General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI pay health insurance for lots of conditions I don't have
I pay for coverage for heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes--none of which I myself have. I pay for coverage for spinal cord injuries, bronchitis, kidney failure, and lung diseases. I pay for coverage for leukemia, breast cancer, testicular cancer, throat cancer, bone cancer, as well as lots and lots of diseases that I have been fortunate never to develop in my lifetime. I also pay for maternity coverage that I myself will never take advantage of. Why? Because that is what medical insurance is: it pools together funds across a population and spreads the risk. We never know what coverage we will eventually need, but we do know at some point in our lives we will need medical care of some type.
Why all this angst over paying for childbirth? Set aside the fact that we are liberals here who are supposed to have some concern for the broader society, as human beings we all have an interest in the propagation of the species. So what if your gender means you won't use certain types of medical services? There are a lot of medical services that, if you are fortunate, you will never need. No one uses every type of medical coverage. So what's with the belly aching about insurance companies having to cover birth control and child birth? Are the profits of the insurance companies really more important than your fellow citizens? And for those whose income is low enough to need government subsidies, why do liberals suddenly turn on each other because being female is no longer a pre-existing condition? Folks
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)after car accidents, sky-diving accidents, etc. -- which men have more of than women.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)elleng
(130,974 posts)Really,
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Recommended.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)they are just throwing out a fishing line to get some people upset.
fuck em. ignore em. fart on em.
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)I wish those who have demonstrated, numerous times, an uncontrollable urge to whine would stick a thumb in their mouths and leave it at that.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Perhaps they are just incredibly selfish?
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)K and R.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Packerowner740
(676 posts)Isn't that the definition of insurance?
I agree with you, what do they want, insurance is signed by gender?
Nine
(1,741 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)What a wonderful world!
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec.
And thank you!!
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I mean, we do all understand how the birds and bees work right? Its perfectly fair for men to pay part of the childbirth burden when it comes to the health insurance pool. If a woman gets pregnant in the typical fashion, a man was also responsible for making that happen. I think this is the only argument that people need to make when men bitch about paying for maternity coverage.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)and some of the people complaining actually have children! It's unreal.
left coaster
(1,093 posts)I point this out constantly, to people who keep acting like pregnancy/childbirth are the result of immaculate conception!
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)As a member of the human species, who would possibly be against paying for maternity & childbirth? Who?
Ok, so maybe the rabid right would oppose, but there are questions about their humanity, so they don't count. Just joking, about the humanity thing. Sort of.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)As crazy as that sounds. Here are a few. Apparently I've missed a lot over the past couple of days.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3939817
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023940422
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023938561
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think the "angst" is ... hmm, how shall I phrase it.
Maybe I shant phrase it, and will just leave the _______ to be filled in.
K&R to your OP. I agree 100%.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)It's the strangest thing.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)There is no complaint about covering breast cancer, etc. So if people are really complaining about covering childbirth, I think there is an element of pregnancy not being an illness, and being something you can choose. That is, you (usually, hopefully) choose to get pregnant, you largely have control over it, whereas you don't choose to get breast cancer. So then their argument is, hey, who said you can have a family on my dime? It's the same mind-set that is anti-welfare of all sorts.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)We aren't talking about a face lift. This is the propagation of the human species. So while I personally can get by without having a baby, society cannot do without childbirth in general.
Mind you they are also complaining about women having coverage for birth control, which takes away the choice. I haven't seen any of them saying sex is unnecessary.
Some posters on this board have decided it is a male-female thing. You'd think that women were their mortal enemies, the way some people are acting.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)re: "This is the propagation of the human species. So while I personally can get by without having a baby, society cannot do without childbirth in general. "
Babies will be born whether Obamacare covers childbirth or not. The human species is not going to die out for lack of insurance. Some of the Haves are just complaining about making it easier, safer, and healthier for the Have-Nots to reproduce. Big surprise there.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)because you're cheap? You're one of the few in this thread who has raised objection to maternity coverage. I guess you don't intend on having heterosexual sex at any point in you lifetime. If you want to wash your hands of childbirth, you can't participate in the act that creates those babies.
