General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOkay. I am seriously creeped out now!
@Google_Photos:
It used to be common in areas to take photos 'Post Death' The girl standing in this photo is dead.
I know people would take pictures of the dead, but I never heard of or saw this.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)people most often died at home and way more often with a shorter life span.
But I don't think I've seen a pix of any standing up while dead.
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)I have sat up by the casket of a relative who was brought home before the funeral. That was a custom.
I also find cemeteries fascinating.* My Mama would bring us along to spruce up the area. We would wander around and check out the tombstones. There were a few that dated from the 1880's. Many had small pictures of the deceased embedded in them.
We learned a lot about our relatives who who were buried there.
*I do not find them fascinating at night.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)It was a big cemetery in Philadelphia. We averaged about 15-20 funerals a week.
I probably attended more than 1000 funerals (set them up, stand off to the side, break it all down after).
And I probably set up around 1000 tombstones too.
One fascinating element was the variation between ethnic and religious groups. Each group had its own set of customs.
And I have lots of great stories from back then, including night time stories.
JHB
(37,161 posts)Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)Someone was in a deep grave and her brother asked if he was dead.
Wednesday said, "Does it matter?"
FSogol
(45,488 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)It was a fascinating practice.
nevergiveup
(4,762 posts)because of her hands.......other than that I would not have had a clue and yes, I find it a touch creepy.
treestar
(82,383 posts)They would superimpose the head on a standing body. Photography was fare more expensive and that was their last chance, I suppose. Also portrait painting would have been expensive. So it was their only way of saving a memento of the person's face. Weird how, for that time, it was a big advance in technology, with poorer people than could have portraits painted have a way of preserving an image of a loved one.
Fla Dem
(23,691 posts)Amazing work to get the face and especially the eyes not to have that "death mask" look.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)The dead girl's hands must have been purplish from all the blood pooling down there.
Fla Dem
(23,691 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,378 posts)where it took time to get the photographer there, and no amount of retouching could restore a lifelike appearance.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)looked like he was standing. My grandma had a picture of him. It wasn't that long ago either, during the 1960's.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Some of it was made from the hair of the deceased.
http://www.historicnewengland.org/collections-archives-exhibitions/online-exhibitions/JewelryHistory/themes/Mourning.htm
GreenPartyVoter
(72,378 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)However, I'm guessing in an era where photos were rare, relatives might want something to remember what their loved one looked like when they died -especially children who change so fast that they probably have no recent photos. So I can understand WHY but it's still so weird. She doesn't look dead which makes it creepier.
malaise
(269,054 posts)but now the morticians have the dead on motor bikes or standing in their homes.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)but i dont judge it
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)It does comfort people.
I am just saying that this particular move gives me the willies. I am sure some of my beliefs would give others agita.
malaise
(269,054 posts)TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...at first, but really not much stranger than a corpse laying in a casket. I think they did a good job. Personally, I prefer cremation; but if you're going to paint up a corpse and put it on display, this idea seems as good as any.
TYY
malaise
(269,054 posts)I'll be cremated as well.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)as a part of some research I was doing at the time. I found it fascinating. Death masks are also fascinating to me and that practice has been about throughout history. There is something almost mystical about gazing a the face of someone from so long ago whose words or deeds still resonate today.
TBF
(32,067 posts)but I can understand how in the old days there weren't as many chances for photography during the short life spans. And of course prohibitively expensive for most.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)I kid, I kid.
Agreed, it's creepy. But people weren't so insulated from nature and natural events back then. She does look amazing. Wonder how they got her to "look at the camera." Glass eyes?
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Sometimes, they even drew them on the photograph, itself.
People took these portraits because the photography was very expensive and often the only remembrance they could have of their loved one had to be taken either right before they died or after they died.