General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooting the Pension Funds: All across America, Wall St. is grabbing money meant for public workers
From September of this year, but I thought it particularly apropos since the new "budget deal" is looming and includes MORE public worker and military pension cuts..... . .
The state's workers, in other words, were being forced to subsidize their own political disenfranchisement, coughing up at least $200 million to members of a group that had supported anti-labor laws. Later, when Edward Siedle, a former SEC lawyer, asked Raimondo in a column for Forbes.com how much the state was paying in fees to these hedge funds, she first claimed she didn't know. Raimondo later told the Providence Journal she was contractually obliged to defer to hedge funds on the release of "proprietary" information, which immediately prompted a letter in protest from a series of freaked-out interest groups. Under pressure, the state later released some fee information, but the information was originally kept hidden, even from the workers themselves. "When I asked, I was basically hammered," says Marcia Reback, a former sixth-grade schoolteacher and retired Providence Teachers Union president who serves as the lone union rep on Rhode Island's nine-member State Investment Commission. "I couldn't get any information about the actual costs."
This is the third act in an improbable triple-fucking of ordinary people that Wall Street is seeking to pull off as a shocker epilogue to the crisis era. Five years ago this fall, an epidemic of fraud and thievery in the financial-services industry triggered the collapse of our economy. The resultant loss of tax revenue plunged states everywhere into spiraling fiscal crises, and local governments suffered huge losses in their retirement portfolios remember, these public pension funds were some of the most frequently targeted suckers upon whom Wall Street dumped its fraud-riddled mortgage-backed securities in the pre-crash years.
Today, the same Wall Street crowd that caused the crash is not merely rolling in money again but aggressively counterattacking on the public-relations front. The battle increasingly centers around public funds like state and municipal pensions. This war isn't just about money. Crucially, in ways invisible to most Americans, it's also about blame. In state after state, politicians are following the Rhode Island playbook, using scare tactics and lavishly funded PR campaigns to cast teachers, firefighters and cops not bankers as the budget-devouring boogeymen responsible for the mounting fiscal problems of America's states and cities.
Secrets and Lies of the Bailout
Not only did these middle-class workers already lose huge chunks of retirement money to huckster financiers in the crash, and not only are they now being asked to take the long-term hit for those years of greed and speculative excess, but in many cases they're also being forced to sit by and watch helplessly as Gordon Gekko wanna-be's like Loeb or scorched-earth takeover artists like Bain Capital are put in charge of their retirement savings.
THE REST of this hideous tale of the economic RAPE of the middle class:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/looting-the-pension-funds-20130926
Skittles
(153,193 posts)they are not, and they WILL be coming after yours
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)El_Johns
(1,805 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Aided and abetted by representatives of the 1%.
Response to Triana (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)You seem to have a "thing"
Response to Agschmid (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'll "come out" ain't like I haven't done it before.
senseandsensibility
(17,138 posts)Please.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,021 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Or at least is get a few hundred ripped from the hands of Jamie Dimon.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)and run it as a non-profit in a planned economy. The admin costs will be MUCH lower than the profit margin.
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)The topic is too serious for such shock jock reporting. He'd get a wider audience by just telling the story and backing up his many assertions with backing examples. You can't present this to someone you want to persuade.
senseandsensibility
(17,138 posts)you've convinced me. If you say it doesn't meet your sophisticated standards it's obviously not to be trusted.
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)I'm asking for readable. He describes someone as "a dickishly ubiquitous young right-wing kingmaker with clear designs on becoming the next generation's Koch brothers.."
A little too much Matt Taibbi for me to get through to the facts. Like an over-salted steak. Hell, I'd eat a goddamned pizza puff first!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)Like an amoeba with a brain.
SharonAnn
(13,778 posts)Stating that Goldman Sachs is "a giant vampire squid wrapped about the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood-funnel into anything that looks like money".
One of the best descriptions of the predatory Wall Street firm(s) that I've ever seen.
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)But I think that, unless you are already of the opinion that these people suck, you'll have hard time getting through all five pages of the article. One of the people he quotes drops an f-bomb, but its power is diluted, in my opinion.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)n/t
yodermon
(6,143 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)But I would never ask you to skim through 5 pages of jiz.
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)Taibbi is the irreverent journalistic son of HST.
My advice... learn to get past the "sophomoric" language, and concentrate on the topic.
I believe he uses lots of examples in his stories, myself.
I don't necessarily always agree with Matt, but I sure as hell read his stuff.
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)I'm not criticizing his journalism. The presentation is distracting. I don't mind irreverence, but I need to be set up with a little context first. I don't necessarily want to jump into Mike Hammer's mind if I'm asked to judge the evidence.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)Five years later, Buffett's zero-effort, pin-the-tail-on-the-stock-market portfolio is up 8.69 percent total. Protégé's numbers are comical in comparison; all those superminds came up with a 0.13 percent increase over five long years, meaning Buffett is beating the hedgies by nearly nine points without lifting a finger.
