Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoa! Sounds like Harry is ready to pull the nuclear trigger on filibusters: (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Nov 2013 OP
I sure hope so... whttevrr Nov 2013 #1
Good, now maybe Pelosi can put impeachment back on the table for Bush lame54 Nov 2013 #2
Whoa! Shit's about to get real!! renie408 Nov 2013 #3
What issue before the Senate in particular is he referencing? KittyWampus Nov 2013 #4
Not confirming Judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Lochloosa Nov 2013 #11
Warren explained it as nullification: freshwest Nov 2013 #20
Wild applause ^^^^ ffr Nov 2013 #23
I thought I heard this morning spartan61 Nov 2013 #5
Only Judicial and Executive Nominations Nictuku Nov 2013 #9
Push the button Frank Blue Owl Nov 2013 #6
Great. And only a year away... vi5 Nov 2013 #7
the GOP will do it if they take the senate anyway scheming daemons Nov 2013 #10
for sure! napkinz Nov 2013 #18
I'm betting they never retake it again. They are fading fast. AAO Nov 2013 #22
I agree but napkinz Nov 2013 #24
And I agree with you! AAO Nov 2013 #33
I agree. But if that's the case..... vi5 Nov 2013 #34
This change isn't for legislation. jeff47 Nov 2013 #31
Great timing, Harry. ladyVet Nov 2013 #8
the opposite is true scheming daemons Nov 2013 #13
Yes, just roll over one more time and the Pukes will scratch our tummies hatrack Nov 2013 #19
Uh....I think the poster was saying the opposite.... vi5 Nov 2013 #35
wtf are you talking about? CatWoman Nov 2013 #27
Yup. HappyMe Nov 2013 #29
Bye bye "Obstructionist Republicans" argument if this passes. karadax Nov 2013 #12
not true scheming daemons Nov 2013 #15
Not sure who the "you guys" comment is directed at tkmorris Nov 2013 #21
I'm concerned about it because of what the GOP will do if they get a majority. Irrelevant then... freshwest Nov 2013 #25
And that Republican majority wouldn't "go nuclear" to do this because........? jeff47 Nov 2013 #32
A-fricken-men! n/t Lugnut Nov 2013 #14
About time malaise Nov 2013 #16
The Turtle Speak-th! Lint Head Nov 2013 #17
Reporter on MSNBC just said that Levin and Skidmore Nov 2013 #26
Other Senator is likely Baucus brooklynite Nov 2013 #30
Mitch, you want facts? napkinz Nov 2013 #28

Lochloosa

(16,066 posts)
11. Not confirming Judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 11:59 AM
Nov 2013

They have blocked 3 nominees so far that I'm aware of.

spartan61

(2,091 posts)
5. I thought I heard this morning
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 11:52 AM
Nov 2013

that the nuclear option would only be for filibusters for judicial nominees. Did anyone else hear that?

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
7. Great. And only a year away...
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 11:56 AM
Nov 2013

...from the risk or at least possibility of losing the majority.

I was in favor of him doing this, but any point during the previous 5 years the same thing could have been done and it would have garnered the same reaction and fainting couch antics on the right, but it would have helped more legislation pass and it would have enabled better legislation to pass. It would have resulted in better appointments being made (judicial, amabassadors, cabinet, etc.).



napkinz

(17,199 posts)
24. I agree but
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:02 PM
Nov 2013

... the point is, should they ever retake the Senate, they WILL do away with the filibuster, regardless of what Harry does today.

The GOP talks about blowing up the rules.

The GOP has been blowing up the rules for years now. Protocol and compromise have been expunged from their vocabulary.



 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
34. I agree. But if that's the case.....
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:31 PM
Nov 2013

...which it is, then we should have done it sooner and gotten through more and better legislation and more and better judicial appointments.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
31. This change isn't for legislation.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:36 PM
Nov 2013

It's only for judicial and executive nominees, except for the SCOTUS. Legislation and SCOTUS nominations can still be filibustered.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
13. the opposite is true
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 12:02 PM
Nov 2013

Filibuster reform will allow senate to get shit done, which will make it likelier that we hold the senate.

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
19. Yes, just roll over one more time and the Pukes will scratch our tummies
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 12:15 PM
Nov 2013

They might even like us if we just do what they want.

Wake up.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
35. Uh....I think the poster was saying the opposite....
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:32 PM
Nov 2013

I said the same thing above. Not that we shouldn't do it now, it's that we should have done it much SOONER if we were going to do it at all.

karadax

(284 posts)
12. Bye bye "Obstructionist Republicans" argument if this passes.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 12:01 PM
Nov 2013

This is a bad idea. It gives Republicans more fuel to toss on the fire.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
15. not true
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 12:04 PM
Nov 2013

A) the obstruction in the house is still there

B) this only affects appointments, not legislation.


