Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSustainable Economics
http://sustainableman.org/infobox/sustainable-economics/Our present economic system predicated on continuous, exponential growth is driving all of us towards a precipice. The entire economy is based on money created from interest-bearing debt which compels society into a grow or die situation. If we continue to grow the economy, we must consume more and more resources at an exponential rate. This means exponential rates in natural resource consumption, waste generation, population growth, biodiversity loss. If we do not grow the economy, debts cannot be repaid, bankruptcies loom, and production grinds to a halt. These are the only two options with the current system, both of which are disasters for humankind. Furthermore, the trend of increasing automation of production displaces workers and upsets the labor-for-income game at the very heart of capitalistic society. We simply need fewer and fewer people to work to provide ever higher amounts of output. So we encourage people to consume for no better reason than for the health of the economy. This is absurd and I think most people know it. Put simply, we must evolve.
Any new economic system must be a form of steady-state economics, one that utilizes interest-free money so economies are not under a pressure to grow. Most likely, there will be many different kinds of economies in a gradual transition to a world based on access (instead of ownership). The sharing economy helps people recognizing the inherent inefficiencies in ownership by helping them to utilize their resources more efficiently. Gift economies embody our natural desire to give and help to route resources to real needs, not through a government redistribution scheme but by recognizing collectively that when we give, we also receive the gift of gratitude. Resource-based economies put the focus back on the most efficient use of resources given the sustainable yield of local ecosystems.
Sustainable economics is not limited to just these ideas. Indeed, we are in dire need of new ideas. Time banks, LETS systems, local currencies, transition towns, social dividends, shifting taxation from income to natural resources are all some of the ways to transition out of the highly consumptive society and into resilient, local communities based on foundations of trust and interconnection. Remember, the only thing that gives a system power is people believing in the systems stories. If we no longer believe in the story of growth, we can, as Gandhi says, begin to be the change we want to see in the world.
This pillar explores many ideas related to sustainable economics, documents successes and failures, as well as ways to integrate them into our every day lives.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 686 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sustainable Economics (Original Post)
Scuba
Nov 2013
OP
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)1. K&R Cooperation over coercion, what a radical concept.
Very slowly, more and more people are beginning to see where this path leads and noticing that there are many other paths we could be taking.
BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)2. A positive post with a non-screeching headline
= bound to sink in GD. What were you thinking??
Kidding, it's way past time "we" started articulating a vision of what the future could look like. We all know the current corporate vision is rather bleak.
The best thing about transitioning is we can start doing it now, without asking anyone. A lateral revolution, as Rifkin calls it.
Bookmarked, thanks for posting!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. Screeching headlines are what I'm best at, but this seemed to warrant a calmer approach.