General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould someone with no left arm be forced to subsidize someone else's right arm surgery?
With all the hubbub about honest men being so cruelly extorted to pay for wimminfolk's elective healthcare choices (breast exams, contraception, etc.), it seemed reasonable to probe the boundaries of this line of thinking.
Let's hear it!
Skink
(10,122 posts)not just the banks
bettydavis
(93 posts)People pool their money with premiums and it is dispensed to pay for damages as the occur to policy holders. All insurance is based on this principle. So to answer your question, yes. Until we have single payer, lefty will pay his premiums and they will be disbursed as needed. And if lefty's right leg gets broken maybe a double amputee may indirectly end up subsidizing the setting of his bone and the subsequent cast. that's how insurance works.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Orrex
(63,216 posts)Along with yet another fine performance by Ernie Hudson!
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)poster who responded to you. But I realize i can't keep up with your mind.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)I was riffing on her screen name and Ms. Davis' long acting career.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Their arms can fall off for all I care!
(this is sarcasm, in case anyone is planning to alert)
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I'm tired of the south bashing!
(and yes for the irony impaired!)
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)... UNLESSS...
Should the castrated be required to pay out for the gonadically non-challenged? I'm sure you've seen the thread about that poor chap who had his assets stripped elsewhere on GD. Think how the gentleman must be feeling. Just THINK.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Those irresponsible jerks broke their bones ON MY TAB!!!
Have fun hobbling around on crutches, ya fuckin' FREELOADER!
Hey laugh it up, you in the body cast. Enjoy your month in traction, cuz I'M PAYING FOR IT!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)"Oh, sure, I'll just lie here in this bed in a full body cast watching "Montel" and eating bonbons all day while not going to work!" Slackers!
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)doing that for decades.
RobinA
(9,894 posts)I have no children, so I refuse to pay to insure children, OR the gestation thereof. Also, no hemophiliacs in my family, so get your blood transfusions on somebody else's dime.
HarveyDarkey
(9,077 posts)Most of them go to schooling other people's children.
Why should you have to pay to educate other people's children?
EC
(12,287 posts)insurance companies should just write policies for each individual. It's a product made to work with the average family/person, not each individual or sex.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The idea that people can pay differing rates is already out there and accepted.
All that's happening now is determining which artificial criteria will be used.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I try and stay in the normal healthy weight range. I choose to get immunizations, and have NEVER had the flu, whooping cough or pertussis. I've never had my appendix out, or my tonsils.
I choose to eat healthy foods (I choose to stay away from excessive transfats and sugar), I choose to exercise, maybe that has helped avoid some of the above health issues...just a little. I am paying for all those other freeloaders that get to see the doctor with those health issues?
Socialism is great, ain't it?
Quantess
(27,630 posts)or slip on a banana peel on your way out of the gym and need surgery to fix one or more broken bones. Surgery to fix a broken limb ain't cheap.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)....I wonder if my previous post may have come across as anti ACA?
my sarcasm is loosely worded to the response on another thread that pregnancy is a choice and therefore everyone should be pissed that it's is a mandatory insurance requirement. Sorry for being so obtuse!!!
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Now we know for sure it was sarcasm. I was concerned that MY sarcastic post upthread wasn't obvious enough.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It doesn't take into account what you personally want down to the minute details of, 'I refuse to pay my premiums if any of the money goes for X Y and Z'. Just doesn't work that way.
You want insurance, you pay the premiums. This is umbrella insurance by the govt and people should be happy to get it imo.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)for treatment for sports injuries.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)I feel oppressed.