So Lara Logan of 60 Minutes was getting

[applegrove]

some of her information from the liar. She didn't get any information from the FBI apparently. So who were her other sources? And do we have a right to know? Was it the GOP?

[Tx4obama]

1. An interesting article on the link below

Here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/jeff-fager-benghazi-60-minutes_n_4242457.html

[applegrove]

2. Thanks. One would think they would

Last edited Sat Nov 9, 2013, 04:38 AM - Edit history (1)

have used more than one source to confirm the story.

[Trekologer]

6. The fact that he admitted lying about one of the stories should have been a red flag

The question that "60 Minutes" didn't answer was which story was the lie? They accepted the liar's tale that the story he was giving him wasn't the lie, which was another lie.

Moral of the story: lying liars lie. And lying liars lie about lying.

[Atman]

3. I just don't get how they can call themselves "journalists"...

If they rely on reading third-party, outside sources instead of actually INVESTIGATING! It appears as if the depth of their "reporting" was to have some guy sit and tell them a story.

Remember the old days of 60 Minutes when Mike Wallace and a camera crew would show up at a crook's door with proof that he was a crook, and put his feet to the fire? Now they just do fluffy human interest stories and cross-promotional deals for books and movies they're hawking.

[spanone]

7. lazy 'journalism' isn't journalism. 60 minutes is dead to me.

[Sunlei]

4. the big liar was OUR Gov. contractor, so perhaps the liar should lose all his contracts.

The USA doesn't need people like that working in other countries. Who knows he could have been behind the small attack and fire at that building. The fire that gave the ambassador smoke inhalation that killed him.

[elehhhhna]

5. LL is a mhack and that is not news.