Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 08:21 PM Dec 2013

Walmart is selling ripped-off prints of Banksy’s ‘Destroy Capitalism’


The irony! There’s just so much of it! On so many levels!


I suggest we all take a moment and think about the person who would purchase such a thing from Walmart, other than perhaps Sybil. What they do with their day? What led them to make the choice to shop at Walmart, the very symbol of capitalism gone wrong, and also to buy this particular Banksy print? We may never know.

Because Banksy doesn’t copyright his work, the company is basically free to use it without permission.

In addition to this, some of the prints labeled as Banksy prints on the site are actually the work of other artists. Graffiti artist Eddie Colla’s print, with the very ironic words “If you want to achieve greatness stop asking for permission,” is on the site and labeled as a Banksy piece, as is Thierry Guetta’s 2008 “Life is Beautiful” piece. Colla intends to pursue legal action.


http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/210622/walmart-is-selling-prints-of-banksys-destroy-capitalism/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walmart is selling ripped-off prints of Banksy’s ‘Destroy Capitalism’ (Original Post) n2doc Dec 2013 OP
if it is freely useable then it can hardly be "ripped-off" nt msongs Dec 2013 #1
Not legally, but I imagine the case may be made for ethically. LanternWaste Dec 2013 #4
This is like when a picture shows its subject in a mirror who is looking in a mirror who is looking KittyWampus Dec 2013 #2
Under US law, the copyright is automatic when the work is lightcameron Dec 2013 #3
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
4. Not legally, but I imagine the case may be made for ethically.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 08:35 PM
Dec 2013

Not legally, but I imagine the case may be made for its usage ethically.. if one looks at the contemporary definitions.

2. exploitation, especially of those who cannot prevent or counter it.
3. a copy or imitation.




But none of that is really the actual point being made, is it...?

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
2. This is like when a picture shows its subject in a mirror who is looking in a mirror who is looking
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 08:31 PM
Dec 2013

in a mirror who is looking in a mirror.

lightcameron

(224 posts)
3. Under US law, the copyright is automatic when the work is
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 08:33 PM
Dec 2013

in a "fixed medium." Registering a copyright isn't necessary; it just gives your claim a little more weight in a legal action and allows you to seek higher damages.

The problem with this guy is that much of the work is done illegally (i.e. on someone else's private property) so any copyright claim is out the window in those cases. That's what makes this one so dicey.

But to your point, I love the message in this piece. I remember people buying anti-capitalism shirts at Lollapalooza one year. Great irony, probably lost on the customers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Walmart is selling ripped...