General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI don't like blue dogs any more than most of you, but,
if ever there were a time to put forward conservative Dems in the right wing gerrymandered districts, it is right now. A House majority is a real possibility after tea crazies threw their hissyfit, and saner Rethugs failed to spank them. Certainly there are many districts with Rethug moderate congress critters that are in our grasp, but why not go for the more difficult ones also?
cali
(114,904 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)What positions does he hold that are to the left of the "blue dogs"?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)you are a wee bit confused. do you want to see liberals elected? anywhere?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)expanded access to health care, pro-choice, supports Affirmative Action, fair pay for women, and supports immigration reform. That list of stances right there is already to the left of many Blue Dogs.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)leftstreet
(36,108 posts)Then it's a total victory!!!
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)leftstreet
(36,108 posts)Or maybe they'll just start calling themselves Tea Dogs
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Nancy Pelosi, unlike Orange Man, knows how to get her House in order.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)stranger81
(2,345 posts)No thank you . . . .
Chan790
(20,176 posts)On The Issues is one of my favorite sites, it keeps politicians from being able to run away from their records and previous stances.
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)That's how this works...
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)DireStrike
(6,452 posts)It is disempowering when you have to explain to people why a Democratic majority can't get anything done. At least republicans are an enemy you can fight against. This blue dog shit splits the party and makes ALL Democrats look incompetent.
How much worse it is depends on how often they actually vote with the fucking caucus that supported them and got them elected.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Being in the majority is ALWAYS best.
DireStrike
(6,452 posts)If we had 49 democrats and 3 moderate republicans who vote with the dems 60% of the time, it is better than 52 democrats with 3 blue dogs who vote with dems 40% of the time.
The majority only counts if it votes as a block.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)I'd rather have 535 Feinsteins than even 1 libertarian.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Not with your second, however.
BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)That was a very, very bad screw up on my part.
I'm glad someone said something or I would have never noticed it.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I like your first one better now, though!
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)roughly 70% of the time, at the worst. But you'll be lucky to even find any 'Baggers or other Republicans who will cooperate these days.
Another thing to add is that while I myself am also not a fan of Blue Dogs, I recognize that it's virtually impossible to win with a bleeding- heart liberal candidate in a state like Utah or Idaho. In any Blue state, you can certainly have all the left-wing candidates you want, but that won't fly in any Red states unfortunately.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)A lot of times excuses are posted for representatives who can vote left but choose not to do so. If the rep in question is in a situation analogous to Mike McIntyre, then he's probably got to vote right because he's hanging onto his seat by his fingernails. If it's a district that leans right, but the particular rep wins with a decent margin, then it's a lot less forgivable.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Well, who won those seats? Republicans, that's who.
Great strategy, skippy.............