Of course the whole position is hypocritical since you yourself benefited from medical care upon your own birth.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)re: "You're one of the few in this thread who has raised objection to maternity coverage"
I never objected it to at all, nor would I. I explained what I thought the rationale behind the objection was, which is where I thought some of the other posts missed the mark. But then, I think made pretty obvious that I still thought the position was, shall we say, misguided.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)but from what I've read, gender is very much at the heart of this dispute, though I think that is misguided.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)take care of him- or herself and contribute to society or an unhealthy child who, although certainly a joy to many especially his or her parents, will always be dependent and lead a very limited life.
Nowadays, doctors can operate in utero (before birth) to correct a number of conditions that used to mean inevitable birth "defects."
So pre-natal care is really important.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Extended health coverage through ACA should reduce child mortality in this country.
I'm thinking you intended to respond to the other poster.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in it?
since we know it is not ONLY a woman that is involved in getting preg, though the one taking ALL the risks, how do men pay their share of conception?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)My parents bred their dog and sold the puppies to pay for the births of my sister and me.
That's not exactly practical today. The bills for each of my kids were more than $40k before insurance.
Now, in your not-paid-by-insurance world, I could presumably negotiate with the doctors and hospitals to negotiate that down. But my insurance company can negotiate much better than I can.
The alternative is some sort of cut-rate birthing center, which would presumably lead to complications that would be covered by insurance.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)It's interesting that so many focus in on pregnancy.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)Pregnancy is a condition requiring care, for which you would want coverage.
Eating, drinking, smoking, exercise, are not conditions, and so "coverage" per se does not apply. The things that may be caused by an excess of those things (in whole or in part), however, are covered... diabetes(?), liver disease, lung cancer, heart attacks.
But that does lead to an interesting question. Are weight loss treatments themselves, alcoholism treatments (detox programs), nicotine patches and the like covered?
peace13
(11,076 posts)..and education that is inferior. These things are immoral to me. So get over it kids. Insure people for all conditions. You don't get to nit pick the care of others!
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Non-liberals, however, find it a great way to start flame wars on liberal boards.
Lots of concern about the poor, disadvantaged, put upon men who now have to suffer the indignities of a more level playing field.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)but one OP is by a woman, strangely enough.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Perhaps this overt misogyny is a "tell".
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:22 AM - Edit history (2)
Sadly, that is not so. That thread, however, is a particularly strange example of it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I highly doubt there are too many men who otherwise would support the ACA, who are all of a sudden expressly concerned over this particular aspect.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)It's the strangest thing
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think you nailed it.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)And how many pregnancies and childbirths are to women who are married to men? Men who are going to have that child as part of their family?
How selfish to not be willing to allow women that coverage when they need it.
Plus, as a homeowner my property taxes go to schools and I don't have kids. There's so much we pay for that we don't use because we are a collective. It's known as the commons, we all pay in and use what we need. It's a We society instead of a Me society. (props to Thom Hartmann for those terms and the wording)
Nac Mac Feegle
(971 posts)I'll help out with your childbirth expenses if you will help out with my prostate cancer treatments.
We're all in this together.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)but it's not "my pregnancy." Do you have children? If not, you were born at some point. You've either impregnated women or used medical services to come into the world, or both. We are all in this together.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Then the human race can dwindle to its apparently well deserved (to some) demise
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)On par with cosmetic surgery. By that logic, coverage for car accidents is elective. You could have stayed in the house rather than getting in a car.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)No kids dammit, that would also solve the problem of schools--and get off my lawn---eventually it would solve all problems came to think of it. At least human ones
How can I wrap my mind around that level of.--disconnect? I can't. I just can't
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)About the screening issue and those claiming the unfairness. That is how I read his post.
or
i could be wrong, lol
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You keep eatin' those pizzas.
