General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHalf The Vehicles In Driveways Huge Gas Guzzling Polluting Trucks.
On our campaign walks today I noticed that at most homes half the vehicles were big gas guzzling pick up trucks. We are toast when it comes to global warming. So many people are in defiance and are determined to put as much CO2 in the air as possible. And what was noticeable is how many of these trucks were super trucks. I doubt very many were work trucks. They were general transportation trucks.
JI7
(89,260 posts)at least in california it seems like the SUV thing is not as popular as a few years back. i'm noticing more eco friendly cars these days.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)The area we were campaigning has higher level homes probably over $300,000 to $450,000. You see a lot of bigger trucks in Denver. And there are a lot of super large trucks that are 3 feet off the ground. A lot of them are middle and younger white crackers who would not be caught dead with a Dem.
We have a lot of gun nuts out here. They believe they want to have big guns so they will be ready to overthrow the government. That's what they really think. As I said in an earlier threat. The NRA is sponsoring recalls. They won two and three others are supposedly being planned.
The two we lost only about 13% of the registered voters voted for it. The GOP suppressed the vote and sent out the nuts.
Americans must realize that the NRA supports carry any weapon of your choice anywhere you want including churches, bars, public places, government buildings etc.
JI7
(89,260 posts)areas.
seems like wealthy wingnuts tend to like huge vehicles.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)He works with weather data at CU. He was telling me that global warming is a total certainty. We have to act now to reduce emissions to keep global warming to a certain level. If we don't it could get too hot to exist.
scores of hybrids, Prius mostly, and scores of Range Rovers here in Pasadena. I wish the huge SUV kick would die...
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)Are you in favor of govt. regs. requiring what type of vehicles people can own?
JI7
(89,260 posts)Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)because it meets all the govt standards?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)But we need to do more, as the consumers themselves illustrate.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)your in favor of the govt. telling you what vehicles you can or cannot own?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)But, good effort. Keep trying.
Ranchemp.
(1,991 posts)Ron Green
(9,823 posts)The free market doesn't always work very well to help people do the right thing, especially when they're angry or fearful.
Sometimes education is needed, and sometimes it takes laws and regulations.
kydo
(2,679 posts)and all the other hate programing that passes for the right wing mega noise machine. After you have been in the real world for 90 days then we can talk.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)2/10
Mariana
(14,860 posts)However, the government can, and does, tell you what vehicles you can and cannot drive on the public roads. Here's an example: I've got to take one of my vehicles in for inspection this month. If it fails, I still own it, but I can't drive it until the problem is fixed, because the government said so. It's the law, you see.
For the record, I have a big pickup with a V8 engine. I don't drive it all that much - I bought it new, and now it's 14 years old and has about 76,000 miles on it. If I had to commute any kind of distance, I'd get something more appropriate.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)There is a long list of regulations a vehicle has to pass in order to be legal on US roads, everything from lighting standards to bumper height to emissions.
Just try to buy one of those ultra high mpg small diesel pickups that are popular in much of the rest of the world for instance.
oldhippie
(3,249 posts)The government prohibits the import or manufacture of vehicles they don't want you to own. You can only buy the ones they approve.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Which is what they already do in Europe.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)Not in the form of prohibition...but I think Italy has the right idea by classifying anything weighing more than 1T or having more than 2 axles as a work vehicle subject to additional taxes, which can substantial. We already do this with larger vehicles...I'm proposing we move the bar down.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Did you notice any correlation between vehicle type and politics on your canvass?
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)of their neighbors who have big trucks. This couple has a Prius and another high mileage car. There definitely is an attitude. These jerks drive aggressively, tail gate, pass around you, et al. Complete assholes most of the time.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)whenever they're out driving their big-ass trucks. They're angry all the time they're on the road, and they take it out on anyone they perceive as likely to be a liberal.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Tax breaks could be had for buying Hummers. Light trucks and SUVs were exempt from mileage standards.
