Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DU: porn vs TPP (Original Post) WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 OP
Best part is that in the porn threads, no ones mind is changed and the legal situation cant change stevenleser Dec 2013 #1
Porngeon! Smut Hut! Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #6
LOL, that wasn't exactly what I meant... stevenleser Dec 2013 #13
Lets do a poll. BootinUp Dec 2013 #2
I think people will need to Google TPP before they vote... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #4
What is TTP? (I kid, I kid) nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #7
I did a google for DU Porn dot com, and it took me to JC Penny's Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #65
because anyone with an internet connection can easily find out what porn is Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #3
Not so... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #8
DU google 8040 postings re TPP westerebus Dec 2013 #22
westerebus getting off to porn WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #28
Well that's weird. westerebus Dec 2013 #70
I'm not talking about "what the TPP is", I'm talking about what the actual agreement SAYS. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #42
full transparency/prevent it from being fast tracked...agreed WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #44
pretty sure tpp stands for some sexual act. loli phabay Dec 2013 #11
*** Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #43
lol, submission is the best option. loli phabay Dec 2013 #46
holy shit I just made a B&BH reference below without seeing this arely staircase Dec 2013 #47
i know who they are, but never seen it before. loli phabay Dec 2013 #50
Have Clinton or Obama weighed in on the DU Porn Wars? arely staircase Dec 2013 #5
Hey, Bill doesn't STAND for it! jazzimov Dec 2013 #41
I know its hard (beavis and butthead snicker here) arely staircase Dec 2013 #44
I thought he was standing for it RainDog Dec 2013 #49
isn't Linda Tripp really John Goodman? mdbl Dec 2013 #66
more like John Mitchell RainDog Dec 2013 #72
the John Goodman/Linda Tripp SNL skits were some of their best ever nt arely staircase Dec 2013 #81
WHOOoooosh RainDog Dec 2013 #86
Yep libodem Dec 2013 #80
what's a little wiretapping between friends, right? RainDog Dec 2013 #87
I agree the libodem Dec 2013 #88
No, Joshie wrote RainDog Dec 2013 #89
Exactly libodem Dec 2013 #90
Popular discussion topics at discussion sites tend to be those that reflect disagreement/controversy lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #9
correct arely staircase Dec 2013 #48
We are cumming together against it davidpdx Dec 2013 #59
yeah I really didn't mean it that way arely staircase Dec 2013 #60
It's easy to have an opinion on Porn el_bryanto Dec 2013 #10
porn is the new pornography of DU WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #12
Wow. Gotta K&R this. nt riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #14
We know how to prioritize LittleBlue Dec 2013 #15
I've already come down against the TPP RainDog Dec 2013 #16
But did you come up for porn? Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2013 #69
lol. Some might perceive my position that way... n/t RainDog Dec 2013 #71
Let me guess: all MALES on this thread (so far)? CTyankee Dec 2013 #17
Your point being ? nt el_bryanto Dec 2013 #19
what do you think? I'm listening... CTyankee Dec 2013 #20
It could mean any number of things - so want to make sure I know what you mean el_bryanto Dec 2013 #23
I wonder, which is why I ask. CTyankee Dec 2013 #24
Probably would have been the same - but what would be the significance el_bryanto Dec 2013 #25
My point indeed... CTyankee Dec 2013 #27
I see what you are saying. Males like myself are insensitive to the vast cruelties of TPP el_bryanto Dec 2013 #30
Goodness! Don't put too fine a point on this, Bryant! Really! CTyankee Dec 2013 #32
wrong. I count three females I know of before you posted RainDog Dec 2013 #38
Oh, uhmmm, ehhh, well... ThoughtCriminal Dec 2013 #58
Who started all those porn threads? pintobean Dec 2013 #64
I suspect this is, in part, because there are many conflicting opinions on porn arcane1 Dec 2013 #18
That seems to be the default reply, but it's also accompanied by a forfeit WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #33
Perhaps the TPP is less controversial MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #21
To be fair... FreeJoe Dec 2013 #26
I agree with you...things somehow work out differently...I myself was drawing that CTyankee Dec 2013 #29
To be fair to whom? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #34
October 2 2013 economy group westerebus Dec 2013 #76
Porn Posts have always been popular here on DU. We have many libertarians KoKo Dec 2013 #37
who are libertarians here who vote Democratic? RainDog Dec 2013 #40
I'd rather hear about the issues that matter to most Americans: CorrectOfCenter Dec 2013 #31
You would think stopping the biggest corporate coup since Citizens United would be one too. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #35
It would be interesting to see how many views the threads had also. Revanchist Dec 2013 #36
+1. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #55
try posting about education. No one seems to care about education either. liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #39
I know. n/t KoKo Dec 2013 #51
I think people care about a lot of posts/issues even when they don't comment RainDog Dec 2013 #54
I tried talking about the benefits of recycling urine. Kaleva Dec 2013 #75
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #52
snicker, you used exposure in a porn thread. loli phabay Dec 2013 #53
Some people want to tell others what they can and cannot view on the internet. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #56
Links to TPP threads (that have died a quick death) WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #57
... RainDog Dec 2013 #67
Porn is Kung- Fu theatre, TPP is depraved . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2013 #61
Oh gawd KICK and REC!!!! +1,000,000,000 upi402 Dec 2013 #62
I never reply to porn threads... alittlelark Dec 2013 #63
On a typical day, I converse much more about work than politics LanternWaste Dec 2013 #68
How many different people have posted in the porn threads? Kaleva Dec 2013 #73
DU has a new porn group? Omaha Steve Dec 2013 #74
not yet RainDog Dec 2013 #77
oh yes, the evil Obama and Clinton are clouding our minds with porn threads. dionysus Dec 2013 #78
The OP WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #79
As George Carlin once said arely staircase Dec 2013 #82
Practically everyone on DU agrees about the TPP being a bad thing. Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2013 #83
Trash ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #84
It's much harder for people to get intellectually worked-up over TPP/TPIP... Chan790 Dec 2013 #85
Not really... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #92
Well, yes. Chan790 Dec 2013 #93
We do know this much about what's in TPP... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #95
I think a lot of people see it like NAFTA RainDog Dec 2013 #97
DUfail PowerToThePeople Dec 2013 #91
Porn attracts attention. In_The_Wind Dec 2013 #94
Good one . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2013 #96
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
1. Best part is that in the porn threads, no ones mind is changed and the legal situation cant change
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:49 PM
Dec 2013

