Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:16 PM Oct 2013

Should Obama allow a default if the GOP doesn't back down?

Last edited Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:50 PM - Edit history (1)

Just trying to get a sense of where fellow DUers stand.


21 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes--default if the GOP doesn\'t back down
17 (81%)
No--compromise with the GOP on the debt limit is better than default
4 (19%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Obama allow a default if the GOP doesn't back down? (Original Post) woolldog Oct 2013 OP
Negotiate with what? n/t leftstreet Oct 2013 #1
fixed to make it more clear. woolldog Oct 2013 #3
Weird poll. ProSense Oct 2013 #2
It is impossible to answer the subject line question with a 'no', cause ya typed a second question Tx4obama Oct 2013 #4
Yup, I want to say No, Southside Oct 2013 #22
he's already made concessions RainDog Oct 2013 #5
Negotiate with whom? Boehner certainly cannot engage his caucus. Mass Oct 2013 #6
Your title doesn't match your text on the alternatives. Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #7
Might be a good idea to delete this thread and start over with one that is not so confusing. Tx4obama Oct 2013 #8
sorry about the title guys woolldog Oct 2013 #9
No, you didn't, and I think it was deliberate. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #11
lol, what? woolldog Oct 2013 #13
No, but I think you knew exactly why you phrased the question and answers the way you did. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #17
Enlighten me then. woolldog Oct 2013 #19
Really? ProSense Oct 2013 #21
"I know people are going to vote for the second choice"? woolldog Oct 2013 #26
Right, ProSense Oct 2013 #27
I see what you mean now. woolldog Oct 2013 #28
Once a poll has been posted and folks have 'voted' then it should NOT be changed... Tx4obama Oct 2013 #31
I discreetly edited it to eliminate the confusion, woolldog Oct 2013 #33
I will do as Tx4obama suggested Hutzpa Oct 2013 #35
Seriously? woolldog Oct 2013 #36
Yep, seriously. nt Hutzpa Oct 2013 #38
It's LAW Politicalboi Oct 2013 #10
It depends on the whole package. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #12
woolldog....Tear down this poll. RagAss Oct 2013 #14
NO TO EXTORTION ruffburr Oct 2013 #15
No concessions. If the GOP wants to default us, then let's go. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #16
This is pretty much how I feel. woolldog Oct 2013 #18
I'm not voting. The entire blackmail via default threat is WRONG steve2470 Oct 2013 #20
Hell no. lpbk2713 Oct 2013 #23
The devil is in the details as to what "compromise" or "concessions" mean. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #24
~ This must be one of the WORST worded polls on DU ever ~ Tx4obama Oct 2013 #25
stop being such a poll snob woolldog Oct 2013 #29
This is the most poorly worded post I have ever seen here except possibly by... Walk away Oct 2013 #30
Neither. Salviati Oct 2013 #32
you need a third option: 14th Amendment yurbud Oct 2013 #34
+1,000,000 JaneQPublic Oct 2013 #39
yep, i was looking for that one 0rganism Oct 2013 #40
Obama has repeatedly stated, woolldog Oct 2013 #41
The Dems will find a workaround flamingdem Oct 2013 #37
I'd be behind him. treestar Oct 2013 #42

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Weird poll.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:19 PM
Oct 2013

The response to the title question would be no, but you made the choices a response to the "or" question.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
4. It is impossible to answer the subject line question with a 'no', cause ya typed a second question
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:20 PM
Oct 2013

The answers in the poll section do not match the question in the subject line

Southside

(338 posts)
22. Yup, I want to say No,
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:31 PM
Oct 2013

But my No option would be: No, Obama should stand his ground and not give in to ransom demands haha. Or something inflammatory like that.

Either way I support my President in this. The Tea Party has already backed down on removing, defunding or whatever else they want on ObamaCare. Great job Mr. president, you have given enough the past 4+ years, more concessions than you wanted to give to keep things going.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
6. Negotiate with whom? Boehner certainly cannot engage his caucus.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:20 PM
Oct 2013

They do not agree with each other, as we can see by the change of strategy at least once a day.

I certainly could go for some if there was a chance to pass them, but negotiating to hear Boehner ask more once he meets with his caucus. What is the point?