Station wagons disappeared, and people felt like they had to have a truck to be popular, macho, and safe.
Eventually more and more people driving regular sized reasonable efficient cars gave them up for higher riding heavier trucks.
And here we are.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)It has a smaller motor than the Ranger I was driving, but gets better mileage. Ain't technology wonderful!
With the crew cab I can pick up my help and save them the gas to get to the jobsite.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)It just seems as though some trucks are just way over the top. And I rally have a problem with the ones that take 1 1/2 spaces or they stick so far out they almost block the lane.
Thankfully the mileage is much better than it used to be. A lot of them are in the 20+ range now.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Ron Green
(9,823 posts)of these monsters in a driveway (working class neighborhood), and when I knocked on the door there was nobody home!! They were gone in yet another vehicle.
During that campaign I was interviewed by a panel from the Chamber of Commerce. Of course I didn't expect their endorsement, but I wanted to exchange some ideas with them. One of their questions was about the cost of energy, and I immediately began by pointing out that conservation is by far the quickest and best way to bring down prices. I asked them to imagine a big pickup truck available for use throughout a neighborhood, but jointly purchased and maintained, rather than every household having to make huge payments on it. I went on to cite some other examples of cooperative economics, and encouraged them to think about a more sustainable and local economy.
A couple of days later, my campaign manager pulled me aside and said, "Did you tell those people over at the Chamber of Commerce you want to take away their trucks?"
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)that it's not what we think we're saying, but what "they" think they're hearing. People hear what they want to hear.
You've seen it even here on DU, where someone takes a comment the wrong way and the fight starts. Imagine what it's like when you're not on the same side to begin with.
My Chevy Cruze gets 35-40 mpg and I am both jealous of Prius owners who get better and pissed at truck and SUV owners who get half that when they crank up a pickup to pick up a pizza. But, I just don't talk about it. Ever. I'm trying to get votes, and pissing off voters, even inadvertently, doesn't help.
We all have our own set of sacred and inviolable rights and any time you bring up these rights we will automatically be on the defensive and it's shields up-- we hear through our own set of filters.
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)when talking to voters. But for chrissakes, when we can't expect public policy people and would-be campaign endorsers to understand these concepts without getting their ideological panties in a knot, then we know our system is screwed.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)our only vehicle, paid for and very well maintained. We drive it about 9,000 miles a year, if that. Not trading it in for a new car payment, sorry.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)I use it only on occasions when I am hauling cargo or a trailer. It gets really poor gas mileage but suppose I bought a new pickup that got 5 or so better mpg what is the carbon footprint of that new pickup truck when it comes off the assembly line?
I've never seen figures on that, but I bet that I can drive old Thirsty a few more miles on the amount of carbon a new vehicle created in its production plus what it emits when driven.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Who would have guessed?
I think people buy what they need. We have no way of knowing how those vehicles are used. The fact that they're sitting in driveways on a Sunday afternoon, in the fall, tells us nothing.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example, I need to haul crap regularly.
My options are 1) A truck, or 2) A combination of vehicle and trailer that costs more and gets worse mileage.
I'm going to need a new one shortly - the old one's dying. I'd like to buy a small one, but the car makers appear to have decided nobody wants small pickups anymore. For example, If you go to Ford's website, they appear to not make the Ranger anymore, only the F-150 and up.
Can't buy a vehicle that isn't being made.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)in store parking lots.
One day when Mr Pipi was out shopping in the city with our Jeep Grand Cherokee (since gone) a guy came up to him and started ranting about all kinds of shit related to owning a big SUV, blah blah blah.
The only problem was, he assumed that we are city dwellers. We're not. We are rural and have to drive to the city for anything of importance.
I'm just waiting for the day when some fruitcake Uber-Liberal gets pissed off and keys our Hummer H3 or flattens the tires thinking we're city dwellers ruining the world with our selfishness.
I feel safe in the Hummer. Since we don't go anywhere without consolidating trips, it's big enough to hold all the stuff we pick up while we're out. And average driving with it is about 25 miles per week, if that.
