Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert Parry: Honoring Mandela, Not Reagan
from Consortium News:
Honoring Mandela, Not Reagan
December 6, 2013
Exclusive: The U.S. governments relationship with Nelson Mandela was often strained, from the CIAs hand in his imprisonment to Ronald Reagans veto of a sanctions bill aimed at getting him freed, lost history that must now be reconciled, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
As Americans honor the memory of Nelson Mandela, they must grapple with the inconvenient truth that one of their most honored recent presidents, Ronald Reagan, fiercely opposed punishing white-ruled South Africa for keeping Mandela locked up and for continuing the racist apartheid system that he challenged.
Rhetorically, Reagan did object to apartheid and did call for Mandelas release, but Reagan viewed the struggle for racial justice in South Africa through a Cold War lens, leading him to veto a 1986 bill imposing economic sanctions on the Pretoria regime aimed at forcing Mandelas freedom and compelling the dismantling of apartheid.
In explaining his veto on July 22, 1986, Reagan reserved his harshest criticism for the Soviet-armed guerrillas of the African National Congress, a movement that Mandela led. Reagan accused the ANC of having embarked on new acts of terrorism within South Africa. He also claimed that the Soviet Union would be the main beneficiary of a revolutionary overthrow of the Pretoria regime.
Beyond opposing sanctions that might destabilize the white-supremacist regime, Reagan argued that the key to the future lies with the South African government. He called for not a Western withdrawal but deeper involvement by the Western business community as agents of change and progress and growth. .......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2013/12/06/honoring-mandela-not-reagan/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 635 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Parry: Honoring Mandela, Not Reagan (Original Post)
marmar
Dec 2013
OP
indepat
(20,899 posts)1. One wonders just how much of post-WWII nefarious activities/intrigue must the CIA's fingerprints be
all over?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)2. Just bet on all of them
and you won't be often wrong.
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)3. "one of their most honored recent presidents" Ronal Reagan?
I gagged on that one.