It is a totally wasted exercise that pits two groups against each other that will not ever change their minds.

It really ought to have its own dungeon.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
3. because anyone with an internet connection can easily find out what porn is
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

the actual text of the TPP, not so much.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
8. Not so...
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:57 PM
Dec 2013

Just not on DU's radar.

Bernie Sanders, Thom Hartman, Ed Schultz talk about it every day.

Each thread has a link to an article.

The greatest concern now is that Obama is hoping to fast track it. The Obamacare fiasco is providing him a nice smoke screen.

westerebus

(2,976 posts)
70. Well that's weird.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:27 PM
Dec 2013

I've posted about the TPP in the economy group and occasionally in GD over the last four years. I've been a critic of it from the get go. On the other hand...

westerebus gets off on porn...fixed it for you...it's not just for breakfast any more..

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
42. I'm not talking about "what the TPP is", I'm talking about what the actual agreement SAYS.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:03 PM
Dec 2013

Which is, AFAIUI, still hush-hush secret... which makes it hard to discount things that are said about it, hyperbolic or no.

I think the first thing that process needs is full transparency, I don't think anyone could argue with that.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
47. holy shit I just made a B&BH reference below without seeing this
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:08 PM
Dec 2013

I think you are right about our demographics.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
5. Have Clinton or Obama weighed in on the DU Porn Wars?
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

And by Clinton I mean Hillary. Pretty sure I know where Bill stands.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
44. I know its hard (beavis and butthead snicker here)
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:06 PM
Dec 2013

not to launch into a million I Love the 90s BC dick jokes at this point. But I will refrain.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
49. I thought he was standing for it
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:10 PM
Dec 2013

Didn't the Divine Ms. L state she was buying knee pads before she took that job? Why yes, she did.

I still think that whole thing was a set up by the ratphuckers - it's just too convenient that Lucianne Goldberg, who was a freaking mole on McGovern's campaign bus, and Linda Tripp were besties with Monica.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
87. what's a little wiretapping between friends, right?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:05 PM
Dec 2013

Lucianne Goldberg, in a 1997 interview published in the New York Times, claimed that she had advised Tripp to record her conversations with Lewinsky in order to obtain factual proof for a book deal.

Oh, and Goldberg's son is a nasty piece of work, too, with his lies trying to conflate liberalism with fascism.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
88. I agree the
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:33 PM
Dec 2013

Son is a pseudo-intellectual impostor. Seems like his book had a term like 'Islamofascism', in the title?

Who makes that shit up?

