Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 08:57 AM Oct 2013

Denver floats new rules that could make even the odor of pot a crime

By Jeremy P. Meyer
The Denver Post

Even the smell of marijuana wafting from your backyard could be illegal if Denver City Council passes a new ordinance.

Denver officials, responding to fears that public pot consumption could become an ever-present problem in the Mile High City, will propose a set of new rules for open consumption and possession of marijuana.

The ordinance, being introduced at a committee meeting Monday in advance of the legalization of retail pot sales in January, would specifically ban marijuana from parks and the 16th Street Mall. It also would prohibit smoking on private property if it is visible to the public, such as on a front porch or in a car, or if the odor of pot could be detected from a neighboring property.

"Your activities should not pervade others' peace and ability to enjoy," said Denver Mayor Michael Hancock. "Marijuana is one of those elements that can be quite pervasive and invasive. I shouldn't have to smell your activities from your backyard."

If the ordinance is approved by council and signed by the mayor, it would take effect immediately. Offenders could face a fine of $999 and up to a year in jail.

more

http://www.denverpost.com/marijuana/ci_24284316/denver-floats-new-rules-that-could-make-even

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Denver floats new rules that could make even the odor of pot a crime (Original Post) n2doc Oct 2013 OP
No more outdoor barbecue Fumesucker Oct 2013 #1
You make a strong point about setting a precedent. What's limit to this sort of thing? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #5
Yep JanMichael Oct 2013 #15
Good for them The Straight Story Oct 2013 #2
When you say 'smokers' do you mean bbq's and other smokey outdoor cooking methods Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #6
+1 tridim Oct 2013 #8
And of course the other poster will not even try to explain why they think greasy whole pig Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #13
Was referring to previous arguments here about kicking smokers out of homes The Straight Story Oct 2013 #12
Ah. I think you should not be 'guessing that the same who were for are against' without Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #16
Actually not 'defending' it The Straight Story Oct 2013 #19
I'm trying to thnk of somewhere you could smoke pot ogradda Oct 2013 #3
Inside, but then they'll harass people with minor children. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #9
Smoke in front of a building's fresh air intake. kentauros Oct 2013 #18
The smell of hamburgers on a grill is "pervasive and invasive" pipoman Oct 2013 #4
It's harassment to ignore the people's will and impose their own. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #10
Well maybe they should get the facts on just how dangerous wood smoke is. WCLinolVir Oct 2013 #7
And Diesel exhaust n/t n2doc Oct 2013 #11
the single worst form of pollution reddread Oct 2013 #14
I think Denver already restricts fireplace usage. MindPilot Oct 2013 #20
Opening a can of worms? tularetom Oct 2013 #17
What about moxa sticks? Trillo Oct 2013 #21
they better start rounding up all skunks then frylock Oct 2013 #22

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
15. Yep
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:19 AM
Oct 2013

we are vegetarians. Hate the smell of cooking meat, and we live in BBQ Central. Ban it because it offends us. (it doesn't, but hell....banning "odors?" Please.)

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
2. Good for them
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:05 AM
Oct 2013

Just like with smokers, if someone else can smell it they are already dead (or something like that).

Those chickens people have been letting loose to run around for years are coming home to roost. Same principle, applied to a different situation - will be interesting to see how many abandon a ship they helped to build.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
6. When you say 'smokers' do you mean bbq's and other smokey outdoor cooking methods
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:11 AM
Oct 2013

which have odors that invade interior spaces as well as exterior whenever some random 'food head' decides he wants to have a 'cook out' on my block?
One assumes that smelly intrusion will be brought to an end as well.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. And of course the other poster will not even try to explain why they think greasy whole pig
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:17 AM
Oct 2013

bbq's lasting hours on end should be allowed to stank up the neighborhood while a few minutes of smelling someone smoke a joint in their own yard should not.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
12. Was referring to previous arguments here about kicking smokers out of homes
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:16 AM
Oct 2013

Because others complained about the smell of smoke. Guessing those same people that were for that are against this.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. Ah. I think you should not be 'guessing that the same who were for are against' without
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:19 AM
Oct 2013

showing proof of that. You seemed to be defending a law that would arrest a person for a tiny joint on fire but would allow a person to spend all day smelling up the block with wood coal and beef fat......

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
19. Actually not 'defending' it
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:22 AM
Oct 2013

Just using the same arguments others have in anticipation of them chiming in on the issue.

It is a stupid idea - but it is stupid across the board. And those people know who they are, not my job to identify them by name and against the rules anyway.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
9. Inside, but then they'll harass people with minor children.
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:14 AM
Oct 2013

In other words, eff you peasants and your amendment; we're going to do what we want to do and God help you if you get out of line.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
4. The smell of hamburgers on a grill is "pervasive and invasive"
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:08 AM
Oct 2013

as is perfume, fireplaces, farts, baby diapers, b.o., and a multitude of other odors...I've spent a fair amount of time in downtown denver and the smell of pot would be refreshing next to many other odors there. I understand no smoking in parks, on 16th street mall, and public areas..smoking in or at people's homes is a crock-o-shit and the good councilman and mayor should suffer the rejection of voters if they insist on undermining the vote of the people by putting people in jail for a year who are minding their own business on their own property..

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
7. Well maybe they should get the facts on just how dangerous wood smoke is.
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:12 AM
Oct 2013

More dangerous than cigarettes because your lungs can not get rid of the particulates that lodge in your lungs. Repeated exposure is a cancer risk.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
14. the single worst form of pollution
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:18 AM
Oct 2013

make that stink go away and the rest wont seem so totalitarian.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
17. Opening a can of worms?
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 09:19 AM
Oct 2013

What about cigar smoke? Back yard barbecuing? Farts? All of those can be quite "pervasive and invasive" as well.

Plus how the hell are they going enforce this?

Face it guys, it's legal. Live with it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Denver floats new rules t...