General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP loses its appetite for contraception fight (updated)
Last edited Wed Mar 7, 2012, 05:11 PM - Edit history (1)
By Steve Benen
After the Senate narrowly defeated the anti-contraception Blunt Amendment last week, Republicans said they weren't prepared to give up the fight. On the contrary, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) vowed to keep pushing restrictions, eyeing "a couple" of possible legislative remedies. The Senate GOP made similar noises, with Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) declaring, "This issue will not go away."
A week later, Republicans are ready to see the issue go away.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who regrets her vote for the Blunt Amendment, is now willing to say on the record her party is badly off track by even "having a conversation" about contraception access. Even Blunt himself told Sahil Kapur yesterday that the upper chamber is likely to shift its attention elsewhere.
<...>
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) added that it seems Republicans realize the contraception fight "hasn't served them well."
Immediately after the vote on his measure, Blunt told reporters the fight "is not over," but six days and a Rush Limbaugh scandal later, that vow is looking pretty shaky.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/07/10600448-gop-loses-its-appetite-for-contraception-fight
Updated to add:
By Alex Seitz-Wald
Former Republican Hawaii governor Linda Lingle, who is running for Senate in the state, said this morning that she opposes an amendment pushed by Senate Republicans last week that would allow any employer to drop health insurance coverage for contraception and other health services on moral grounds.
In a statement, Lingles campaign manager said she shares the position of her Democratic opponent, opposing the amendment sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO). Governor Lingle and (Democrat) Mazie Hirono share the same position on the Blunt amendment, the statement said. (N)either supports the broadly crafted language of the amendment.
<...>
Lingle joins Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), who voted against the Blunt amendment, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who said yesterday that she regrets her vote for the measure, in publicly criticizing the Blunt legislation. It was narrowly defeated on a near party-line vote last week.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/07/439650/linda-lingle-blunt-amendment/
The Republican Party is having a meltdown
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002377092
liberal N proud
(60,340 posts)democrat_patriot
(2,774 posts)The Republican party does not help women. Ever.
I always ask Republicans - name one SPECIFIC instance where Republicans helped women. Just one. Crickets every time....
peace frog
(5,609 posts)Forget, HELL! It doesn't end here, we'll take our fury to the ballot box and beyond. WE WILL NEVER LET THEM FORGET.
sinkingfeeling
(51,471 posts)IndyJones
(1,068 posts)balls responses to what Rush said. I'd also like to hear them talk about how they would vote on the Blunt-Rubio Amendment - Gingrich, Romney, and Paul.
Bake
(21,977 posts)Typical.
Bake
MineralMan
(146,325 posts)I know...let's get them to try to make masturbation illegal, with heavy prison sentences.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)MineralMan
(146,325 posts)A little education appears to be in order, I'd say.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)MineralMan
(146,325 posts)Get the bible a'bangin' away, and fire up the old myths about it. Masturbation makes you feeble-minded, you know. All that hairy palms stuff. It would go like this, I think:
Let me tell you: I've been doing extensive research into the subject of masturbation. I've actually seen hundreds of videos of young women in the throes of captivity to this evil practice. I've seen the expressions on their faces. I'm sure there are videos of young men doing the same thing, but I'd never lower myself to view such filth. I can imagine it, and deplore it without having to watch such things.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)but that it would, sadly, be unenforceable.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)whack job religious fanatics into office to pass the bill or to nibble at the edges in the states.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Really?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)hell, yes, they thought this was a brilliant idea.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)It never quite materialized. Did you hear how loudly Jon Stewart's audience cheered when he basically told the Catholic Church to STFU because it didn't pay taxes anyway?
JHB
(37,161 posts)It's become much too public for them to sustain, but if they get the chance to do it quietly, they'll be back at it.
Nothing short of being repeatedly crushed in elections thanks to that wing will get them off it.
deacon
(5,967 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)The Republican party is the vehicle of religious fundamentalists who reject progress.
The entire Republican party owns this one.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)that there isn't more outrage over this. Most women know how bad it is. The ones I have talked to are ticked off. Men not so much. This effects them as well. If nothing else it effects their wallet if they have a bunch of kids to support because their partner can't get adaquate and inexpensive child care so that she can go to work.