Union leaders all over the country have started to figure out the perils of hiring a bunch of overpriced Wall Street wizards to manage the public's money. Among other things, investing with hedge funds is infinitely more expensive than investing with simple index funds. On Wall Street and in the investment world, the management price is measured in something called basis points, a basis point equaling one hundredth of one percent. So a state like Rhode Island, which is paying a two percent fee to hedge funds, is said to be paying an upfront fee of 200 basis points.
How much does it cost to invest public money in a simple index fund? "We've paid as little as .875 of a basis point," says William Atwood, executive director of the Illinois State Board of Investment. "At most, five basis points."
So at the low end, Atwood is paying 200 times less than the standard two percent hedge-fund fee.
Looks pretty easy to understand to me. 200 times more. What's so hard?
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)I'll give it another shot after the wife and kids are asleep.
msongs
(67,443 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)although this current pillage has been going on for over thirty years.
Maybe someone should do something about that.
& R
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)It's The System Stupid. To paraphrase a Bill Clinton campaign phrase.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)They are absolutely CLUELESS about what they are facing.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)The ones complaining that Bev Perdue was a crook. Well, the R's and McCrory are bigger crooks than she could have ever dreamed of being. My attitude is one of I told you so.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)This cycle has been repeated through history, rich people trying to make off with everything if they can.
Love Taibbi, I see him kind of like this generation's Hunter Thompson.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)will do absolutely nothing to defend themselves or do anything, even vote, to stop it.
Most are clueless but those that are in the know will do nothing while complaining to anyone who will listen.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)http://www.cnbc.com/id/100694955
Obama Appoints Bain Capital Consultant Jeff Ziets to Top Post
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662209
Obama selects former Monsanto lobbyist to be his TPP chief agriculture negotiator
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662210
The Totally Unfair And Bitterly Uneven 'Recovery,' In 12 Charts HuffPo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662029
Larry Summers Gets 'Full-Throated Defense' From Obama In Capitol Hill Meeting
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014553343#post1
Wall Street will get away with massive wave of criminality of 2008 - Statute of Limitations
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022516719
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...I've said it twice.
- You can't fix rotten. If we don't stop them, they'll stop us.
K&R
lutefisk
(3,974 posts)...I'll just say that it kills the economy and devastates families. It's simply another part of the private/corporate grab for public money- the easiest and most profitable form of theft of the 21st Century. Here in Wisconsin, we're getting our pension fund (fully funded and the strongest in the country) looted very soon. It's just criminal.
nikto
(3,284 posts)Produce America's first suicide-bombers, and perhaps
a whole new group of potential assassins.
It would be an awful consequence, resulting from, and in reaction to, terrible injustice.
Taking pensions away from people who have worked their entire lives
and have little or nothing else, could produce a group of older, but hardened,
militants who feel they have nothing to lose and are not afraid to die.
Maybe it won't develop, and folks will continue to take this garbage lying down.
We'll see...
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)enable the thieves. There's a way to fight this and suicide bombers and individual acts of terrorism are NOT the way. All that does is replace one actor with another. To fight this shit you've got to take down the entire edifice of capitalism. To paraphrase a famous campaign slogan, It's The System Stupid. ITSS.
nikto
(3,284 posts)If they take away PART of the pensions of a bunch of people, that will make them fighting mad,
and probably energize them to political activism.
If they should take away/eliminate ENTIRE pensions, literally throwing people in the streets, all bets are off.
Hopefully, it wouldn't get that extreme.
It depends on the amount of restraint, and pity, bankers and investors have.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)or investors.
It's called a strike. Of indefinite duration and general. Shut it all down and the workers then take political power through worker, soldier, and neighborhood councils.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)All Iceland.
Just picture Bjork with a sledge-hammer and crowbar.
onethatcares
(16,185 posts)who won "dancing with stars" this past week?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)So many people all across the political landscape (ie, us folks, too!) hear about pension "reform" measures being taken at the state and local levels, watch promised pension money magically disappear and just buy into the bullshit claims of the 1% and their operatives.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)And plez spare me the, "she's better than Palin" argument.
If we want this behavior to stop we must elect progressives. The Lieberman Wing of the Democratic Party is willing to let us sink into serfdom.
Rex
(65,616 posts)They lose someone else's 401k and go out for a steak dinner. We lose our house, stop eating and start looking for shelter. They have their dinner paid for by lobbying firms. Everything is free for them as long as they play the game. We have to buy something off the dollar menu at McDonald's, start counting all our loose change and looking for a hotel to stay in. For now.
