Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are they waiting until after dinner to vote? (Original Post) apples and oranges Oct 2013 OP
Because the cook at the congressional messhall Swede Atlanta Oct 2013 #1
+1 Roland99 Oct 2013 #13
Pigs like to eat first jsr Oct 2013 #2
Whom? House or Senate. Mass Oct 2013 #3
The Senate is taking it up first. HappyMe Oct 2013 #8
They want to make sure they are good and drunk. B Calm Oct 2013 #4
Maybe to run out the clock on the House... Tom Rinaldo Oct 2013 #5
Red meat to the witless Warpy Oct 2013 #6
They can't do anythign without the drama. SamYeager Oct 2013 #7
Senate hasn't even begun to consider voting. robinlynne Oct 2013 #10
They are too busy having a party about just how wonderful they all are. robinlynne Oct 2013 #9
Reminds me of the Oscars. Glorification to our group..Ugh...n/t monmouth3 Oct 2013 #11
Don't they watch horror movies? apples and oranges Oct 2013 #12
The Senators all have to finish praising themselves over the great job that they did. PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #14
They still have to congratulate themselves for a few more hours. Buns_of_Fire Oct 2013 #15
In part because it will take some time to actually put the deal into legislative language onenote Oct 2013 #16
And another review to be sure no one slipped anything in there. hootinholler Oct 2013 #17
Yes, I suspect they haven't finished writing yet. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #18
After the local evening news dump or maybe Boner is still short of the votes. CK_John Oct 2013 #19
Boehner only needs 17 votes, he's likely working on cooling tempers over there PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #20
Because the 17th has always been an arbitrary date. A couple of hours won't matter now. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #21
(First) Whipping votes. (Second) They hope to have a smaller audience after evening news. ieoeja Oct 2013 #22
 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
1. Because the cook at the congressional messhall
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:30 PM
Oct 2013

needs some time to cook up a mess of 'crow' for the pukes while the democrats dine on steak and lobster!!!

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
5. Maybe to run out the clock on the House...
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:36 PM
Oct 2013

...to make it impossible for the House to make a revision to the Senate Bill and still return it in time for the Senate to be the ones who have no time left to do anything other than accept the revision or have the nation go into default.

Warpy

(111,264 posts)
6. Red meat to the witless
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:37 PM
Oct 2013

My guess is that they won't pass it until late tonight.

First they'll send one with a lot of poison pill riders that Obama will veto.

Eventually they'll get around to sending one he'll sign.

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
12. Don't they watch horror movies?
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:46 PM
Oct 2013

Don't relax until the monster is completely incapacitated! I don't trust the teabaggers and we shouldn't give them hours and hours to change their minds.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
14. The Senators all have to finish praising themselves over the great job that they did.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:54 PM
Oct 2013

That along with lots of hand wringing can take some time.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,180 posts)
15. They still have to congratulate themselves for a few more hours.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:57 PM
Oct 2013

...for doing their damned JOBS that they're getting overpaid for.

onenote

(42,703 posts)
16. In part because it will take some time to actually put the deal into legislative language
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 01:58 PM
Oct 2013

Typically legislative negotiations are not conducted by exchanging formal legislative language; rather it ususally involves exchanging descriptions of the proposed results. Turning those results into legislative language and having it reviewed carefully by leadership (or more precisely leadership's senior staff) will take several hours.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
20. Boehner only needs 17 votes, he's likely working on cooling tempers over there
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 02:32 PM
Oct 2013

so he isn't challenged as speaker. But as DUer onenote pointed out in this thread it does take some time to
put an agreement into actual bill form and that is probably what is going on behind the scenes right now.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
22. (First) Whipping votes. (Second) They hope to have a smaller audience after evening news.
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 03:17 PM
Oct 2013

They'd rather their surrender be unwatched. And this maximizes the time they have to poll the Teabagger rank and file and prepare their talking points.

Had they voted on this morning, they'd have been facing the press all day. After dinner they will have "gone home for the night".

Better yet, their office may get to respond, "Congress is in recess. The Congressman will be available for comments after the recess." The Sunday morning talkers will have til then to get their talking points in place. And the Sunday afternoon polls will let them adjust those points for the remainder of House Republicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are they waiting unti...