Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:32 PM Mar 2012

Library demands fire victim pay for destroyed books

SHAWNEE, KS (KCTV) - A devastated Jasmine Heinson watched her home go up in flames.

She was overjoyed and broke down in tears last month when firefighters searching through the rubble of the Fox Run Apartments discovered precious memories and photographs of her mother. This included her mother's wedding ring.

As she works to rebuild her life, she has discovered that many businesses are benevolent. Both Time Warner Cable and AT&T are letting her out of her contracts early and not charging her for equipment lost in the blaze.

Then she encountered the Johnson County Library System. The library wants the University of Missouri at Kansas City student to repay the costs of books destroyed in the blaze.

more . . . http://www.kctv5.com/story/17142379/library-demands-fire-victim-pay-for-destroyed-books

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
2. I do not see an issue with this....
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 12:14 AM
Mar 2012

Her insurance will cover the books. If she had rented a tool from home depot they deserve to be paid also.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
8. Not the same thing at all. We're not discussing HER losses.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:19 AM
Mar 2012

But the loss of property in her possession owned by others.
Also in terms of houses on fire, a book equals bugger all. A phone handset is 0.01% of value lost. A set top box? 0.05% perhaps. A leased solar array (a VALID comparison) might be 1 or 2 percent of the total 100 times as much. It would also include mandatory insurance against certain types of loss, because expecting the leassee to cough up $5000 - $10,000 on the spot is as futile as pissing up a rope.

AT&T and Time Warner get it. The dollar value of goodwill is worth a couple of bucks.

FFS a library should want to bend over backwards to not alienate "customers". They're few and far enough between as it is these days and rapidly getting fewer.


 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
7. No. She just wouldn't get her deposit back and they'd replace...
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 02:10 AM
Mar 2012

...it through their own insurance, because they'd lose more chasing her and her stonewalling insurer.

Once upon a time libraries would have had the decency to wait for her insurance to come through, not go her when she likely has no money for getting.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
10. I have no problem with them requiring payment for the books.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:30 AM
Mar 2012

I have no problem with them requiring payment for the books. They were in her possession and were her responsibility. I do, however, think the library should be patient and wait for her insurance to settle the claim.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
12. Are you serious? You think maybe the deductable might be more than $100? This is where....
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 05:34 PM
Mar 2012

liberals start sounding silly.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
13. What do you suppose AT&T's deductible is? They forgave her bill.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 07:24 PM
Mar 2012

A local radio station was all over this story today and flooded the library with emails and phone calls protesting this decision. Very stupid on the library's part. It's called compassion. I pay taxes to this library system and I want to see them behave in a compassionate manner.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
15. Jesus, I get tired of this stuff........
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 07:30 PM
Mar 2012

I pay taxes also and think the LIBRARY did not start the fire! Of course you can always find people who will be mad at the library for doing nothing wrong except wanting their property back or paid for.

I am sure the library could use the funds also.

I am calling the library now to provide my support.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
17. I pay taxes too and I would not begrudge the cost of replacing the books due to a calamity.
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 07:45 AM
Mar 2012

Evidently you think the library is more important than a person.
If you had ever suffered a disaster like this, it might change your way of thinking.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Library demands fire vict...