Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:54 AM Oct 2013

Should someone with no left arm be forced to subsidize someone else's right arm surgery?

With all the hubbub about honest men being so cruelly extorted to pay for wimminfolk's elective healthcare choices (breast exams, contraception, etc.), it seemed reasonable to probe the boundaries of this line of thinking.


Let's hear it!

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should someone with no left arm be forced to subsidize someone else's right arm surgery? (Original Post) Orrex Oct 2013 OP
Yes socialism for all Skink Oct 2013 #1
i don't think you understand the basic principle of insurance bettydavis Oct 2013 #2
I don't think you understand the basic principle of irony/sarcasm HERVEPA Oct 2013 #4
Maybe not, but I loved her in "White Mama" Orrex Oct 2013 #11
Sat what? I assume you saw I was not responding to you but to HERVEPA Oct 2013 #12
No way--you're doing fine! Orrex Oct 2013 #15
Geez. I didn't see the screen name. HERVEPA Oct 2013 #18
It's Bette. And I can imagine her posting here...... msanthrope Oct 2013 #22
Well, I'm right-handed, so I don't give a shit about southpaws. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2013 #3
Sick of South bashing! Raine1967 Oct 2013 #6
don't you mean southpaw bashing? magical thyme Oct 2013 #19
A more pertinent and timely question is difficult to imagine, Orrex. sibelian Oct 2013 #5
Yes, let's all go around yelling at people wearing casts and splints and crutches. Quantess Oct 2013 #7
Yeah, half of them are FAKING it, too! Arugula Latte Oct 2013 #26
I'm forced to subsidize bad drivers or those without any car insurance. Been sinkingfeeling Oct 2013 #8
Childless RobinA Oct 2013 #9
You shouldn't have to pay property taxes either HarveyDarkey Oct 2013 #23
They act as though EC Oct 2013 #10
Since different people pay differing rates based on various artificial criteria Fumesucker Oct 2013 #21
Why the heck have insurance anyway, if you just want to pay yourself? nt bemildred Oct 2013 #13
Yes -nt Bradical79 Oct 2013 #14
I never get migranes, I don't have diabetes, high blood pressure or have had brain aneurisms. Sheepshank Oct 2013 #16
One day you might fall down the stairs Quantess Oct 2013 #17
and then I'll be thankful for ACA and it's socialistic tendencies Sheepshank Oct 2013 #31
I read your post as ambiguous, and not clearly sarcasm. Quantess Oct 2013 #32
Insurance is just meant to cover you in general terms. Rex Oct 2013 #20
lol Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #24
Armless Americans unite! BainsBane Oct 2013 #25
Yes, particularly if the lost arm was the source of this HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #27
I don't want to pay for prostate cancer exams or viagra. And I really don't want to pay OregonBlue Oct 2013 #28
I am offended that there is no policy tier called "Only the Medical Care that Squinch Needs." Squinch Oct 2013 #29
Right with you Squinch Skink Oct 2013 #30

bettydavis

(93 posts)
2. i don't think you understand the basic principle of insurance
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:19 AM
Oct 2013

People pool their money with premiums and it is dispensed to pay for damages as the occur to policy holders. All insurance is based on this principle. So to answer your question, yes. Until we have single payer, lefty will pay his premiums and they will be disbursed as needed. And if lefty's right leg gets broken maybe a double amputee may indirectly end up subsidizing the setting of his bone and the subsequent cast. that's how insurance works.

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
11. Maybe not, but I loved her in "White Mama"
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:11 PM
Oct 2013

Along with yet another fine performance by Ernie Hudson!

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
12. Sat what? I assume you saw I was not responding to you but to
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:40 PM
Oct 2013

poster who responded to you. But I realize i can't keep up with your mind.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
3. Well, I'm right-handed, so I don't give a shit about southpaws.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:23 AM
Oct 2013

Their arms can fall off for all I care!

(this is sarcasm, in case anyone is planning to alert)

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
5. A more pertinent and timely question is difficult to imagine, Orrex.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:25 AM
Oct 2013

... UNLESSS...

Should the castrated be required to pay out for the gonadically non-challenged? I'm sure you've seen the thread about that poor chap who had his assets stripped elsewhere on GD. Think how the gentleman must be feeling. Just THINK.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
7. Yes, let's all go around yelling at people wearing casts and splints and crutches.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:30 AM
Oct 2013

Those irresponsible jerks broke their bones ON MY TAB!!!
Have fun hobbling around on crutches, ya fuckin' FREELOADER!
Hey laugh it up, you in the body cast. Enjoy your month in traction, cuz I'M PAYING FOR IT!

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
26. Yeah, half of them are FAKING it, too!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:18 PM
Oct 2013

"Oh, sure, I'll just lie here in this bed in a full body cast watching "Montel" and eating bonbons all day while not going to work!" Slackers!

RobinA

(9,894 posts)
9. Childless
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:29 PM
Oct 2013

I have no children, so I refuse to pay to insure children, OR the gestation thereof. Also, no hemophiliacs in my family, so get your blood transfusions on somebody else's dime.

 

HarveyDarkey

(9,077 posts)
23. You shouldn't have to pay property taxes either
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:01 PM
Oct 2013

Most of them go to schooling other people's children.
Why should you have to pay to educate other people's children?

EC

(12,287 posts)
10. They act as though
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:04 PM
Oct 2013

insurance companies should just write policies for each individual. It's a product made to work with the average family/person, not each individual or sex.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
21. Since different people pay differing rates based on various artificial criteria
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:52 PM
Oct 2013

The idea that people can pay differing rates is already out there and accepted.

All that's happening now is determining which artificial criteria will be used.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
16. I never get migranes, I don't have diabetes, high blood pressure or have had brain aneurisms.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:52 PM
Oct 2013

I try and stay in the normal healthy weight range. I choose to get immunizations, and have NEVER had the flu, whooping cough or pertussis. I've never had my appendix out, or my tonsils.

I choose to eat healthy foods (I choose to stay away from excessive transfats and sugar), I choose to exercise, maybe that has helped avoid some of the above health issues...just a little. I am paying for all those other freeloaders that get to see the doctor with those health issues?



Socialism is great, ain't it?

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
17. One day you might fall down the stairs
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:56 PM
Oct 2013

or slip on a banana peel on your way out of the gym and need surgery to fix one or more broken bones. Surgery to fix a broken limb ain't cheap.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
31. and then I'll be thankful for ACA and it's socialistic tendencies
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 09:51 AM
Oct 2013

....I wonder if my previous post may have come across as anti ACA?

my sarcasm is loosely worded to the response on another thread that pregnancy is a choice and therefore everyone should be pissed that it's is a mandatory insurance requirement. Sorry for being so obtuse!!!

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
32. I read your post as ambiguous, and not clearly sarcasm.
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 02:17 PM
Oct 2013

Now we know for sure it was sarcasm. I was concerned that MY sarcastic post upthread wasn't obvious enough.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
20. Insurance is just meant to cover you in general terms.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:42 PM
Oct 2013

It doesn't take into account what you personally want down to the minute details of, 'I refuse to pay my premiums if any of the money goes for X Y and Z'. Just doesn't work that way.

You want insurance, you pay the premiums. This is umbrella insurance by the govt and people should be happy to get it imo.

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
28. I don't want to pay for prostate cancer exams or viagra. And I really don't want to pay
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:32 PM
Oct 2013

for treatment for sports injuries.

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
29. I am offended that there is no policy tier called "Only the Medical Care that Squinch Needs."
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:18 PM
Oct 2013

I feel oppressed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should someone with no le...