Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the Washington Post could show that Davies was lying, why couldn't 60 Minutes?
don't you love the expressions 'mistaken' and 'flawed' story....?
CBS Newss chairman expressed disappointment and contrition Friday for a mistaken 60 Minutes report about the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks, but he suggested the program and his network intended to move past the flawed story.
Credibility is really the most important thing we have, Jeff Fager, the head of the networks news division and executive producer of the weekly newsmagazine, said in an interview. Did we let people down? Yes. Do people expect us to get it right? Of course they do. Do they expect us to be perfect? I dont think so. When you come forward and admit a mistake, people will understand.
The truth began to emerge last week when The Washington Post reported that Davies had told his employer, a British security company called Blue Mountain Group, that he had been nowhere near the compound on the night it was attacked. The New York Times reported late Thursday that Davies had made similar statements to the FBI, further clouding the account he gave to Logan and CBS. CBS said Daviess FBI interviews prompted its apology and retraction.
In addition, 60 Minutes failed to disclose that Davies had written a book about his alleged experiences that was published by a division of Simon and Schuster, which is owned by CBS. The publisher said Friday it is withdrawing the book, called The Embassy House: The Explosive Eyewitness Account of the Libyan Embassy Siege by the Soldier Who Was There.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/60-minutes-apologizes-for-benghazi-report/2013/11/08/6e7b6b9a-487e-11e3-a196-3544a03c2351_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 688 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the Washington Post could show that Davies was lying, why couldn't 60 Minutes? (Original Post)
spanone
Nov 2013
OP
grasswire
(50,130 posts)1. the only possible conclusion is that CBS had an agenda
A political agenda.
And they have a news executive who came from FOX.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)2. The lead reporter also has an agenda...
not a good combination.
spanone
(135,844 posts)3. well they certainly didn't vet davies. that alone speaks volumes
shraby
(21,946 posts)4. They didn't think they'd get tagged on it.