General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat do you think of the IRS receiving the penalties for those who choose not to get healthcare?
I spoke with someone on the phone about the ACA and as a final question, I asked, "What happens to all the money from the penalties?" I was surprised to hear that the IRS gets it. It would seem to me that the money from penalties should be going to a fund to further the ACA... for instance, to help expand Medicaid in the states that didn't... as sort of a federal fund that would help people impacted by their states' decision not to expand Medicaid.... Or to buy medications at reduced prices, or to go into a general fund for disaster relief... or to help hospitals?
Has anyone heard about any such measures or is it really going into the IRS.... and what would the IRS do with it?
Just curious.
wercal
(1,370 posts)IRS collected money goes into the general fund, and is doled out to various agencies, as congress sees fit.
The ACA that was scored by the CBO was supposed to be solvent for the first ten years...this scoring assumed that the penalties would be used to subsidize low income policy holders. So that is where the money is earmarked to go.
There won't be a federal expansion of Medicaid. In fact, the ACA only subsidizes expanded Medicaid for two years in the states that elected to expand it - from then out it is a state budget responsibility.
And currently, I don't think there will be a windfall of money to put into a disaster relief fund or anything like that. The fines are probably going to fall short of what is needed for the subsidies...yesterday Jay Carney hinted that subsidies would be expanded, to help put a stop to the "I lost my insurance" stories.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)They pay 100% for a short while, then 90% of the expansion long term.
thecrow
(5,519 posts)Hopefully they will be better informed in the future.Thank you.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Lasher
(27,597 posts)Just green pieces of paper with pictures of dead presidents on them.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)I do think using it to help people impacted by their states' decision not to expand Medicaid is a great idea.
Keefer
(713 posts)It wouldn't be a tax. It would be a fine. Therefor it wouldn't have been constitutional.
Lasher
(27,597 posts)You don't say much but when you do you make it count.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)so rich people can maximize their happiness without being burdened by the poor - all in a good cause, thecrow. The most American of all good causes.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to the federal government for its spending needs, including implementing the ACA.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)I am so sure that something/someone does not have the President's best interests at heart. I have the feeling that they want to make his life so hard that he will resign..
Now who would be that conniving?
.