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
89. No, Joshie wrote
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:38 PM
Dec 2013

Liberal Fascism - and used all the right wing tps about Hitler and socialism - the same stuff you hear among tea baggers now. And then, of course, Coulter, who was a "pixie" - a lawyer who worked with Clinton haters in Ark. to just throw stuff at him, constantly - tried to rehabilitate McCarthy because, according to conservatives, he was right.

I read Joe Conason's book, The Hunting of the President, about the whole mess. Everyone involved in the 70 million dollars of tax payer money wasted investigating a blow job was rewarded handsomely for their participation.

We see them now doing the same things to Obama - just in a different key.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
9. Popular discussion topics at discussion sites tend to be those that reflect disagreement/controversy
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:57 PM
Dec 2013

TPP isn't very controversial here; we all hate it and we could rail against it, but there are precious few elected officials (democrat or otherwise) who deserve praise.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
60. yeah I really didn't mean it that way
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:40 PM
Dec 2013

consciously anyway. But I confess I realized it afterward and didn't change it.

We have to stop.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
10. It's easy to have an opinion on Porn
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:58 PM
Dec 2013

It's harder to have an opinion on TPP

Also - I think that there's less to say about TPP - I am pretty close to a free market advocate, but even I can see that TPP is pretty awful. It's hard to have much of a discussion when everybody agrees that it's awfful.

Bryant

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
16. I've already come down against the TPP
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:05 PM
Dec 2013

and against the total lack of transparency regarding the contents of the same.

This is just an example of the bread and circuses of empire... people can fight all day about porn, but the real, substantive issues that actually improve the lives of Americans are outside of their ability to influence, for the most part.

...as we also saw in regard to the banker bailout/homeowner bankruptcy moment.

After a while, people get cynical about politics when they're only supposed to show up to vote, then their views on issues are ignored because a very few actually influence policy on trade issues, environmental issues, tax issues, etc. etc. etc.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
23. It could mean any number of things - so want to make sure I know what you mean
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:09 PM
Dec 2013

That's why i asked.

Bryant

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
24. I wonder, which is why I ask.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:12 PM
Dec 2013

Now I question if I should have identified myself as female. Perhaps your response would have been different. But I don't know that for sure...

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
25. Probably would have been the same - but what would be the significance
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:14 PM
Dec 2013

if everybody were male?

Bryant

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
30. I see what you are saying. Males like myself are insensitive to the vast cruelties of TPP
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:22 PM
Dec 2013

We want to focus on Porn instead of realizing that TPP will hurt real people real women real men and real children.

Bryant

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
32. Goodness! Don't put too fine a point on this, Bryant! Really!
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:24 PM
Dec 2013

Hey, calm down, not offense intended....just an observation...I thought it was interesting...

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
38. wrong. I count three females I know of before you posted
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:58 PM
Dec 2013

but people make assumptions about gender here a lot.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)
58. Oh, uhmmm, ehhh, well...
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:33 PM
Dec 2013

I was here for the TPP discussion and uh, the articles. Yes, that's it, the articles.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
18. I suspect this is, in part, because there are many conflicting opinions on porn
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:07 PM
Dec 2013

Whereas everyone hates the TPP

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
33. That seems to be the default reply, but it's also accompanied by a forfeit
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:28 PM
Dec 2013

Not saying you have forfeited on TPP but reading through, others have.

Already 130 members of congress (current, past, and bipartisan) have asked for more transparency which would derail Obama's wish to fast track the agreement.

Can't we influence our congressional reps anymore?

Here's who have signed the letter.

http://www.publicknowledge.org/files/TPP%20Letter%20FINAL.pdf

That was 2012. Since there's bipartisan opposition, I urge folks to get on the phone. The media is complicit in this. We can't be.



 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
21. Perhaps the TPP is less controversial
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:09 PM
Dec 2013

Virtually all DUers are against it, I believe.

So nothing to argue about.

But your point is well taken, it would be good to get some energy into destroying the infernal partnership.

FreeJoe

(1,039 posts)
26. To be fair...
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:16 PM
Dec 2013

I created a thread about the TPP and porn. I would have included JFK conspiracies, but I was afraid of drawing unwanted attention.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024117820

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
34. To be fair to whom?
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:35 PM
Dec 2013

I applaud you for starting a thread about TPP.

My post isn't about you. It's about the reply counts, or lack thereof, to the TPP threads.

So, who are you asking I "be fair" to? westerebus?

westerebus + TPP = 0 posts

https://www.google.com/search?q=westerebus+TPP&sitesearch=democraticunderground.com

westerebus

(2,976 posts)
76. October 2 2013 economy group
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:08 AM
Dec 2013

October 5 2013 economy group

August 2013 GD

Some times Google isn't that accurate.