We play the game too, but we're always meant to fail so that another anonymous number can take up our role as corporate slave -always seems to happen when we start to make too much money for our 'position'. Doesn't seem to be a problem for the CEO/VP/Pres/XO types. Their positions are so much more important than ours, they are few in number and treated like gods. We are just serfs in their grind.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)The 401-ks got looted..
housing equity got looted..
they crashed the stock market (many times)
They cannot seem to get enough support to grab the social security money (yet)
The banksters/wallstreet gamblers HAVE to go "where the money is"
For now at least, that means pensions that remain in place for the few lucky ones who managed to hang onto them in the post-reagan era.
They got greedy & overplayed their hand with the 401-ks. All that luscious loot rolling in for a few decades gave them ample play-money to gamble with, but sooner or later the Boomers would want to cash in their chips and might actually WANT "their money".''Many (like myself) have known this would happen.. for years, and were always told to calm, down..."did we know how HUGE the "market " was..and that the sheer size of it would weather the storm of retirees wanting their money"..
What many who called us nervous-Nellies did not factor into the mix, was greed..and hubris..and a lack of shame.
Shameless money-grubbers will take Granny's last dime if they get a chance..
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)refuse to remember the last time around.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Some are from the right and some are from the left, some have no bent, do it this for self-interest, including both sides. These are the ones who are devouring the government by privatization. They show up at every public meeting of every single thing to determine all policy decisions as part of their insistence on getting paid by offering their private brand.
They dress up their endeavours with a mission statement with no discipline, accountability or transparency, as they are now 'private.' But taking money from those in the same field with every fault highlighted in paid presentations by media, to further make them look bad, and call for their being laid off.
Real public workers are not allowed to lobby openly as private sector groups do, it's seen as a conflict of interest for them to even negotiate the terms of their employment and the clients they care for. Many of these people who stay in these fields have a real heart for the people in their care.
They do not make a lot of money, are scrambling to get by, many have to work two or three jobs to make ends meet and have a family, and for those in cities, they cannot afford to buy homes there, but must rent to be close to work. Conditions not unknown to those in the private sector, yet they are no allowed to hold their heads up high as those others in 'more honest work' get to do.
Fascism and Big Brotherism is not from the top down, it is from the bottom up. A people have to be conditioned to see nepotism as a their only way to get ahead, and thus suppport it. Almost everyone disqualified from the steady income of city, county, state or federal work, cried they were discriminated against by hiring quotas, and felt resentment. They didn't get that job security with pension and benefits secured by unions there, and have gone along and passed by word of mouth all memes of the overpaid, stupid, unjust public worker. So they vote to defund them and not pay any taxes.
It's been in television programs, on radio, and in the bars and public meeting places. What they fail to grasp is that the jobs for the most part public workers do are not easy and don't pay as well as the private sector did and the conditions can be very harsh indeed, but they only look at the ones they see as lazy and overpaid. It is part of the rebellion against authority just for the sake of it, that we all have ingrained in us as a way of fighting for ourselves.
I've never been a public worker but have great respect for most of them. Others, I have actively sought to separate their ideas of their career being the primary goal instead of the mission to serve that the taxpayers pay for. There are public workers that are very troubling in the way they use their authority.
But not the majority, especially those in the social safety net jobs without holidays, shifts that defy good health at times, and lack of time with their family. Combine with knowing they are hated, that they are not allowed to advocate for better conditions without being seen as greedy, and subject to the petty whims of legislators who want them all fired and let their charges end up in jail, prison or under a bridge, and it's a truly demoralizing job.
The push for stealing pensions for jobs that didn't pay that well to begin with, became in real life terms, professions that are part of one's life, not just a paycheck did not simply come from decades of disrespect for the New Deal and government doing anything. It's part of the disdain for workers.
We're not even taught about how the government works in the real world, just fairy tales. Because we've been taught it's all dirty and wrong. I've lived in the corporate world, and those who think government is dirty, ought to see the blatant way that they make decisions and how they regard their work force, even unionized ones. They look people in the face and destroy their lives and then celebrate the big victory.
To do government work takes at first a certain positive or even naive outlook to doing good, to want to help others. Business is not about that, doing bad to others is good for the bottom line. And they want the whole world to think that way.
My solution to the pension mess is to elect those who do believe there is something worth doing for people they do not know but with a good heart to others in general. People are not getting involved and they are letting corporatists take over.
JMHO, clumsily cudgeled into a post on my way out the door.
snot
(10,538 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)but the first part is on the money, as it were.
Over here in NJ, Christie Whitman, the first Christie, issued bonds against the pension funds. The second Christie, the current Republican huckster, ain't about to pay for her bonds. He's figuring on getting into the WH before the whole thing collapses.
I hope Taibbi does a thorough analysis of NJ's state of affairs if Christie winds up being the 2016 nominee for Prez on the Republican side.