General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans are going to win the shutdown on policy. Guaranteed.
What Democrats are giving up/likely to give up:
1. Use Republicans' spending levels on budget level for c.r.
2. Repeal Obamacare medical device tax
3. Unduly burdensome income verification for Obamacare subsidies
What Republicans are going to give up:
Not a goddamn thing.
The reason they do this is that it always, always, always works. It worked again.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Please share - I thought I was paying attention...?
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)because that's a pretty big statement to 'guarantee' from thin air.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)No, of course not; you will just find another way to denigrate the President
lamp_shade
(14,841 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)That the President and Reid and Pelosi and others on our side will declare it a victory and any of us who don't agree will be accused of wanting a Cruz/Paul presidency.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)What's your basis for this agenda of yours?
Atman
(31,464 posts)While the Dem's track record has not been good, their hand has never been this strong. You post this "concern" just as every poll and most pundits are saying just the opposite, to the point of Democrats even pushing back, making their own demands.
So why post this crapola now? What's your point? Just hoping to kill the momentum?
yuiyoshida
(41,835 posts)Not. AT. All.
Broward
(1,976 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)It's kind of like that 'glass houses' thing...
leftstreet
(36,110 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)But what will happen is that there will be a "temporary" agreement to reopen the government and raise the debt limit for a few weeks while a new budget is "negotiated" by the "moderates" in both parties. IOW, the neo-liberal Dems and Reps. The "temporary" agreement will use Republican spending levels for the CR. It will "delay" the medical device tax and the subsidies decision until the real "negotiations" take place.
Then there will be a "Sequester II" negotiated which will allow the Austerians to cut spending even further than the original sequester on everything, EXCEPT the DoD WITHOUT TAKING A VOTE ON IT. We will be assured that this will be such a "Doomsday" scenario that it will NEVER come to pass because it would be so draconian. Then, a few weeks previous to it kicking in, there will be budget proposals floated that lock in Sequester I funding for domestic programs and it will be sold as the "compromise" position and the BEST case scenario will be locking in the current sequester levels forever. Worst case will be a "compromise" somewhere BETWEEN the current sequester and Sequester II.
If I'm wrong I'll come back and say so. But I really doubt that I'm wrong on this. It's the pattern that has developed around this issue.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)It's just not cool to muck with the full faith and credit of the United States.
-Laelth
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)will allow them to 'save face' that means paying them a small policy ransom instead of a big one.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)But right now, we have them over a barrel, and they know it. They will give us a lot (and I mean much more than just raising the debt ceiling), and we'll give them a little something to save face. That's how I see this playing out.
Of course, I could be wrong. We'll see.
-Laelth
rock
(13,218 posts)and will veto any bill that does not give him what he has been asking for all along?