Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo Will That Be the Wild or Patented Salmon?
from Civil Eats:
So Will That Be the Wild or Patented Salmon?
March 12th, 2012
By Peter Hanlon
It looks like 2012 will be the year of two salmons: one a genetically altered Frankenfish currently under review by the Food and Drug Administration, and the other an inhabitant of one of the worlds last great wild salmon runs, which is unfortunately situated atop a whole lot of copper and gold deposits.
Our first salmon represents a giant step into the unknown of genetically engineered organisms. AquaBounty, a company originally incorporated to produce antifreeze, is trying to get FDA approval of its very own patented salmon species called AquAdvantage. If approved, the purportedly sterile, all-female salmon would be the first-ever market-approved, genetically engineered protein to reach our dinner plates. But in the absurd world of engineered food, the FDA is not reviewing AquAdvantage salmon as fish, rather its being studied as a new animal drug. A new animal drugsorry, fishthat wouldnt require labeling on grocery shelves or menus.
Three consumer groupsFood and Water Watch, Consumers Union and the Center for Food Safetyrecently submitted a petition calling on the FDA to reclassify the genetically altered fish so that it undergoes a more rigorous review process. Even the current Congress has taken note, with at least 30 House members and 14 senators having written the Obama administration expressing serious concerns about the FDAs review of AquAdvantage salmon, in some cases calling for the outright prohibition of its approval for human consumption.
In a hearing last December, Four Fish author Paul Greenberg told a Senate subcommittee that This fish is not worth the risk. We would be better pursuing a course of truly sustainable aquaculture and better management and use of our wild fisheries. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://civileats.com/2012/03/12/so-will-that-be-the-wild-or-patented-salmon/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 829 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So Will That Be the Wild or Patented Salmon? (Original Post)
marmar
Mar 2012
OP
Auggie
(31,174 posts)1. Soylent Pink
flvegan
(64,409 posts)2. We could, and I'm just saying...
not suggesting, just saying...maybe we could just stop eating them altogether. Just a thought.