Older Dodge Ram 2500 is almost exclusively a plow truck except for weekly/bi-weekly trips to the dump. Ten miles per week.
People don't even stop to think that maybe the big-ass vehicle in the driveway or parking lot might not be what they think it is.
Tikki
(14,559 posts)are HYBRIDS.
Must be where you live as a factor.
Tikki
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)you will be able to pick one up very cheap.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)Ultimately these trucks are ok and I am sure they could be brought up to 30MPH. We have just about doubled the mileage at this point. My hybrid electric is fast enough and I am sure that these trucks could be made to include a mode that would give them the torque power they need which is only occasionally.
Kaleva
(36,325 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)We don't use it all the time but there are times where we need a pickup truck and times where we need 4WD here in Michigan, and so we have that.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)... is immaterial to your issue. Unlike the car you drove to get to the Denver campaign walkabout, the trucks in the driveways aren't contributing CO2 at all.
While I'm driving to work in my Subaru Loyale, my "gas guzzling 4x4 v8 pickup" is sitting idle in my driveway too, waiting for people like you to ask me to help them move.
I'm no more concerned with your judgment of me based on the car in my driveway than I am someone's judgment of me based on the clothes that hang in my closet.
But I think I'll drive the truck to work today, because the battery goes dead if I don't drive it periodically.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)As soon as the economy gets better, the price of crude oil goes up and consumption goes down.
China just passed the US as the biggest importer of crude. Global competition will keep prices high and consumption down.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)domestic manufacturing and union wages.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2013, 12:33 PM - Edit history (1)
It might be that some of them have to deal with brutal snowstorms and a lack of traction during the winter. Or shit, some might work contracting or construction jobs and need it for that. Generalizations and assuming everyone is just stupid without understanding their situations really makes the world suck and harms progressivism more than it helps.
I used to own a Ram for almost that very reason. Not everyone who drives a truck does so because they hate the environment.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)It isn't just 4x4s that pump out the carbon. It is ALL passenger vehicles, hybrids and electric cars (which are actually coal powered).
The biggest contributor to global warming is agriculture so all in all we have a lot of changes to make if we want to have any hope of reversing the increase in temps and hurricanes and the radicalization of the jet stream.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)"Climate change" is misleading and a lie really. Global warming models include cold and snow. Just because we have cold snaps and snow events does not mean there is no warming. It is the cumulative effect of warming over time. The coldest cold events are less frigid over time and ice sheets still melt more in warm periods. Ice still developes but it is thinner and slightly less in area until it ceases to form or disappears.
The climate could shift into warm with much less cooling and it can be dramatic. Climatologists do have ancient history and ice corp samples that indicate quick drastic shifts.
Someone I know who is a climate researcher has told me that global warming is here and it is only a matter of how dramatic it will be. If we do not start some serious work on this issue we could be toast. A certain level of temp rise if already built in.
Trucks to me reveal an attitude about this problem and fewer trucks and vehicle are not the solution. A broad based move to energy efficiency, renewable energy and conservation are the better solutions.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)that gets used for 120 miles a day versus a 4x4 that gets 16MPG and gets used twice a month shows how bad our choices are.
We are, as consumers of vehicles, somewhat powerless to make real change because the range of choices is narrow and ALL are carbon-adding. Better options would be walk-able cities, work-from-home, bicycles and telecommuting.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Yeah, sure, that's exactly what they were thinking when they spent ten to twenty thousand dollars.
You seriously, genuinely need to get help.
JCMach1
(27,566 posts)It's a sad fact, but many of those trucks get nearly the same mileage as your larger cars (or better sometimes)...
Throd
(7,208 posts)Do we get to judge people who own those too?
Let's work on turning them all hybrid and electric...
How about taking all the oil company welfare and turning it into tax credits for those who want electric and hybrid vehicles... cut the prices by 1/4 or 1/3 and see how more quickly they would sell.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)My Dakota is lucky to get 18MPG
You know much about automobiles?
