Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:50 AM Dec 2013

Forbes: Paul Ryan And The Republicans Are Lackeys To Democratic Party Big Spenders

Obviously, I don't agree with this editorial - But I do think it is a good idea to keep track of what the enemies of the human race are thinking.

Now Republicans and Democrats have come together on Capitol Hill for a new budget agreement which increases both outlays and taxes. Bipartisanship in action! That the Democratic Party wants to spend more is hardly surprising. But the GOP has demonstrated yet again that its principal role in Washington is to hold the coats of Democratic spenders when they raid the Treasury.

The legislation adopted by the House drops sequestration, which actually trimmed federal outlays, and hikes spending over the next two years by $62 billion. In return, Congress promises to lower the collective deficit over the next decade by $85 billion—while spending tens of trillions of dollars. The accord raises revenue, including a very real $12.6 billion in airline taxes. There are a few spending reductions—kind of. The bulk of them are entitlement caps a decade hence, which even Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), ranking minority member of the Senate Budget Committee, admits are of “dubious validity.”

The only surprise in the sell-out was the role of House Budget Committee Chairman and 2012 Republican Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan. Although no radical, he nevertheless had seemed committed to a more responsible budget path. Yet he traded real current spending increases for fake future spending cuts, a standard congressional tactic running back at least to the infamous Reagan tax hike of 1983.

Of course, the real issue is entitlements, but these programs don’t much interest Congress since the fiscal flood won’t fully hit until after 2023. Explained CBO: “Under current law, the aging of the population, the rising costs of health care, and the scheduled expansion in federal subsidies for health insurance will substantially boost federal spending on Social Security and the government’s major health care programs, relative to GDP, for the next 10 years and for decades thereafter.” Absent serious and meaningful reforms “debt will rise sharply relative to GDP after 2023.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougbandow/2013/12/16/paul-ryan-and-the-republicans-are-lackeys-to-democratic-party-big-spenders/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forbes: Paul Ryan And The Republicans Are Lackeys To Democratic Party Big Spenders (Original Post) Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 OP
There is a big crazy idea in some far right circles that the Republican leadership is full of RINOs. Mass Dec 2013 #1
These are the same people who think that Obama is a) a super lefist communist el_bryanto Dec 2013 #2
one kik Douglas Carpenter Dec 2013 #3
I'm shocked! Forbes published a worthless POS editorial! joeybee12 Dec 2013 #4
Paul Ryan isn't a radical?! He worships Ayn Rand and abhors equal rights. JaneyVee Dec 2013 #5

Mass

(27,315 posts)
1. There is a big crazy idea in some far right circles that the Republican leadership is full of RINOs.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:54 AM
Dec 2013

One of the interesting results is that these guys are all primaried (and some have several primary opponents): Boehner, Cantor, McConnell, Alexander, ...

Actually, it is very funny to go on these sites and see these guys called Democratic lite. Who would have believed that.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. These are the same people who think that Obama is a) a super lefist communist
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 09:56 AM
Dec 2013

and b) unwilling to compromise. Where you stand on the political spectrum controls how you see things a great deal.

Bryant

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
4. I'm shocked! Forbes published a worthless POS editorial!
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:28 PM
Dec 2013

How did this ever happen? It's never happened before, has it????

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
5. Paul Ryan isn't a radical?! He worships Ayn Rand and abhors equal rights.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 07:32 PM
Dec 2013

Fuck that. He's a radical extremist. No more painting these fuckers as centrists.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Forbes: Paul Ryan And The...