Why should the rest of us have to pay for all those pizzas you keep getting served?
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)As a number of conditions and diseases are preventable, or the odds of developing them reducible.
Shall we start penalizing people when they do develop them because of lifestyle choices?
I think not.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)There are vegans who have multiple sex partners. Non-smokers who ride motorcycles fast. Etc. etc.
I've always felt the most sound thing to do- not just ethically, but financially- would be to have a SPHC system; spread the risk out equally and fairly among the largest pool possible.
Certainly there are things that are detrimental to peoples' health; with something like smoking I think public education and taxes are the way to go, along with minimizing the impact of 2nd hand smoke by regulating it in indoor, public spaces- etc.
But I do think it's a fool's errand to try to pick and choose with something like insurance.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Join weight watchers, go to the gym 3 x a week, walk 10,000 steps, you get money off your health insurance. The difference is that it's a voluntary incentive; it's not discriminatory.
kcr
(15,317 posts)I haven't seen a one. But I've seen more than one of the opposite, sadly.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)It has just gone without saying that men's health care will be covered, including especially their man-parts, up to and including Viagra. Has any health care benefit plan ever excluded prostate cancer treatments?
Somehow, though, when it comes to women's lady-parts, insurers come all over squeamish and tight-pursed. A huge number of benefit plans have left it entirely to the woman to pay out of pocket for birth control, pregnancy, and childbirth.
What's wrong with this picture?
niyad
(113,348 posts)of insurance should even have to be explained. thought that concept was basic, but, apparently not. AND to discover that people are whining about women actually getting fair coverage???? beyond disgusting. sadly, though, it is not in the least surprising.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)So I guess what you need to do is total yourself.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)I looked up financial resources, what is actually happening with the ACA, but the complete illogic just made throw my hands up.
My husband has Multiple Sclerosis and is on disability, although my insurance is primary. You're paying for him as well and I thank you (and everyone else) for it
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)extremely selfish spoiled brats is what they are. They are the type that complains about paying school taxes, after their children have graduated.
I went to a school open house where a parent was complaining that the crayons she bought were for her daughter only and was upset to find out that the teacher put the crayons in the group container for groups of 4 to use. Outrage over a 30 cent box of crayons.
Some people have to be outraged over something. Selfishness seems to be leaking out of the teaparty.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)when it's so-called liberals displaying that selfishness.
gussmith
(280 posts)It is really not too well planned, this health care thing. You need a major medical on top of Medicare, then separately a dental plan, a health club plan, an eye care plan, long term care plan..... and others not on my menu.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)That is the solution to the problem you describe.
gussmith
(280 posts)We take so long to get to the solution in this country.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We don't pay for what we use. We pay just in case we might use it.
That's what insurance is about.
We pay for people who make more claims than we do and who have potential liabilities larger than ours. Why? Because we are only two people. Our children don't live with us any more. We have fewer opportunities to incur claims, but our insurance rates don't change just because we don't have as many opportunities for claims.
You may not have children, but you may have problems that cost more than children do.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I could easily get all resentful about the health insurance premiums I've paid over the years. Instead, I try to appreciate my amazing good health.
Being sick is its own punishment. Even though I scorn those who smoke, often have little sympathy with those who are obese, and can denigrate all sorts of conditions I think are preventable, I still think that those people deserve as much health care as they need. So what if others make poor decisions? We can work on getting people to make better decisions, but meanwhile let's take care of whatever ails them.
Yes, only women have babies. But not all women have babies. This is a lot like the taxes for schools issues. I can get mightily angry at those without children who complain about school taxes. First of all, I want to point out that someone else's taxes helped educate them. And no matter how many children you might have, most adults only have kids in public schools for a small portion of their tax-paying life. Having a well-educated populace benefits us all. As does having good health care benefit us all.
