General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert Reich on MSNBC saying after 2011 he believes Obama
"has learned you cannot negotiate with extortionists....once you do that the expectation is you're going to do it next time and their demands get larger and larger. So the President has decided, and I'm sure he has decided, that he cannot do this ever again."
I love RR and hope to hell he is right. I'm really starting to get scared.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)I saw a lady in the grocery store this morning with two carts of food, she told the clerk, she was stocking up in case the "ceiling falls".
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)But I'm not scared at all. I'm hopeful because this disaster can mean the end of Teapublicans and the Koch Bros' reign over our government.
doc03
(35,344 posts)blame them, it worked before. I just hope RR is right.
patricia92243
(12,597 posts)right about not negotiating with extortionists, but I wonder where it will all end. Did he say what he thinks is going to happen?
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I tend to like him more than Krugman for some reason.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Those was his last words; prior to that he was explaining the debt ceiling and it's consequences in simple terms.
Unfortunately, I doubt the voters that need to be educated the most were watching...the ones that always vote against their best interest and screw us along with themselves.
maryellen99
(3,789 posts)If its not on Fox its not true
pipoman
(16,038 posts)a rethug thinker and doer who pretends to be a Democrat..
pipoman
(16,038 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gerald-mcentee/robert-reichs-endorsement_b_97450.html
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)This one is two years old:
http://robertreich.org/post/6538345540
"Why the Republican War on Workers Rights Undermines the American Economy"
pipoman
(16,038 posts)he was secretary of labor..I choose not to be fooled twice..
Oh, and again in this piece of crap writing, denying his role in corporate greed, pretending the rethugs are our only enemy...what a worthless slug he is..
Maybe I would listen if he came before us and admitted his transgressions to labor and the US economy...til then he is just trying to salvage his worthless record.
Oh, and did time take away his Forbes impersonation in his book? Has he publicly recanted the corporate whore talk in the book? I didn't think so..
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Why We Need Stronger Unions, and How to Get Them
pipoman
(16,038 posts)constantly and repeatedly refusing to acknowledge his own significant role in the destruction of US labor. Pretending that free trade is great for labor. Acting as though his complete and total disregard for labor, wasn't disregard for labor. Talking a good talk now, doing evil deeds when he had the opportunity to actually make a difference.
No, Reich is an enemy of US labor and a hero of 3rd world labor. He is a liar and a text book charlatan.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Bi-lateral trade between the U.S. and Mexico, prior to NAFTA was 1.4% of the U.S. GDP. That's all trade, including raw minerals (including oil) and agricultural products. Even with a large increase in imports and exports with Mexico, one would have a hard to finding more than a minor effect overall U.S. economy.
NAFTA certainly didn't help matters, but to say that it caused the "destruction" of U.S. labor -- something that will come as a surprise to the more than 14 million Americans who are union members -- is something of an overstatement. Free Trade is not (in itself) the problem. The problem is a system that has been rigged to favor Wall Street over Main Street -- one that gives tax breaks to companies to ship their jobs overseas to places where workers and the environment they live in are exploited in unimaginable ways.
Should we be making free trade agreements that don't ALSO include significant concessions that protect both American and foreign workers? That's a damned good point of discussion. In my opinion, the failure of both Reich and the Clinton Administration is that got plenty of one and precious little of the other.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Exactly why he completely ignored every labor union...some 80% of the population and 90% of labor and fed his corporate masters. Did he do it himself? No. He claims he didn't do it to this day. He's either an idiot (and we both know he isn't), or he's a liar.
If Reich admitted his role we could move on. Instead he has consistently denied his role. Intolerable.
Believe me, I have strong opinions on trade..another day perhaps. This is about the lying SOS Robert Reich.
Oh and surely you don't cruise these parts proclaiming the fine condition of labor in the US and that labor is oh so much better since NAFTA?
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)You seem to have an unnatural hatred toward the guy. One normally doesn't see this level of venom reserved for a former Secretary of Labor.
"If Reich admitted his role we could move on."
