General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs the House in play now?
Sam Wang thinks it might be:
All of the arguments on this subject can and should be quantified. Its just like last years Presidential race: is any of this punditry data-based? Today I start to outline a true prediction. I give a toy model, i.e. step 1 toward something more realistic. The toy model relies on a prediction of popular vote only. At the end, I start to add a little bit of complication. I invite you to add more complication in comments.
Provisionally, it looks like the following: In a little over a week, the shutdown has increased the probability of a Democratic House takeover in 2014 from 13% to as high as 50%.
The first number (13%) is is exactly as expected if House trends were following expectations from analysts conventional wisdom and political science research. But the shutdown, combined with the fluidity of gerrymandered districts, has added a highly unexpected twist. The 50% figure could swing back toward the Republicans, or it could go further toward the Democrats. For certain, it gives a measure of an unusually fast change in the national mood. Lets dive in.
http://election.princeton.edu/
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Wave election in the making.
A year is an eternity in politics caveat applies though
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Those fools just do not learn from their mistakes, probably because they never admit to making mistakes. So, yeah, I think the House is very much in play.
trublu992
(489 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Silver is wrong in that regard. Democrats won by a margin of 1.4 points in 2012 and still managed to win 8 seats. If their margin approaches double digits, they'll swamp the Republicans ... even in Gerrymandered seats.
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)He is not measuring correctly.. He forgot a few numbers....
I predict a +140 swing on the Democratic side of the House for '14. Tea Party/FreedomWorks will be bankrupt and out of business. In fact, there's already financial issues for these organizations (now borrowing money to pay the bills)
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I think someone's smoking crack and it's not Silver.
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)You will see it when it comes...
pscot
(21,024 posts)to go away.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)And there is plenty more time for these people to do even more destructive and lunatic things before people go to the polls....
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)to right like they have been, voters will see no difference and loose.
I would rather have a Democratic candidate defeated for a Liberal viewpoint than trying to a Conservative.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)The cabal are in districts so safe they could crap on the house floor and get re elected.
pscot
(21,024 posts)Wang understands the edge gerrymandered district give the GOP. He's still guardedly optimistic.
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)And that's what will explode the gerrymandering efforts....
And then it will be corrected in time for the 2020 census.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)The GOP is counting on short memories. And it's not a bad bet.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Happens every time.
cali
(114,904 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,660 posts)but I live in a Dem district in a blue state, so I can't affect the outcome much.
I will vote, though. You can bet on that.
BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)I'll stick with the general consensus, rather than the outlier.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Too many think Silver is a genius for predicting elections. The fact is that anyone can do the same thing by averaging the final polls. It's really not that hard.