General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStudent Commits Suicide In High School With Item That Gun Culture Placed Within Reach
A 17-year-old Texas student committed suicide in a high school courtyard on Tuesday, according to multiple media reports.
Austin police confirmed the boy shot himself at Lanier High School some time before 1:30 p.m. local time, KVUE reported.
Meria Carstarphen, superintendent of the Austin Independent School District tweeted, "We are saddened by this tragic loss. Our thoughts are with the family."
School officials told the Statesman the incident took place shortly after noon.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/15/student-commits-suicide-texas_n_4101906.html
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)"With Item That Gun Culture Placed Within Reach"
We just don't have enough gun fatalities in this country...
fitman
(482 posts)n/t
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)However, I agree that the particular implement used isn't even close to the primary issue needed to be addresses here.
kcr
(15,317 posts)The big giant one that will cover the entire country with its magical no more depression and mental illness dust!!! *Waaaave*
There! No more mental illness! Now we can have alll the guns we want!
Seriously. Some people need to get with it and live in reality.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)That portrays an infant in a highchair, unable to reach the sharp knives on the table. This teenager needed more help than inability to procure a firearm.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)that's in the news, a girl jumped off a tower.
Maybe we should look at the problems that would cause young people to want to kill themselves, rather than using these tragedies as political tools.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Getting to the bottom of what the hell is going on here will help the kids. That should be the issue here.
kcr
(15,317 posts)Having access to a gun can make a difference.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Issues that are much larger factors and are likely to have a greater impact.
kcr
(15,317 posts)Those who want guns and easy access to them want to explain away all the unfortunate incidents, therefore, debatable. Yeah, he could have committed suicide some other way. So yeah, that justifies the easy access to guns, see? Easy, peasy logic. I'll just forget the guy I knew in highschool who tried to hang himself, and when his parents found him they were able to rescue him. But had they had a gun I'm sure the results would have been far different and he'd likely not be alive today. But, debatable, right? Access to guns is what's important.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)I'm sure you think yourself oh so very clever.peace
kcr
(15,317 posts)Let's continue to push the guns guns guns, guns in every house! Because self defense! That would have helped my classmate way back when. His parents might have been more likely to have a gun had it been today instead of back then. That would have helped him so much. Guns are the way.
Using this kid's death to make a point is bullshit.
Teen suicide is becoming a huge problem, but please proceed with deflecting that issue.
I should also note here that I don't have a gun and am not going to buy one.
kcr
(15,317 posts)If even one parent thinks twice about having a gun in the house, it's worth it. When a kid gets a hold of a gun and kills himself it's not just a suicide. It's a gun death. Hello.
TEEN SUICIDE!
Your lack of concern about that issue is disgusting.
Your lack of concern about gun deaths!
Look, we could go back and forth with this ridiculous I CARE MORE ABOUT THIS THAN YOU!! bullshit but let's not. Just stop. If concern about gun deaths aren't your thing, fine. That's cool.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)concerned about gun deaths. But I am more concerned with WHY kids are killing themselves, rather than getting into a twist only when it involves a gun.
But how ridiculous is it to accuse someone of not caring that someone died because they care they died because of a gun. That's just mind bogglingly I-don't-know-what. Do you think gun advocates don't care about any of the gun victims?
pintobean
(18,101 posts)but I think the messy method and public place of this tragedy indicates that the guy was sending a message. I doubt that message was about gun control or being a statistic for your argument. Yes, I think you care, but it also appears that you're using him.
I think we should look for the message he was sending. Understanding the reasons, and addressing those reasons, will save lives. Making it just another gun death is just math.
kcr
(15,317 posts)I think the same could be said for any violent gun death incident. Why is so horrible to point out that gun availability is a factor in this death, but not for any of the mass shootings? The answer is it's not. And I don't understand why it makes people so uncomfortable. A person who has committed suicide by gun is a gun victim as well.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Happy?
kcr
(15,317 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)You insulted two people because I gave you what you wanted.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)they're a victim of their inner demons that drove them to commit suicide by whatever method used.
