Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 10:21 AM Oct 2013

I bet you can guess where the poorest cities in the US are...

10. Dalton, Ga.
• Population: 142,741
• Income: $32,858

9. Forest City, N.C.
• Population: 67,538
• Income: $32,836

8. Nacogdoches, Texas
• Population: 65,466
• Income: $32,555

7. Martinsville, Va.
• Population: 67,300
• Income: $32,196

6. Cookeville, Tenn.
• Population: 106,498
• Income: $31,813

5. Talladega-Sylacauga, Ala.
• Population: 81,664
• Income: $31,547

4. Brownsville-Harlingen, Texas
• Population: 414,123
• Income: $30,953

3. Roanoke Rapids, N.C.
• Population: 76,066
• Income:$29,930

2. Gallup, N.M.
• Population: 73,664
• Income: $29,696

1. Lumberton, N.C.
• Population: 135,517
• Income: $28,293

http://homes.yahoo.com/news/the-poorest-cities-in-america-172735755.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
4. I don't have a map for that, but look at this map as derived
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 11:22 AM
Oct 2013

from population densities per county for the 2012 Presidential election:





Brownsville is as solid a blue as the Northeast, yet listed as one of the ten poorest. Money doesn't mean that much in voting records just by Brownsville alone, and it's the largest population of the ten. And as dixiegrrrrl points out, a little money goes much further in these places than it does in other parts of the country. That list needs to be adjusted to reflect that fact.

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
2. I'm only surprised at some of the cities that aren't on the list.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 10:31 AM
Oct 2013

All of those are decent-sized towns and cities, though, so I guess that's why some of the places I was thinking of aren't on there. My state is mostly made up of small towns, so there really aren't many cities here that have enough population to make the list.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. That income goes a lot further in Southern towns
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 11:04 AM
Oct 2013

than in other areas of the country.
Which is why so many people choose to retire in Southern areas.

another factor is how much of that measured income is taxable,
Many people down here pay little or no taxes on their retirement incomes.
Property taxes in our state do not apply to those over 65, or those who are disabled.(think disabled military vets)

So the term "poor" is very misleading unless all factors are included.




carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
5. misleading in two ways-- these are MSA population numbers, not cities
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 08:22 PM
Oct 2013

and the poorest places in the US are overwhelmingly NOT in MSAs at all-- rural counties concentrated in SD, TX, KY, as well as across the Deep South. When you look at poorest "places" rather than cities, here are the 25 worst off, much much poorer than those listed in the OP

1.Allen, South Dakota $1,539, (420)
2.Cuevitas, Texas $1,703, (37)
3.Brundage, Texas $2,371, (31)
4.Wounded Knee, South Dakota $2,403, (328) [1]
5.Tobin, California $2,584, (11)
6.Los Angeles Subdivision, Texas $2,701, (86)
7.Tagg Flats, Oklahoma $2,774, (11)
8.Elmo, Montana $2,778, (143)
9.McNary, Arizona $2,917, (349)
10.Parmelee, South Dakota $2,946, (650)
11.East Dunseith, North Dakota $3,026, (219)
12.Boys Town, Nebraska $3,048, (818)
13.Green Grass, South Dakota $3,135, (58)
14.Belden, California $3,141, (26)
15.South Alamo, Texas $3,162, (3,101)
16.Muniz, Texas $3,230, (1,106)
17.Lago, Texas $3,346, (246)
18.Lukachukai, Arizona $3,380, (1,565)
19.Nageezi, New Mexico $3,502, (296)
20.Redford, Texas $3,577, (132)
21.Indian Hills, Texas $3,583 (2,036)
22.El Cenizo, Texas $3,610 (3,545)
23.Little Eagle, South Dakota $3,632 (370)
24.Del Mar Heights, Texas $3,665 (259)
25.Aleneva, Alaska $3,707


nolabear

(41,984 posts)
6. Odd, I was born in #5. Was there a few years ago. Not that poor.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 08:26 PM
Oct 2013

Seriously. What it is these days is rather old, an old cotton mill town full of retired workers after it shut down and they stayed. They don't tend to have a lot of money but they aren't poor poor.

Something skewed here.

Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
7. I thought Detroit, Michigan might be up there somewhere, I guess they're turning things around?
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 08:31 PM
Oct 2013

Last edited Tue Oct 8, 2013, 09:03 PM - Edit history (1)

Thanks for the thread, cynatnite.

former9thward

(32,016 posts)
9. In large cities there are always super wealthy that skew the stats.
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 09:02 PM
Oct 2013

Even in Detroit. The wealthy don't live in the small cities/towns listed in the OP.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
10. the Blue Dog congressman who represents Lumberton voted FOR the shutdown
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 09:32 PM
Oct 2013

I was aghast to see that Mike McIntyre, whose constituents are in desperate need of Obamacare, was one of the few Democrats in Congress this week who refused to support the president and instead sided with the Republicans. Seeing that it is the poorest MSA in the nation only makes this more disgusting. He needs a primary opponent. This man lives in Lumberton, which is considerably whiter (48%) than the rest of Robeson County, which is 1/3 Native American and 1/3 African American.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
11. He has the most GOP district held by a Democrat in the entire country
Tue Oct 8, 2013, 09:39 PM
Oct 2013

He won by fewer than 400 votes. As useless as he is, and he is useless, no one even a micron more useful could hold that seat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I bet you can guess where...