All the wailing from "supposed" liberals when the Democrats show a spine is amusing to me.

Can you guys be more transparent?

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
21. Not sure who the "you guys" comment is directed at
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 12:26 PM
Nov 2013

For some reason you single out "supposed" Liberals, but the guy you are responding to has all of 38 posts here. I dunno who he is and I'm betting you don't either.

As for the swipe at Liberals, I am an unabashed one and I have been bitching at Reid to pull this trigger for years, and would be absolutely delighted if he does so now.

Maybe this isn't the best topic or place to start bashing Liberals, especially when your argument leaks like a rusty sieve.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
25. I'm concerned about it because of what the GOP will do if they get a majority. Irrelevant then...
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:03 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:13 PM - Edit history (2)

But if they do, we can kiss Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, ACA, EPA and every other thing that came from or grew out of the New Deal goodbye forever.

These fascists are not playing around and they are very close to dividing this nation up into little Koch kingdoms. Complacency or bickering is not the answer to 2014.

Lose that and there are red states aplenty who can and will call for a Constitutional convention to repeal all the amendments after the 10th. All they need is 38 states with GOP majority in their state houses to overrule the millions of us who don't live in those states, while they grind their own citizenry under crony capitalism and theocracy.

The nihilism of the right and the left will meet under the guise of rooting out their special demons, welcoming a new way of doing things, or so they think. Only to be swept away by media propaganda, by, for and of the rich only. We see this more and more, they won't stop while the ultimate prize they want, the federal government is up for grabs. Which is what a Constitutional convention does.

Americans have lived under those protections such as the 14th enshrined, Birthright Citizenship, Due Process and Equal Protection Under the Law, with they entail and the laws that have been based on them. Those go all the way through women's right to vote, and have been in place for so long they believe they are a written in stone. The GOP wants the Articles of Confederation back.

Even the first ten amendments did not end slavery, period, but the Tenthers don't care. The first ten did not allow full suffrage. They did not allow women any control of their bodies. It did not allow direct elections. The GOP does not want that, they want the rich and powerful to be in charge of that process. These facts are conveniently left out in diatribes about privacy and civil liberties.

The left is in denial, thinking that cheering media mockery was sufficient. It never was, it was added into politics to divide and not find solutions. They ignored the clear voices from the right on their intentions, national personhood laws, right to work laws with no minimum wage, voting rights, regulations, ending all the social safety net.

Both extremes now revel in the destruction of the old ways they mock, as Democrats comfort themselves with the notion 'wiser heads will prevail' and walk away from their civic responsibility. They have decided they don't need to show up in local and state elections to affect regional policy and then the national policy.

One example of many, charter schools and other regressive institutions didn't come out of D.C., no matter who wants to point the finger there. D.C. is reacting to the reality on the ground in the states, being voted in by supporters of theocracy and maniacs put in state office in yearly and the midterms.

The 2010 midterm virtually destroyed this nation, and those put in office by propaganda have not slowed their agenda, as the money keeps pouring in to buy new adherents. Those who didn't vote for reasons they have now forgotten, still point fingers upward, and it changes nothing.

Reid has been rightfully afraid of changing the rules. He is not a coward, he is a realist. He has seen these maniacs up close; we only see glimpses. This is a clever form of treason in slow motion and Reid gets no help from the sleeping public who doesn't vote to replace these demagogues.

Ryan's plan is close to reality, with calls for a Constitutional convention. The GOP will rewrite the nation's legal framework according to the ALEC model. It will be full fascist rule, nowhere to turn for redress. People will be forced to deal with those who expect a bribe to be paid to do anything. For those without the money to bribe, they will get nothing and likely lose all they have.

People have been asleep at the ballot for too long, falling for the media tactics and not voting, being distracted by anything to demoralize us. We haven't seen anything yet and it is coming. If we lose in 2014, that's it for me, I won't even bother to talk about any of it anymore.


jeff47

(26,549 posts)
32. And that Republican majority wouldn't "go nuclear" to do this because........?
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:39 PM
Nov 2013

The giant hole in your "concern" is that Republican majority you fear could also change the rules.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
26. Reporter on MSNBC just said that Levin and
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:06 PM
Nov 2013

another Dem are holdouts on this vote. Perhaps we can help with that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoa! Sounds like Harry i...