Those would be replies.

I did a search my posts. 1 Nov 2012 to present.

To be fair, I thought there would be a few more.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
37. Porn Posts have always been popular here on DU. We have many libertarians
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:55 PM
Dec 2013

who vote Democratic. Porn Freedom is a huge issue with them along with Violent Video Games.

They've always been here and vocal about their stands. When there's a vacuum of posts on Progressive Dem Issues...they fill in with their priorities.

On Edit: I've been here since 2001.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
40. who are libertarians here who vote Democratic?
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:01 PM
Dec 2013

Free speech and honest research are Democratic positions.

This seems to be a new meme on DU, however. Anyone who disagrees with someone is a libertarian, not a Democrat. I also saw it in relation to the Snowden threads.

Not to say there aren't libertarians here.

But it is to say that Democrats have traditionally been aligned with the ACLU while conservatives have been opposed.

There are conservatives within the Democratic Party who vote with the Democrats while they are social conservatives, however.

 

CorrectOfCenter

(101 posts)
31. I'd rather hear about the issues that matter to most Americans:
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:22 PM
Dec 2013

Comprehensive immigration reform, expanded background checks on guns, raising the minimum wage and averting another government shutdown should be top priorities for all Democrats.

These sideshow issues are distractions from the core agenda of our party.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
35. You would think stopping the biggest corporate coup since Citizens United would be one too.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:43 PM
Dec 2013

Because good luck to labor and any sort of minimum wage increase if corporate America gets even more power through TPP.

Defeating that should be a core principle. Corporate power and influence have done nothing but denigrate progressive ideas.

Revanchist

(1,375 posts)
36. It would be interesting to see how many views the threads had also.
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 08:50 PM
Dec 2013

Maybe they aren't talking in the threads but if they are reading them and coming away with information that they can use elsewhere at least that would be something. On the other hand if people don't respond to the TPP threads than they will quickly drop down on the page and be missed by others.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
54. I think people care about a lot of posts/issues even when they don't comment
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:24 PM
Dec 2013

Sometimes when I'm here, all I do is read threads b/c I don't want to get caught up in some discussion. I may not have something to say about the issue but I value the expertise others bring.

That's not just about education, but other issues, as well.

So, I encourage people to post about the issues they follow, even if they don't get a lot of response - because, as noted elsewhere, it's the controversy between posters here that often determines replies, etc.

I've filtered out some of the frivolous topics so I don't even see them... the word "Kardashian" for instance. Celebrity threads aren't interesting to me overall, so a lot of them are trashed.

Don't be discouraged. People are also reading about serious issues.

upi402

(16,854 posts)
62. Oh gawd KICK and REC!!!! +1,000,000,000
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:48 PM
Dec 2013

This does NOT surprise me. I grieve the loss that the 'New Democrats' have caused ...

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
63. I never reply to porn threads...
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 09:53 PM
Dec 2013

They are far down on my list of 'things to work on'.

I have strong opinions - as do MANY - but right now there are bigger things at risk of 'falling off the plate'.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
68. On a typical day, I converse much more about work than politics
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:25 PM
Dec 2013

On a typical day, I converse much more about work and family than politics.

That too is something better than Obama could have hoped for... or do we rationalize a distinction without a difference once the veil is raised and we're forced to realize that social issues and political issues are both predicated on the same foundation?

However, I do understand the desire to "keep score" to find a more secure justification in our judgements of what should, or should not be spoken of, and to what degree-- it certainly allows us a delicious self-validating (though visceral) image of ourselves.

Kaleva

(36,327 posts)
73. How many different people have posted in the porn threads?
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 10:38 PM
Dec 2013

While there are quite a few posts in those threads, is it pretty much a relative few doing most of the arguing?

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
77. not yet
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:17 AM
Dec 2013

but just to let you know - if you don't want to ban porn, you're a libertarian and no liberal has ever supported 1st amendment rights...

funny, but I doubt anyone on DU has something equally stupid to say about the TPP - which is why the other threads are more active.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
78. oh yes, the evil Obama and Clinton are clouding our minds with porn threads.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:24 AM
Dec 2013

one of the stupidest OPs I have ever seen on DU, in twelve years...

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
82. As George Carlin once said
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 06:49 PM
Dec 2013

Like a guy who tells you the King of Sweden is using his dick as a radio transmitter to send anti-semitic lesbian meatloaf recipes to Soupy Sales and Marvin Hamlisch.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
83. Practically everyone on DU agrees about the TPP being a bad thing.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:51 PM
Dec 2013

That doesn't leave much point to discussion.

