Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 07:26 PM Oct 2013

'The Kentucky Kickback'-Turns Out Getting Support Of Sen McConnell Didn't Come For Free

LATEST UPDATE
6:50 pm

'The Kentucky Kickback'

Turns out getting the support of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) didn’t come for free. There’s an earmark in the Senate bill that increases the funding for the Olmsted Locks and Dam in Kentucky — a concession SenateConservatives.com has termed “The Kentucky Kickback.”

On first glance, the earmark language looks inoffensive enough:

SEC. 123. Section 3(a)(6) of Public Law 100–676 is amended by striking both occurrences of ‘‘$775,000,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof, ‘‘$2,918,000,000’’


But when you dig just a little bit deeper, it turns out that Public Law 100–676 is a provision in the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 that funds Olmsted, and that this new provision would increase the cap on construction spending there by $1.2 billion, giving relief to what’s become a cash-strapped project.

All signs indicate that this was a private concession made to McConnell to get him on board with the bill.


The Final Bill
SHARE For anyone interested in looking over all the details, here is the final text of the bill that the Senate and House are expected to pass tonight.

MORE:
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/10/15/2779001/debt-ceiling-shutdown-liveblog/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'The Kentucky Kickback'-T...