The solution, it seems, is to intervene before the person gets to this point in their life.
kcr
(15,317 posts)How is it different when the "demons" means they shoot others? vs the "demons" means they shoot themselves? Someone is dead by a gun either way. I think it's especially important that people keep that second kind of "demon" in mind when they buy a gun. You think it can't happen to you or someone you love. And then it does. I think it's especially important to drive this home. Sometimes you don't see it coming. And fight the NRA's Gotta Have a Gun For Self Defense meme.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)I have no problem with people who are not disallowed from buying firearms for self protection, after all, we do have an inherent right to self protection no matter what instrument is used, IE: firearm, baseball bat, knife, really smelly fart.
kcr
(15,317 posts)I just hate the NRA's stranglehold on our legislature that has led to deregulation of guns nad the easy access to them. I'm for regulation of guns. I'm also against the heavy marketing of guns. And no, I don't believe the average american needs a gun for self defense. And if it weren't for the years of heavy marekting of guns mixed with right wing media, I don't think our country would be as saturated with them.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)if that's the way it came across, then I apologize.
Maybe the average american doesn't need a gun for self defense, but that's up to the average american to make that determination.
As far as the heavy marketing, that's debatable, I rarely see any advertising on TV, or most magazines, and unless you belong to a pro gun org. then the marketing is really very negligible.
Anyway, I'm really not that interested in this issue of guns, I probably should have just STFU and gone about my merry way.
I do hunt and do carry a gun in the course of my profession.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I don't think that examining the mechanisms denies one the ability to also examine the cause-- neither being a distraction, yet both being an issue...
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Do we want to be like Britain that are SO paranoid about guns that even picking up a cartridge you found in your garden (that you don't even own a gun for) gets you in trouble? Or where you can't even carry a decent pocket knife (an extremely useful only a daily basis)?
The problem with blaming THINGS is that you always have to move on to the next thing. We need to address cultural issues driving this stuff. We need to treat the disease, not the symptoms.
kcr
(15,317 posts)One of them being the Got to Have Guns for Self Defense" being crammed down our throats. The fear culture that makes us think we're in far more danger than we are that makes us more vulnerable to those selling us those guns. Because you're never going to to get rid of sadness and depression and mental illness. It's never going to go away. You aren't going to make everyone happy so that we can have unlimited guns. No, you can't ban everything. But that doesn't mean you have to be lawless. We don't have to be like Britain. But that dioesn't mean we have to be Libertarian Land. That's ridiculous.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)What is it you propose? banning private gun ownership? That simply will not happen. Again, that's attacking the wrong end of the problem.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)just the debatable heavy marketing of guns for self defense.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I mean, a lot of people who own guns own them because they want them as a last ditch means of defense. I hate feeling powerless, and I avoid it whenever I can. For me, that means having a firearm available for defense, if necessary.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Goodbye.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)If that pisses you off and you can't handle, I rather you DIDN'T read my posts.
I notice you didn't actually have any kind of argument in there either.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Ok...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)It is tragic that he chose a permenant solution to a temporary problem. Teens haven't lived enough of life to know that the horrible problem that they face can be lived through.
People have been killing themselves forever. Suicides didn't start happening with the invention of guns. Japan has a far higher suicide rate than our and they have no guns. A person who wants to kill themselves can have an easy time finding a way.
Response to GreenStormCloud (Reply #7)
Paladin This message was self-deleted by its author.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)At Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:35 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
No, but you'd derive satisfaction from the use of another method. (nt)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3861052
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
What. The. Fuck?
This post is 100% over-the-top, disgusting, and disruptive.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:42 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: That really is insensitive. I don't really like the post it is in response to, but no need of accusing the person of relishing another's death.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Pretty rude.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Not worthy of an alert. If the one that alerted wants more civility on the internets, they could start by not using profanity.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I don't hide posts from people reacting to gun nuts and pro-gun apologia. I don't believe pro-gun OPs or comments belong in GD.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)that a juror is more offended by the alerter using the word fuck, than by one DUer trying to dehumanize another simply for having a different pov.
#6 is a real peach, too.
prefunk
(157 posts)How some can sink so low...
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)fucking sick thing to say.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Paladin
(28,262 posts)You're welcome.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)But glad you have the integrity to remove it.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)Have a great day.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Firearms are among the more successful means of committing suicide, lots of other means have far lower "success" rates at suicide.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)The argument culd be made that those who use a gun really want to do it, while those who use less successful methods are wanting to only make an "attempt".
That is not to downplay attempts. They are desperate cries for help and should be treated seriously.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)RIGHT FUCKING NOW!
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Aristus
(66,381 posts)high school courtyards.
The NRA will no doubt insist...
ileus
(15,396 posts)Another misused firearm.