General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe shale-gas boom won’t do much for climate change. But it will make us richer: Stanford Uni. Forum
Key Points :
1) The shale-gas boom will provide a modest boost to U.S. economic growth. On average, the models in the Stanford study predicted that the natural-gas boom would raise GDP by about $70 billion each year over the next several decades (in current dollars). "Although this amount appears large," the report notes, "it represents a relatively modest 0.46 percent of the U.S. economy."
2) The shale-gas boom won't do much to solve climate change at least not on its own. In recent years, a glut of natural gas has helped displace coal power in the U.S. power sector and reduce carbon-dioxide emissions significantly. After all, burning natural gas for electricity produces about half the carbon dioxide that burning coal does.
3) Natural gas will, however, help clean up other air pollutants. There's some good environmental news here. Natural gas is considerably cleaner than coal when it comes to other types of harmful air pollution, such as sulfur-dioxide and nitrogen-dioxide. These pollutants are expected to drop as shale gas becomes more plentiful.
Cleaner air, in turn, will make the country slightly richer by improving health and extending lives. "average emission damages decline by $1 billion each year (2010 dollars) for sulfur dioxide and by $0.25 billion each year for nitrogen oxides," the study notes.
4) One key variable is price: Some experts expect natural-gas prices to stay roughly flat between now and 2020, going from $4 per thousand cubic feet today to around $4.03 by the end of the decade. Others expect a sharper jump upward to $6.23 per thousand cubic feet by 2020 and even higher thereafter
Article : http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/21/the-shale-gas-boom-wont-do-much-for-climate-change-but-it-will-make-us-a-bit-richer/
Main Study Report : http://emf.stanford.edu/files/pubs/22532/Summary26.pdf
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Here's to being a petro-state!
Joel thakkar
(363 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)But, no, I'm not "happy" about anything having to do with how we extract and use energy.
Joel thakkar
(363 posts)Above that i would add 1 point :
I am trying not to be jealous but seeing how young Saudi men spend their time makes me really angry.
See this : http://www.businessinsider.com/stoning-tahjir-saudi-arabia-youth-photos-2013-9
They call it a new art trend "Stoning"....Yeah...Why would they work if they have Millions/Billions of $$$ in inheritance and here a Mcdonalds worker struggling on $8 per hour wage and counting each meal as per food stamp money.
leftstreet
(36,117 posts)and/or the products
It's more accurate to say 'they passed Russia this year...'
pscot
(21,024 posts)to your own funeral.