Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 10:12 AM Oct 2013

The national debt would have been larger under McCain or Romney than under Obama.

This is shocking news that Tea Partiers do not want to hear because most of them voted for Romney. But it is something they need to hear.

Because, Romney was not only going to extend all the Bush taxcuts but wanted another $5 trillion in tax cuts. It is an illusion to think those taxcuts would have created jobs. They would only add to the deficit and debt.

Also, Romney and McCain agreed with the TARP bailout which caused the first deficit of 2009 to be $1.2 trillion dollars. There is absolutely no way that anyone could go from $1.2 trillion dollar deficit to a balanced budget in one year, especially during the deepest recession since the Great Depression. The unemployment rate would have been higher under McCain and Romney and would have added even more to our debt and deficit than it did under Obama because they would not have bailed out the auto industry and they would not have supported any stimulus spending to improve the economy.

If Romney or McCain had been elected, with Tea Party support, our debt would be approaching $20 trillion dollars today and the economy would be in even worse shape than it is right now, simply because we were in such an economic mess in 2009.

On top of all that, we would most likely still be in Iraq and Afghanistan with plans to invade Iran or Syria.

So the Tea Party is basing its entire reason for existence on an illusion about the debt and deficit. They are living a lie. They blame the huge debt on Barack Obama, when they voted for the huge debt and deficits under George W Bush, and when McCain or Romney would have done a much worse job at stopping that runaway train.





6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The national debt would have been larger under McCain or Romney than under Obama. (Original Post) kentuck Oct 2013 OP
We would also be at war with Iran Drale Oct 2013 #1
I think this is an important point to make to Tea Partiers. kentuck Oct 2013 #2
Republicans in my office are stunned to learn that the deficit has been going down. tridim Oct 2013 #3
And this is the issue that is driving the Tea Party... kentuck Oct 2013 #4
I'm sure they would have raised the ceiling no problem. klyon Oct 2013 #5
so that'd be a total of 5-7 off-the-books wars! yow! MisterP Oct 2013 #6

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
2. I think this is an important point to make to Tea Partiers.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 10:19 AM
Oct 2013

The debt would have been much larger under Republicans.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
3. Republicans in my office are stunned to learn that the deficit has been going down.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 10:19 AM
Oct 2013

So stunned in fact that they don't believe it at all.

They also conveniently forget that the previous Democratic admin had a balanced budget and that all modern Republican Admins have exploded the deficit.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
4. And this is the issue that is driving the Tea Party...
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 11:08 AM
Oct 2013

and it is all based on false assumptions.

klyon

(1,697 posts)
5. I'm sure they would have raised the ceiling no problem.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 11:42 AM
Oct 2013

And we would be in two more wars, off the books of course.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The national debt would h...