General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew York City bans sale of cigarettes to under 21s
New York City (AFP) - New York City voted Wednesday to ban the sale of cigarettes, e-cigarettes and tobacco to anyone under the age of 21, raising the previous threshold of 18.
New York is the first large city to raise the age limit so high, a resolution that follows years of increasingly stringent laws on tobacco.
The federal age requirement for buying cigarettes is 18, which some states previously raised to 19.
A spokeswoman for New York City council said the proposal was approved by 35 votes to 10.
http://news.yahoo.com/york-city-bans-sale-cigarettes-under-21s-222358961.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CbdiHFS6C4AZdHQtDMD
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I used to smoke, I don't anymore, but I have been a follower.
First it's taxes, then it's selective bans, then it's regional bans, then it's an outright outlawing of a thing or things.
And just look at the governor and his attitude toward personal choices on everything from soft drinks to smoking to guns and I don't know what else.
Fascist.
Fucker.
Graybeard
(6,996 posts)Yes, that's $11 per pack.
18yr olds were paying that much? Really?
Raising taxes on cigarettes was one of Bloomberg's
first acts as Mayor in 2002.
.
beaglelover
(3,484 posts)I can get two packs of Marlboros out here in L.A. for that price!!
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)It was also the same when I lived in Florida. No big deal. It is a good law. I am a smoker but I'm all for laws to prevent minors from smoking. It is an awful habit and I have been addicted since I was 16. I am 74 now and surprisingly still alive. I have tried everything to stop even hypnosis and nothing has worked. I have tried cold turkey and was climbing the walls after the first day.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)I feel sorry for the residents of NYC. Their govt must not think that their residents are capable of making informed decisons for themselves.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)We are in fact aware that young peoples brains are still forming into their 20s and more susceptible to addictive substances.
Your sympathy is unwarranted.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Instead of leaving it to the nanny state, ir the 1% er Bloomburg.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)Tikki
beaglelover
(3,484 posts)You can die for 'Merica at 18 but can't buy a pack of Marlboros in NYC until you're 21???????????????????? Complete and utter PC bullshit. Smoking is still legal as far as I know and it doesn't impair your senses like alcohol. Why the restriction to 21??????????
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Nanny state nonsense.
If they genuinely cared about the health of young people, they would prohibit Army recruiting campaigns to send our youth to die in the Middle East.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)know that if they don't hook them by 21 they won't get them at all.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)TeamPooka
(24,226 posts)Upton
(9,709 posts)I don't smoke, but I sure am glad I don't live in NYC..
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)But I disagree with this. It is essentially drug prohibition for adults.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)alp227
(32,025 posts)By rude I mean people who blow their filth in everyone else's space.