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)There probably is not that a person can do except around the edges that could produce a mile or two in MPG. Basic engineering of a vehicle pretty much determined how much mileage it will get.
Peregrine Took
(7,416 posts)If you are in a normal sized sedan you can't see around them or through their windows to see what's ahead and just forget trying to turn left behind one, also, turning left as you can't even get a peek at the oncoming traffic.
Polluting monster fuglies.
In my area the hot one is the BMW great big thing (has to be black or silver) which goes from the high rise garage to Whole Foods and back.
penultimate
(1,110 posts)I've been noticing some newer trucks get better gas mileage than my small car. Also, some people have legit needs for a larger truck. I don't put pickup owners in the same category as Hummers, because there is a practical usage for pickups.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)Trucks have improved in gas mileage a lot compared to what they used to be.
JustAnotherGen
(31,849 posts)My husband owns and drives a 2001 Yukon . . . General Transporation. But he hauls copper, iron, steel, etc. etc. in it. It's his livelihood- and for a small load - it makes no sense to get whacked with the insane delivery charge of a CDL driven truck - when he can run and get it himself.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)That fact is understandable. Getting them to the highest gas mileage possible should be our goal.
JustAnotherGen
(31,849 posts)My husband also has a 1960 Volvo sports car that we get around in Italy in. The mileage on that is ridiculous!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Let's look at the options:
1) SUV - worse milage, costs more.
2) Small car - no 4WD, which can be quite an issue in Denver. Especially since they don't do the "salt the hell out of the roads" stupidity they do in the Northeast.
3) 4WD truck.
Yeah, these people are terrible for choosing option 3.
madokie
(51,076 posts)maybe that is the case with many of these.
Sometimes we need a big ass truck and for those times we use ours. otherwise we drive a 30 + mpg 2014 ford focus hatchback
Throd
(7,208 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Nothing takes the place of a big truck when needed.
I realize there are way too many being used as daily drivers where there is no need but some of us have to have one from time to time.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I'm no fan of folks buying more vehicle than they need. However, it is not up to me or you as a matter of fact, in getting to decide what folks can buy.
In CO, according to NADA data more than 1/2 of all vehicles sold in your state are light trucks and SUVs. But there are a lot of factors to keep in mind.
#1. As you know it snows in CO. Quite a bit in my opinion. A 4WD/AWD vehicle is the best for those driving conditions.
#2. Colorado has a high percent of folks employed in in industries that may require a heavier duty vehicle compared to a passenger car. (BLS data)
#3. Colorado has on average (when compared to the rest of the US) a higher wage for these occupations. (BLS data)
From the BLS data, I figure that there are about 400,000 folks employed in fields where a truck or SUV may be the prudent choice when selecting a vehicle. However there are many other occupations where a vehicle that is designed for driving in adverse conditions may also be the prudent choice. I'd rather have my Emergency Room doctor show up to work on time in their Light Duty pickup truck, than stuck in the snow in their passenger vehicle.
Also, not all job descriptions can accurately tell us if a heavier duty vehicle would be a requirement of the job. I'm a nerd. I have a nerd job. I work with computers for a living in the IT field. Most would look at my job description and state that I do not need a truck. However, in fact I do. My job takes me to new construction sites on a regular basis. I would be unable to enter the majority of these sites with a passenger vehicle. Plus with all of the equipment that I am required to bring, there would not be enough room for my tools and supplies.
eilen
(4,950 posts)They always seem to park in the middle where the compact cars are supposed to be-- so they jut out and then tend to take up more spots because the spots are smaller so another car cannot fit between them (and allow room for the driver to get out). These are alway backer-inners too so they park crooked as well. I say, if you can't back out well enough, you shouldn't park there.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)QED
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)He who lives wins. On the other hand I see a lot of truck bullies too. It gets more intimidating the smaller your vehicle is.