General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow CNN's "Both Sides Do It" Coverage of the Shutdown Failed Massively
by Dartagnan
Eric Boehlert for Media Matters takes names in ripping apart CNN's adventures in false equivalency during the shutdown and debt ceiling crisis.
How out of whack, at times, was CNN's coverage of the GOP's radical move to shut down the government and to flirt with defaulting on American's debt? So puzzling that when news broke on October 16 that a deal would be struck to avoid a catastrophic default, CNN's Ashleigh Banfield turned to her guest, Democratic Congressman James Clyburn, and blamed him for the two-week shutdown (emphasis added) :
BANFIELD: Forgive me for not popping the champagne corks, because while we're celebrating this breaking news that there's a deal, it's just a temporary deal. We're still nowhere near a solution to the crisis that the United States of America finds itself in because of people like you and your other colleagues on the Hill.
Yeah. That's a Democratic Congressman she was talking to. You remember how the House Democrats held America hostage and furloughed hundreds of thousands of workers for no reason whatsoever? Wait, you don't remember that?
Well, it gets worse.
The all-news channel began beating the blame-both-sides drum early on. From a September 23 report: "If the Democrats and Republicans don't stop bickering and agree to how the U.S. should pay its bills, the federal government will shut down, come October 1." (Emphasis added)
That drumbeat continued to the very end. The night the shutdown ended, Gloria Borger described "Congress" (not the Republican Party) as a "crisis-activated institution." Of course, Borger couldn't point to any evidence that suggested Democrats concoct one government crisis after another the way Republicans now do.
CNN often rallied around the GOP talking point that Obama ought to "negotiate" with Republicans because give-and-take is what politics (and compromise) is all about. "Why won't the president come to the negotiating table?" Candy Crowley wondered, while CNN's Carol Costello asked "Why doesn't the president pick up the phone and call John Boehner?.
Boehlert takes pains (the article described in this Diary contains links to all of the examples he cites) to point out several things that should have been obvious to CNN but which their "coverage" inexplicably declined to inform their viewers. That the shutdown was an entirely Republican-engineered enterprise in which House Democrats were relegated to the role of stunned observers; that the prolonged crisis and the sabotage inflicted on the country was pre-planned and largely the product of a civil war between factions of the Republican Party in which Congressional Democrats played no part; and most importantly, that for the President to "compromise" in order to prevent both a shutdown of the government and ultimately a default on the nation's credit would have been unprecedented in Congressional (and the nation's) history:
The why-won't-Obama-compromise storyline simply ignored the fact that Obama had already compromised regarding the budget and that at the last minute Republicans demanded that in order for them to okay the budget deal they had already agreed to, Obama needed to defund his signature legislative accomplishment of his first term, a bill that was passed into law three years ago.
Viewed in full context, the Republican demand was utterly extremist and without precedent in modern Congressional history.
But that's not how CNN presented it--instead we got more of this:
So there was an agitated Banfield demanding to know, "which one of you two parties is going to let go so that you stop tearing us apart?" (Democrats were tearing the country apart by trying to keep the government open?)
Meanwhile, CNN analyst Ana Navarro announced, "Both sides need to come to the table and they need to be rational about a real solution and do it quickly." On Crossfire, the looming question was, "Are both sides demanding too much?" And Blitzer posed the same question: "Are both sides digging in right now?"
CNN's Don Lemon, addressing a Democratic guest, said "Your party said that they won't negotiate, that they won't compromise, but that's what politics is all about, right? Why can't we find a middle ground with Republicans here?"
Meanwhile, Piers Morgan was a one-man fountain of Republican talking points:
"It's easy to say we'll blame Ted Cruz, blame the Republicans and so on," Morgan noted during the shutdown. "But it comes a point when the commander-in- chief has to take charge and try and prevent the country being damaged as best he can."
Boehlert acknowledges that not all of CNN's coverage was this grotesque, but given the fact that real consequences to real people were at issue his examples illustrate yet again the reflexive tendency of the corporate media to give the Republican Party the benefit of the doubt, even as its actions directly harm American citizens. Perhaps that's because the multimillionaire faces of "The Most Trusted Name in News" are so divorced from Americans' daily reality that they can't see a reason to point out who is at fault. One can only wonder how far the GOP needs to go--how much pain and harm they need to inflict--before this network finally places the blame where it belongs.
