Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,844 posts)
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 11:04 PM Nov 2013

If the Washington Post could show that Davies was lying, why couldn't 60 Minutes?

don't you love the expressions 'mistaken' and 'flawed' story....?


CBS News’s chairman expressed disappointment and contrition Friday for a mistaken “60 Minutes” report about the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks, but he suggested the program and his network intended to move past the flawed story.


“Credibility is really the most important thing we have,” Jeff Fager, the head of the network’s news division and executive producer of the weekly newsmagazine, said in an interview. “Did we let people down? Yes. Do people expect us to get it right? Of course they do. Do they expect us to be perfect? I don’t think so. When you come forward and admit a mistake, people will understand.”


The truth began to emerge last week when The Washington Post reported that Davies had told his employer, a British security company called Blue Mountain Group, that he had been nowhere near the compound on the night it was attacked. The New York Times reported late Thursday that Davies had made similar statements to the FBI, further clouding the account he gave to Logan and CBS. CBS said Davies’s FBI interviews prompted its apology and retraction.

In addition, “60 Minutes” failed to disclose that Davies had written a book about his alleged experiences that was published by a division of Simon and Schuster, which is owned by CBS. The publisher said Friday it is withdrawing the book, called “The Embassy House: The Explosive Eyewitness Account of the Libyan Embassy Siege by the Soldier Who Was There.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/60-minutes-apologizes-for-benghazi-report/2013/11/08/6e7b6b9a-487e-11e3-a196-3544a03c2351_story.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the Washington Post could show that Davies was lying, why couldn't 60 Minutes? (Original Post) spanone Nov 2013 OP
the only possible conclusion is that CBS had an agenda grasswire Nov 2013 #1
The lead reporter also has an agenda... truebluegreen Nov 2013 #2
well they certainly didn't vet davies. that alone speaks volumes spanone Nov 2013 #3
They didn't think they'd get tagged on it. shraby Nov 2013 #4

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
1. the only possible conclusion is that CBS had an agenda
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 11:12 PM
Nov 2013

A political agenda.

And they have a news executive who came from FOX.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Washington Post co...