It's my personal opinion that we are here to take care of each other. So let's do that.
Phentex
(16,334 posts)Whether it's education or health care, transportation, security...we take care of each other. Not wanting to do this is a republican outlook.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)wtf indeed
riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)My son and husband were diagnosed with cancers 2 months apart. They were 24 and 51. Yhey had never been seriously sick. It was sudden. No warnings of ill health
We have one payer up here so we could concentrate on their healthband not worry about bills.
My son had Glioblastma Multiform brain tumour and his dad had Non Hodgkins lymphoma.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)Our PM harper would love to go the US way (before Obamacare) but he knows his party would be massacred in the next election.
No one dares to touch our health care.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The behavior of those arguing against this is totally lacking in empathy.
Conservatives mock us for our empathy. Empathy is something they don't completely get. I expect that from them. Not from fellow DUers.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)It would never in a million years have occurred to me than any liberal or Democrat would oppose something as basic as medical coverage for childbirth and birth control.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)there is an underlying tone of real ugliness to some of these WHY SHOULD I PAY FOR posts; simply put, they seem to be channeling conservatives
distantearlywarning
(4,475 posts)Why are people so mean to one another these days?
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)but I have an interest in a healthy population and propagation of the human species. How can anyone be so miserly yet claim to be a liberal?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)people create online caricatures of themselves that exacerbate such views.
valerief
(53,235 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I demand my money back.
Sophiegirl
(2,338 posts)Health insurance covers the cost of Viagra. I guess that's okay, eh?
Coexist
(24,542 posts)thats how risk pools work
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)True, but what if some day, some how, a man gets pregnant. He'll thank his lucky starts for his pre and post natal care. He will REALLY appreciate an epidural.
I could go on.....
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)tweeternik
(255 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)I pay for roads I never drive on.
I pay for libraries I don't visit.
I pay for weapons of mass destruction that I don't believe should exist.
When I go to "all you can eat" buffets, I can never eat enough to get what I've paid for.
Blah blah blah blah.... We all have bodies, and health insurance should cover whatever is necessary for health, period. When did Americans become so selfish?!
For the voice of reason.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)Hardly "liberals turning on each other", if you're talking about this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023939817
Unless I missed something?
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)I don't believe there are a lot, but there have been enough to cause a stir.
There have been several threads. I came upon this controversy last night and missed much of it myself. Here are a few.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3939817
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023940422
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023938561
IronLionZion
(45,457 posts)as a straight male I figure I may eventually have a wife and maybe a daughter or more, and I would want them to have a fair price for health insurance. Lower rates encourage more to sign up, and use it for checkups. And most of us understand the importance of preventive checkups for a person's overall well-being and lowers costs over time by catching problems early on. Women who get regular checkups are probably going to have conversations about stuff like std prevention and testing, as well as family planning and other important issues. Women who are more informed are less likely to catch an std or have unwanted pregnancy, and that lowers costs. And I would certainly want pregnant women to have access to prenatal care because that would lead to healthier children and lower costs.
The ACA makes it more affordable to have females in your life in many ways.
And of course if you don't need that much direct benefit to be convinced, you'll be happy with the old mantra that everyone benefits when EVERYONE benefits and we're only as strong as our weakest link so no one gets left behind.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Yes, through the company job we have several different options. But really, who gets to pick and choose to that extent on what they want to be insured for? Hell, to my knowledge, they still won't let you pick the cable channels you want. You have to buy a "package." Can one really say "I want this and this and this," as if from a cafe menu? I'm definitely not one of the "Me-Me-Me" people who are griping about having to pay for a service I will never need. If someone is doing that on this board, they are not a Democrat, BainsBane. they are a Republican troll. Let it go in one eye and out of the other.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)I think it's a regulation on the insurance companies in terms of what they can offer. People sure are complaining a lot. Maybe they've been watching Fox News?