Apparently they haven't gone far enough yet.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/21/1249162/-How-CNN-s-Both-Sides-Do-It-Coverage-of-the-Shutdown-Failed-Massively
PPP Poll: Dems Could Win 'Sizable Majority' in House in 2014 - Pickup Opps in 49 of 61 Districts
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023893429
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023760563
Note:
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)watch TV news I get it from Bloomberg, PBS, or locals. Everything else is garbage. You only get a superficial glimpse, and more times than not led to a wrong conclusion
Whisp
(24,096 posts)I am free of CNN for a year or so now and am very very glad about it.
I think it was Cooper who I first heard say this 'both sides do it' crap.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,341 posts)about a website that is only ONE way out of multiple ways available to sign up for health insurance. All of this so that they can manufacture "news" as part of their general yellow journalism.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)It impacts the on the fence voters who, to say it politely, don't engage in any real critical thinking. Kind of the next step up from the Faux News zombies.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)It's not hard-line RW ideologues that are the problem, but the many more casual apolitical types that don't connect the dots very well; they sure are impressionable. I've found while talking to people, I can very easily tell the ones who watch cable news programs. They all say the same talking points in synchronicity even though some try to paraphrase as though they came to their conclusions via critical thought.
It's absolutely maddening to try to engage in intelligent discussion with these people who have swallowed the false equivalency bit hook, line and sinker.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)This kind of 'reporting' is doing real damage to our country. These inside the beltway pundits are married to their narrative that 'both sides are responsible' when the truth is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain.
Rex
(65,616 posts)FUCK CNN.
sheshe2
(83,850 posts)spanone
(135,858 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)CNN is just running scared!
They have been intimidated in the past by taking a neutral stance and being blasted for being a democrat site...
That's how the GOP was been setting up the field with all of the networks. They claim that all other stations are not to be trusted, that they are in the pockets of the 'elite' and democrats. And if one negative article comes out, it's used as a club to be hit with.
So, to wuss out and not be called that... they must cave to this pressure and skew their reports.
===
So, CNN is actually a cowardly organization. And they wonder why their credibility is waning.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)rather was simply an attempt to use refusal to pass a budget to delay or end a program that was not directly part of the budget talks. This is typical of our media. I wonder what these "stars" do when they are in college. Do they actually study anything other than looking good on TV? Speech classes don't teach you history or literature. The spokespeople on TV seem to have very limited educations. Maybe they should hire some people who have lived and learned a bit.
Cosmocat
(14,568 posts)when Rs were strong arming the shit out of Ds after Bush got elected, for six years until the Ds got the House/senate, the media obediently chirped the republican line "elections have consquences ... That died of course when Ds got the majority. They Rs whinned relentlessly about how PARTISAN the Ds were, but once they lose power they suddenly put a "bi" in front of what they are balling for ...
loudsue
(14,087 posts)I'm soooooo sick of the extreme right wing media!!!!
I think I will start calling it that, Extreme Right Wing Media!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Here he argues the Republicans worse mistake would be to back down on shutting down the government:
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says, according to unnamed sources quoted in Politico, that he will refuse to attend a negotiation at the White House because House Republicans have to cave and surrender to his terms, it is time to stand firm.
When a senior, unnamed Democratic official is quoted Monday morning calling for no negotiations and saying "it's time to punch the bully in the nose," it is time to stand firm.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/30/opinion/gingrich-shutdown-republicans/
Uncle Joe
(58,389 posts)Thanks for the thread, ProSense.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)I don't watch TV at home at all, and NEVER TV news but I was subjected to CNN because it was on in the dentist office waiting room and hygienist room, and also at this Italian restaurant while waiting for take-out.
The overall impression I got was just how shallow and glitzy it was all presented; rapid-fire "busy" video imagery/sounds and inane narration. Tons of repetition and leading the audience on. Seemed like the coverage of anything was more various people or parties reactions were than what it was actually being covered. Again I have to use the word shallow. It's kind of like if MTV formatted 'People' magazine for the televised media. Anybody in their right mind could see that the presentation was an insult to a cretin; yet so many tune in a swear up and down that they're "informed" as a result.
It was brutal. I need a drink. I'm having one while I unwind and share my observations right now.