General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat are the potential consequences for States refusing the DOD orders re: equal rights?
What happens to those defiant states that will not issue spousal ID cards to same sex couples?
Are there penalties in place that can be brought into play? We're talking the military here. Surely insurrection and refusal to obey lawful orders have some consequences...
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I don't have anything issued by my state which indicates I'm married. I have a marriage certificate from some other state, but what is a "spousal ID card"?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)issued to married military families to extend benefits to spouses at military facilities...(etc)
The rights enumerated here:
http://www.military.com/spouse/military-life/newbies-and-brides/checklist-for-new-military-spouses.html
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)littlewolf
(3,813 posts)the base does. and since they are all under DoD, they will issue said cards,
as long as you have the correct paperwork.
the states do not have anything to do with anything.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)to a nearby (or nearest) federal facility and get a card. They shouldn't have to travel to do so since military ID machines are located in NG units. And it's a petty and vindictive act to make them to do so. Some would have to travel long hours there and back just to get an ID. Straight couples can get their ID locally and it is insulting to force same-sex couples to do otherwise.
Some states are telling NG facilities to not issue ID cards at the NG unit. They're claiming state law (anti-equality) prevents them from doing so. But it's really just them being petty little bigots.
I don't know what the federal government will do to enforce the measure.
Federal funds to those states NG units can be cut and since federal funding is the primary funding for National Guard units, that would be a blow.
I do know there is a December 1 deadline for the states still refusing to issue ID for NG dependents. This deadline applies to the NG commanders and NG facilities (of all states) and was issued from the Chief of NG Bureau. They must have a plan in place by then for being in compliance to the DoD directive.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)They are counting it as compliance if benefits are available in-state, even if not at state-owned facilities.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/11/19/guard-state-holdouts-will-issue-same-sex-ids.html?comp=7000023317828&rank=1
ThinkProgress noted about the status of Oklahoma:
Because all of Oklahomas National Guard ID-printing machines are now in place and operating on federal properties, the state is technically considered to be in compliance with federal directives. Married couples can only apply for benefits at those federal facilities, and not at any of the state-owned facilities.
Update
Gov. Fallin has tried to distance herself from this story, using social media to say, To set the record straight no National Guardsman in Oklahoma is being denied marriage benefits. Stories that suggest otherwise are false. This is technically true, but those benefits can now only be obtained at federal facilities in Oklahoma, which could require couples to drive extended distances even when there are are state facilities closer by.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/11/19/2970531/oklahoma-national-guard/
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Instead of doing the right thing and issuing the IDs from the local NG HQ, some states are making everyone go to a federal facility.
In some states, such as the one I live in, that would mean a 8-12 hour drive there and back for many. Not counting the time needed to get the ID. When before the ID were issued locally. It's a mean and petty act on the part of the states.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)If so, this action would be without consequence...
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)If a state is in noncompliance. Expect the shit to hit the fan fairly quick. DOD can freeze funds to a state's NG.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Depends on how funds are earmarked, I'd guess. If the DoD has control over their funds once gained then the DoD could do it.