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
7. Your title doesn't match your text on the alternatives.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:20 PM
Oct 2013

I voted no, which is a vote FOR compromise, as far as I can tell.
Anyway, I figure he has to do something if this comes down to the last hours and Boehner's still being an ass. The problem is that the debt ceiling is in fact a nuclear bomb. The idea would be to show that Boehner was willing to actually blow up the economy just to save his orangey ass, and Obama wasn't, and then campaign like mad against the GOP next year on the fact they were willing to destroy us to get their way.
It's awful, but if it comes down to it, it's the only thing he can do.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
19. Enlighten me then.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:28 PM
Oct 2013

Because I have no clue what you're talking about. I put about 20 seconds thought (and that's being generous) into this poll

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
21. Really?
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:30 PM
Oct 2013

"Because I have no clue what you're talking about. I put about 20 seconds thought (and that's being generous) into this poll"

You knew it was confusing. Look at comments 5 through 7. You claim to have fixed it, but you now people are going to vote for the second choice if they don't see the confusing frame.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
26. "I know people are going to vote for the second choice"?
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:38 PM
Oct 2013

Um no I don't "now" that.

I assume my fellow DUers are all literate, intelligent people and are perfectly capable of responding to an internet poll. You must have an awfully dim view of your fellow posters intellect.

And I did fix it to make it less confusing. You can go through my edits if you don't believe me. I am a bit flattered you think I'm so devious and cunning that I purposely come up with confusing internet polls to post on DU...to what end you think I do this, I have no idea.

Good day to you, Madam.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
27. Right,
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:40 PM
Oct 2013

"I assume my fellow DUers are all literate, intelligent people and are perfectly capable of responding to an internet poll. You must have an awfully dim view of your fellow posters intellect. "

...that's why you think you "fixed it": http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023810194#post9

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
28. I see what you mean now.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:44 PM
Oct 2013

But cmon, get off my back. If you have a different title suggestion, post it and Ill use it.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
31. Once a poll has been posted and folks have 'voted' then it should NOT be changed...
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:48 PM
Oct 2013

Your best option, as I see it, is to self-delete the thread/poll and start over with a correctly worded poll.



Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
35. I will do as Tx4obama suggested
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:57 PM
Oct 2013

I have tried reading your poll several times and am confused as to what you're trying to accomplish.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
10. It's LAW
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:21 PM
Oct 2013

They can't do this. There is NO negotiating with these clowns. They want Obamacare to end NOW! Fuck them. Or Obama can use the 14 amendment and of coarse get impeached by the house. But that impeachment would go into the 2014 elections. I say, let them do it.
How many GOP members will be left in the house? They'll be lucky to hold 100.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. It depends on the whole package.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:23 PM
Oct 2013

Would I trade a year's delay in the individual mandate for a 6 week extension? Of course not.

Would I trade the medical device tax for abolishing the debt ceiling? Absolutely.

 
16. No concessions. If the GOP wants to default us, then let's go.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:25 PM
Oct 2013

And I speak as someone this will hurt tremendously.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
18. This is pretty much how I feel.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:26 PM
Oct 2013

At some point you have to draw the line or else they will keep using their bully tactics to get their way. Compromising with them only leads to them using this type of technique more often.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
20. I'm not voting. The entire blackmail via default threat is WRONG
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:28 PM
Oct 2013

I'm still hopeful that *some* of the Republicans are sane enough to vote with Democrats to head off a default. If we start doing business via default blackmail, it will never end and the nation will be irreversibly damaged.

lpbk2713

(42,757 posts)
23. Hell no.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:32 PM
Oct 2013



They are on the ropes. Let them stew in their own juices until they are ready to throw in the towel.


Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
24. The devil is in the details as to what "compromise" or "concessions" mean.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:35 PM
Oct 2013

Thanks for the thread, woolldog.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
30. This is the most poorly worded post I have ever seen here except possibly by...
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:47 PM
Oct 2013

the Gun Lobby. Why would anyone leave this unedited?

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
32. Neither.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 06:52 PM
Oct 2013

He should wait until the last possible instant, and then mint the damn trillion dollar coin. Make it clear to all that the republicans were perfectly willing to take the whole country over the cliff.

It's a silly but (at least to my, and other better minds) completely legal way to resolve the situation. It's a ridiculous solution to this ridiculous manufactured crisis. The republicans are sabotaging the government by playing completely within the legal boundaries, while violating the norms and spirit of our government. If Obama has to respond in kind, so be it.

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
39. +1,000,000
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 07:24 PM
Oct 2013

Bingo.

If Obama would invoke the 14th, half the world would pump their fist in the air and yell "YES!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Obama allow a defa...