Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peregrine Took

(7,413 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 11:43 AM Oct 2013

I have repeatedly heard that the WH wants to help Boehner save face.

Also, I've heard other Dems say that he's a "nice guy" or a "good guy" and its too bad that he is at the mercy of the Tea Party, etc.

I despise him and always have and I just don't understand their esteem for him.

Is it because they would rather have him than whiny little Eric?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have repeatedly heard that the WH wants to help Boehner save face. (Original Post) Peregrine Took Oct 2013 OP
I haven't heard anyone say they want to help him save face. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #1
I do not hear any of the Democratic leadership, including the President saying that lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #2
May be in the past, but not this time around. Mass Oct 2013 #3
I agree. Andy823 Oct 2013 #5
At the end of the day he is in the club and.... Bonhomme Richard Oct 2013 #4
I've heard the opposite. PragmaticLiberal Oct 2013 #6
I don't know where you're hearing things TBF Oct 2013 #7
It's a tough question, actually WilliamPitt Oct 2013 #8
Damned if he stays, damned if he goes. backscatter712 Oct 2013 #9
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. I haven't heard anyone say they want to help him save face.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 11:45 AM
Oct 2013

Democrats appear to be thoroughly enjoying his public humiliation.

Especially Harry Reid.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
3. May be in the past, but not this time around.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 11:47 AM
Oct 2013

They behave as if they want him out. They have had calculated they needed somebody more able to have control of his caucus, even if it may be potentially more conservative.

It is painfully obvious the GOP does not know what they want. They float propositions to abandon them immediately and move on to the next one. What will come after the supercommittee.

I also think that there is a leadership vacuum. Nobody wants to be speaker of this House so it stays on Boehner's incompetent head.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
5. I agree.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 12:17 PM
Oct 2013

I really think that after this royal mess by the republicans, that no matter who was speaker, they would have the same problems, and whoever is speaker would have to take the heat for the "next" mess caused by the tea party clowns. Who in their right mind would want to be speaker when they wouldn't be able to control the idiots on their crazy far out left wing. It would be political suicide. Cantor may have wanted it earlier, but I really doubt if he would now.

TBF

(32,062 posts)
7. I don't know where you're hearing things
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 12:38 PM
Oct 2013

but the polls are in the President's favor. If anything it's Boner looking to save face.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
8. It's a tough question, actually
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 12:39 PM
Oct 2013

A lot of people are legitimately worried about a true fucking raving lunatic taking the Speaker's gavel if Boehner falls.

He's basically less than useless, true enough, but if anyone thinks he's as bad as it can get...no no no no, he is not.

So.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
9. Damned if he stays, damned if he goes.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 01:24 PM
Oct 2013

Well, that explains why Eric Cantor hasn't put a shiv in Boehner's back - he doesn't want to be in the hot seat if he doesn't have the power to make his caucus follow orders.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have repeatedly heard t...