General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmazing comment posted to Will Pitt's piece on Truthout . . .
. . . And Will's article is a must-read!
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)markpkessinger
(8,397 posts). . . but that isn't really the point of my post, nor of the comment to Will's article.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)That was my point. We've never passed "healthcare". We've passed a scheme to to funnel private and government money into private enterprise.
So, "You'll never pass healthcare" is correct.
markpkessinger
(8,397 posts)... with the GOP, and the absurdity of the GOP's current complaints that the President isn't willing to negotiate. That comment certainly could have been stated more accurately, but I didn't misrepresent anything. And irrespective of the inaccuracy of the comment itself, its larger point stands. Sorry you failed to grasp that.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)I thought it was to show that they are complaining about Obama not wanting to negotiate when it is plain they have had their minds made up from the get-go and it will stay that way no doubt forever.
He sees no value in negotiating and playing games with them.
markpkessinger
(8,397 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)It's buy minimal insurance if you have the financial means or pay an alternative tax. Not buy insurance no matter your financial means or go to jail. This argument has already been settled.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)and the increased tax amount is a penalty enforceable under the tax code. code is another word for law.
Nine
(1,741 posts)And "under penalty of law" certainly makes it sound like there are criminal penalties.
If it makes you feel better, instead of thinking of the alternative payment as a "tax penalty" for not buying insurance when you can afford it, think of NOT having to pay the alternative payment as a tax credit for doing something to offset the government's cost of healthcare.
But as I said, this has already been settled, so your talking point is out of date.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)because you CAN'T afford it.
or buying insurance with a 6000 deductible that makes it practically unusable.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)I think it's going around on FB.
Same incorrect year for SCOTUS decision on ACA. Should be 2012.
markpkessinger
(8,397 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I love infographics, but not when they're inaccurate.
I hope somebody can re-do this in a more accurate version!
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)but foolishly thought he was "our" William Pitt and wrote in DU for his own fun and amusement for our benefit, appreciation and edification because he is so well-informed...
Thanks for posting the link. I thought he was too good to be here.
markpkessinger
(8,397 posts). . . not sure what you're saying here.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Is he the same? Damned if I know....
markpkessinger
(8,397 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)yes INDEED
eridani
(51,907 posts)... the likely product of a test-tube combination between a dented egg from Phyllis Schlafly and the weakest sperm Joe McCarthy ever produced, hates the very idea of socialized medicine."
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)markpkessinger
(8,397 posts)JSK
(1,123 posts)markpkessinger
(8,397 posts). . . and the point it makes is valid nonetheless.
cali
(114,904 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)nt
IADEMO2004
(5,554 posts)and I didn't see Will's piece either so good on you again.
ThomThom
(1,486 posts)will bring this country down
people are beginning to see what crap these fools keep pushing