. It's 1% v 99%. None of the elite will give
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:31 AM
Dec 2013

a shit about this. If we found out incontrovertibly that Cheney and the Saudi's were behind the 9/11 attacks, the media would try to lynch Snowden.

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
69. Watch out for the RightWingers' old standby: OMG, it's gay marriage!!!!
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 03:56 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:29 AM - Edit history (1)

Gay marriage! Gay marriage!!


Illegal immigrants!!!


War on Christmas!!!!!!!

Benghazi!!

Whitewater!!

Travelgate!!




(And when they run out of gas)
Oh, heck, all politicians are corrupt anyway.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
105. I don't think it is a plausible assumption
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:36 PM
Dec 2013

to believe Bushco would cover up Saudi involvement in 911. If there was Saudi involvement in 911 there was Bushco involvement in 911. Simple as that. Two peas in one pod.

global1

(25,263 posts)
113. OK - I'll Buy That - So If That Is The Case - How Will Repugs And Repug Talking Heads.....
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:40 PM
Dec 2013

react? Will they try and deny it? Will they try and discredit it in some way? Will they be appalled by it and denounce Bushco? What would be their reaction?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
115. They always try to deny and discredit any criticism. First they attack the messenger.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:50 PM
Dec 2013

If the Bush Administration were to have their crimes exposed, the righties might rally and claim Bushco was justified and right to do as they did. Of course that claim would be absurd.

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
117. First they ignore the message. Maybe the cowering media will leave it alone.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 02:16 PM
Dec 2013

I'm not finding any reports of this resolution in the mainstream news--except the NY Post.

Premature attacks on the messenger only bring publicity to the message.

If it doesn't go away, the attacks can begin. The careers of Sen. Daschle, Sen. Dayton, Sen. Cleland, and Sen. Wellstone show what can happen.

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
52. You know, we STILL sell those motherfuckers loads of advanced weapon systems every year
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:57 AM
Dec 2013

Maybe even more than before 9/11 (and less to the Israelis?) I don't particularly like selling either of them weapons.

With friends like these....

(Shit, not two weeks ago: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/07/us-raytheon-saudi-missiles-idUSBRE9B50SF20131207)

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
67. One last observation, if I may...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 03:38 AM
Dec 2013

Bush can't remember how he found out about the first WTC attack.

He saw it on TV--



He was notified about it (0'50&quot --


Which is it? Anyone in the media ever ask him to clarify?

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
81. If a kid had robbed a liquor store and somebody got killed...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 08:38 AM
Dec 2013

...and we had the same level of evidence against him that we have had for years against the Saudis and Bush et al., the jury would have sent the kid straight to the chair.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
92. The Bush Administration
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 11:27 AM
Dec 2013

not only allowed 911 to take place, they were directly involved in planning the operation along with the Saudis. It was a false flag operation all the way.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
101. Most Americans do not care.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:08 PM
Dec 2013

It is sickeningly true.
There is so much evidence, on a plethora of traitorous activities.... on a previous post about America being a police state via the NSA, I was informed that since I could post my views, obviously I was insane.....

The most brainwashed, non-thinking people in the world are here....
I believe N. Koreans question more than our "average citizens."
At this point, IMO, "they" have won.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
107. Does this mean we can have
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:43 PM
Dec 2013

a new war?

We can now invade Saudi Arabia?

I mean, we have to, right?

Won't they greet us as liberators?

The oil will pay for the war, doncha know.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
109. What is Murdoch's angle in all this?
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:55 PM
Dec 2013

Has he seen the light?

Is it payback for Blair fooling around with his wife?

Or does he think that he can now cause more chaos by revealing the truth rather than suppressing it?

Whatever his motives, I think there should be a Truth and Reconciliation Committee that opens the books on 9/11, the torture, the wars, the spying, all of it. Get it all out in the open.


Vox Moi

(546 posts)
111. Nobody followed the money … afraid of where it would lead to?
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 01:17 PM
Dec 2013

No criminal investigation of 911.
No accounting for the money and logistical support the 911 attack required.
Heavily censored reports.
Bush and Cheney: testify together, not under oath, no recordings or notes allowed.

Nothing to see here … move along please.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
116. old news...
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 02:06 PM
Dec 2013

unless someone starts publishing names ,dates,and other details.

remember fitzgerald's investigation and judy miller/nyt?

LiberalLovinLug

(14,175 posts)
121. You are sadly correct
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 04:39 PM
Dec 2013

I am always amused, (in a black humour kind of way) at the rowdy celebrations on DU whenever a story comes out showing criminal or traitorous behaviour in some asshole right wing neo-con. Lines like "the dominoes are falling!" "I can't wait to finally see ____ go to jail!" etc..

Fact is the news media in America, in North America, have become ultra sophisticated in their propaganda mission. They have developed a Pavlovian response conditioning in the majority of their audience. If a story is given the short shift or more likely not even brought up, then it means its not that important or not true. If its repeated ad nauseam "Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi!!!" it becomes the truth.

If a tree falls in the forest and a corporate-bound news reporter sees it, it will not be heard about.

Instead they go into the forest and cut down a nice big noticeable tree, that wouldnt' have fallen on its own, with a chainsaw and then drag it out of the woods for everyone to see.

Response to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
122. Michael actually demonstrated the BFFE-Saudi-911 link
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 04:46 PM
Dec 2013

years ago in his film Fahrenheit 911.

Geez, 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia as was Osama. The other 4 were from Yemen, UAE and Egypt... not an Iraqi among them and Iraq had been under awful US led, UN sanctions since the 1st Bush war. Thus, Iraq was no possible or plausible threat. When Darth Cheney and others of that evil cabal would populate the Sunday morning shows in 2002 and 2003 justifying action against Iraq by purporting a link between the 19 and some vague meeting in Iraq or with an Iraqi, I'd scream at the TV: they learned to fly HERE in the US, so by that logic are we going to bomb ourselves.

The truth has been apparent all along despite the lying deceit of the cabal and the complicit media.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Moore all over th...