Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

lame54

(35,292 posts) Wed Oct 16, 2013, 02:53 PM Oct 2013

The Teabaggers Dirty Little Secret

A Couple of weeks ago Bill Maher Suggested that it will be the teabaggers dirty little secret that they will sign up for The ACA and like it
I agree

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Teabaggers Dirty Little Secret (Original Post) lame54 Oct 2013 OP

Polling showed that if you call it "ACA" instead of "Obamacare" support increases. phantom power Oct 2013 #1

"This beats Obamacare I hope" IronLionZion Oct 2013 #3

I suspect that was the entire point of trying to stop the ACA before January. arcane1 Oct 2013 #2

phantom power

(25,966 posts)

1. Polling showed that if you call it "ACA" instead of "Obamacare" support increases.

Reply to lame54 (Original post)

Wed Oct 16, 2013, 03:11 PM

Oct 2013

People also like it better when it's called by the local state name, depending on state. I wish I could find the article. "I sure like <my state's implementation of ACA> better than that Obamacare"

IronLionZion

(45,447 posts)

3. "This beats Obamacare I hope"

Reply to phantom power (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 17, 2013, 12:14 PM

Oct 2013

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/03/1243855/-Kentucky-s-success-makes-a-mockery-of-GOP-Obamacare-foes

arcane1

(38,613 posts)

2. I suspect that was the entire point of trying to stop the ACA before January.

Reply to lame54 (Original post)

Wed Oct 16, 2013, 03:13 PM

Oct 2013

Come November, many of these voters will have been enjoying insurance for 11 months, and won't take too kindly to the politician who tried to deny their access to it.

Reply to this discussion