By contrast, porn is one of the relatively few subjects where DU is more than an echo chamber.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
85. It's much harder for people to get intellectually worked-up over TPP/TPIP...
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 07:59 PM
Dec 2013

than it is to get worked up over T&A.

One of these topics is far more gut-level than the other which requires the significant expenditure of intellectual capital to discuss knowledgeably.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
92. Not really...
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:03 AM
Dec 2013

...the only thing people need to know right now is that the president wants it fast tracked. That can't happen. You don't have to know anything they're discussing secretly.

It's all about TPP being fast tracked.

Pulling back the veil of secrecy will follow.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
93. Well, yes.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 12:19 AM
Dec 2013

I know that. I've been harassing my congresspeople to kill fast-track and to oppose it altogether if it's as bad as rumored.

The problem is when you're discussing it with someone completely unaware of it and supportive of the President, you have to answer questions like "Why shouldn't it be fast-tracked?" (Because we don't know what's in it.) "But I trust the President." (Irrelevant, if it wasn't full of things that they don't want you to know about before it passes...they'd be a lot more transparent about what it says and not trying to ram it through without discussion and review.) Worse if they know what it's rumored or partially-known to contain and want to argue those details...that's hard for most people who haven't read the leaked files and been following the sordid mess.

It does on some level require at least a bit of nebbish knowledge of the whole process to date or why fast-track is never a good idea for multi-party FTAs. Anybody can have an opinion on porn, even if they're poorly informed.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
95. We do know this much about what's in TPP...
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 03:50 PM
Dec 2013

Of the 29 chapters in this document, only five cover traditional trade matters! The other chapters amount to a devilish "partnership" for corporate protectionism:

—Food safety. Any of our government's food safety regulations (on pesticide levels, bacterial contamination, fecal exposure, toxic additives, etc.) and food labeling laws (organic, country-of-origin, animal-welfare approved, GMO-free, etc.) that are stricter than "international standards" could be ruled as "illegal trade barriers." Our government would then have to revise our consumer protections to comply with weaker standards.

—Fracking. Our Department of Energy would lose its authority to regulate exports of natural gas to any TPP nation. This would create an explosion of the destructive fracking process across our land, for both foreign and U.S. corporations could export fracked gas from America to member nations without any DOE review of the environmental and economic impacts on local communities -- or on our national interests.

—Jobs. US corporations would get special foreign-investor protections to limit the cost and risk of relocating their factories to low-wage nations that sign onto this agreement. So, an American corporation thinking about moving a factory would know it is guaranteed a sweetheart deal if it moves operations to a TPP nation like Vietnam. This would be an incentive for corporate chieftains to export more of our middle-class jobs.

—Drug prices. Big Pharma would be given more years of monopoly pricing on each of their patents and be empowered to block distribution of cheaper generic drugs. Besides artificially keeping everyone's prices high, this would be a death sentence to many people suffering from cancer, HIV, AIDS, tuberculosis and other treatable diseases in impoverished lands.

—Banksters. Wall Street and the financial giants in other TPP countries would make out like bandits. The deal explicitly prohibits transaction taxes (such as the proposed Robin Hood Tax here) that would shut down speculators who have repeatedly triggered financial crises and economic crashes around the world. It restricts "firewall" reforms that separate consumer banking from risky investment banking. It could roll back reforms that governments adopted to fix the extreme bank-deregulation regimen that caused Wall Street's 2007 crash. And it provides an escape from national rules that would limit the size of "too-big-to-fail" behemoths.

—Internet freedom. Corporations hoping to lock up and monopolize the Internet failed in Congress last year to pass their repressive "Stop Online Piracy Act." However, they've slipped SOPA's most pernicious provisions into TPP. The deal would also transform Internet service providers into a private, Big Brother police force, empowered to monitor our "user activity," arbitrarily take down our content and cut off our access to the Internet. To top that off, consumers could be assessed mandatory fines for something as benign as sending your mom a recipe you got off of a paid site.

http://www.alternet.org/corporate-accountability-and-workplace/corporate-coup-disguise

And we know who the architects are...

Petition: Don't Let the 0.1% Fast Track a Corporate Coup; Stop the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Secret Negotiations

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/dont-let-the-01-fast.fb40?r_by=5373960

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
97. I think a lot of people see it like NAFTA
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 08:11 PM
Dec 2013

...which both sides of the aisle were glad to implement.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
91. DUfail
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:59 PM
Dec 2013

We need to do some re-evaluating here. Great. I can live as a homeless, jobless pauper. At least I can still get my pr0n.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU: porn vs TPP