I think that moving on would be a good idea for you. Reich was an imperfect politician who didn't accomplish everything he set out to do -- but it's not 1994 any more and it hasn't been for nearly 20 years.
Fight the next battle.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)of the highest levels being canonized on a Democratic board. Yet he continues his crusade for corporate greed. Maybe you wish to trust him further, I refuse to trust someone who kicks me in the teeth until they admit they were wrong.
Oh, and I hate nobody.
Oh, and LOL...Reich is like 4' tall, I'm thinking he was the one getting panted..
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)CrispyQ
(36,475 posts)This is the most spine Obama has shown. If it weren't his signature legislation on the table, would he fight so hard?
I hope RR is right.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)"The system isn't broken. It is fixed." That is something that almost nobody seems to understand. The system is working exactly as the 0.1% want it to. It isn't broken at all. It is working as designed.
And "the fix" is not a new thing. It certainly goes back to the the Koch's John Birch Society of the 50s, the formation of the private bank owned by aristocrats in complete control of our money supply (i.e. the Fed), Standard Oil and all the other super-corporations of the early 1900s, and the robber barons before them. Our whole national history is just one wave after another of the 0.1% trying to extract blood from the other 99.9%. The only difference this time is that they now effective have complete control over our government, our military, and our media. They have been working on this for well over 150 years, and have finally succeeded in a totalitarian way.
lame54
(35,293 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)aware of the fact that you cant negotiate with terrorists, blackmailers, and today's Republicans.
The left has been screaming this from the get-go. Maybe the President got bad advice from all the conservatives he has surrounding him.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)I'll always wonder why Obama didn't figure this out sooner, like most of us.
Now if only he has another come to Jesus moment, an epiphany, and figures out how bad this TPP he's pushing is for average citizens. TPP, a trade deal on steroids now with so much more awful.
Response to RiffRandell (Original post)
SHRED This message was self-deleted by its author.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,734 posts)That's how terrorists win!
The roof will not collapse all at once, there will be time to "save" yourself.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)And remember, the Republican's majority in the House is only 17=18 votes. We can probably get that many Republicans to take the risk and vote for sanity.
We Democrats have nothing to lose really. We don't represent the rich guys. We lost our money in 2008.
The Republicans are a much smaller minority in the country than they think. They lost the popular vote in 2000, arguably won/lost the election in Ohio in 2004 (depends on your view on what happened there), lost in 2008 and lost in 2012. They have a majority of seats on the Supreme Court. So, they have a 1/4 majority in the House, half the Supreme Court and some votes in the Senate. The presidency is Democratic. Republicans have to give up and shut up or we lose any sense of democracy.
Hey! Democrats did not want Roberts or Alito on the Supreme Court, but we went with it because a Republican was in the White House. We gave in because we were in the minority.
Republicans are in the minority. They have to give in to Democrats who are in the majority. If you are a Republican, get used to it because the Republican Party is extreme and out of touch with America. You are not going to have it any better. You are moving into the permanent minority. Good riddance.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 8, 2013, 03:02 PM - Edit history (1)
Edited as I thought you were calling me a Republican.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)who don't have anything don't have a hell of a lot left to lose. I talk with a lot of people, and many seem to be under the impression that if everything spins apart the ones that will be most hurt will be those on the bottom, but in my experience they dig and scramble every stinking day just to get through, so this will be nothing new for them. But it's a common misconception of people who do things "for" others instead of "like" them.
It's the people with more, especially those with much more who are totally unprepared for the kind of future their support of conservative policies could bring them. And I find that damn funny.
So don't be scared. A lot of what we do is in support of keeping the assets of people like Mi$$ RobMe intact, and we might find that after a period of unsettlement which may or may not hurt more people than our current system is hurting those with the least that we might all be better off in the long term.
munster69
(107 posts)President Obama wishes he never negotiated with them during the last extortion event. We all know if we give them anything Boner will be on TV claiming he got 90% on what he asked for.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)but WTF took him so long