General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHealthcare.gov - So bad you have to start asking: Sabotage????
I mean, after a week, I can't log in and verify my profile.
Screw looking at my options or God forbid applying. I can't log on. I'm not alone.
AMY GOODMAN: "We apologize for the inconvenience. The Marketplace is currently undergoing regularly scheduled maintenance and will be back up Monday (10/7/3013)." Thats right, October 7th, 3013. Thats the message New Yorkers received this weekend when they attempted to sign up for health insurance via the new online health exchange or marketplace, a key component of "Obamacare."
While the New York site has taken down the notice, widespread computer problems have plagued websites across the nation since the state and federal marketplaces launched last Tuesday. Visitors to the federal healthcare.gov website also received a warning message reading, quote, "The system is down at the moment. Were currently performing scheduled maintenance. Please try again later."
Its unclear how many people have actually been able to sign up so far anywhere in the country for health insurance. The administration has not released any figures. According to Forbes, the number might be in the single digits, when they looked, for example, at California. On Tuesday, President Obama promised quick fixes to the problems.
...
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/7/computer_glitches_plague_obamacare_launch_as
Now, I'm not saying "The Government" is screwing this up on purpose. But if the Koch Brothers are willing to spend billions to kill Obamacare, how hard would it be to payoff a sufficiently senior programmer to produce a system that passes QA, but bombs COMPLETELY on rollout?
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)The White House didn't provide numbers so we'll just make shit up.
And talk about conspiracy theories. Ugh.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Hope your post draws some inputs.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Get real.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)The Kochs would never stoop to that. What was I thinking?
mshasta
(2,108 posts)is not a conspiracy but it is something to be concern.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I think you can guess the response around here.
I actually self deleted it, but you can tell what it was about from the responses
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023771667
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Half of the error messages tell you your profile exists - Half of the error messages tell you your profile DOESN'T exist.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)this adds to the number of people that couldn't get in on an already overloaded system who keep trying every day.
Mass
(27,315 posts)There has clearly been problems, and anybody who has written complex programs knows that they are hard to test. They also seem to have been surprised by the interest and their servers may have been too small. This said, using Forbes numbers is just stupid. What next, WND?
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)The complaint morphs from being technically inept to security inept. Are we supposed to give this website personally identifiable information?
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)So, I'm doubting anyone can steal the info..I hope....
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Yeah, I get like that sometimes myself but at least mine is chemically induced.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)CA today that the website problems are due to high volume traffic.
So put two and two together.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)With DDOS attacks, you get long pauses followed by site-not-found messages.
REP
(21,691 posts)A rollout of a massive program's website with millions of people trying to log on having technical difficulties in the early phases? This never happens! Just ask Apple or Google or Amazon or Netflix ... It must a DDOS attack.
Jesus wept.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)works like it was designed by corporate consultants who know very little web design. For instance, they had (initially) people loading 63 different script and CSS files -- something that should have been consolidated on the fly to two. This increases load by a huge amount.
It also seems like its hitting multiple databases really hard. Database reads should not be so intensive unless they're poorly designed, and you can throw more resources at the problem (database writes are harder to deal with).
The whole thing acts and looks like a combination of EDS and IBM designed it for a corporate intranet, rather than someone with expertise like google or even yahoo.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)has a track record of not being able to do this complex of the job. They couldn't even pull off the same thing for Canada.
Holly_Hobby
(3,033 posts)Here's my thread I started earlier today about this issue in the computer help group:
[link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/10958405|
I have tried everything I can think of and the things suggested on the reply to my thread...without success.
Absolutely unacceptable. Something is going on.
Ohio Joe
(21,761 posts)Most, if not all red states decided not to create web sites so that all the people there would have to use the govt site. You have more then half the country trying to use a single site... Why would anyone not expect delays with it?
Roland99
(53,342 posts)gee...how could it not work perfectly from day 1???
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)No one I know can register. We promptly hit bugs. This isn't just "excess traffic" - it's completely dysfunctional software.
And it's so dysfunctional, it starts to beg questions.
temeraire
(1 post)I work in IT.
The idea that you can spend $200 million and get a site where people CAN'T LOG IN is outrageous. It is beyond incompetent. They could have used AWS (Amazon) which is instantly scaleable -- if it's a matter of traffic, which I doubt. The 'glitches' reported are a lot more than glitches. This isn't just 'site unavailable' -- it's a site which is completely riddled with errors. Simply astounding. Where did the money go?? I for one have begun to think that it almost has to be sabotage. Nothing could have been done this poorly (by the private sector, what's more!) unless it was done on purpose.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Why HealthCare.gov Isn't Like A Typical E-Commerce Site
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=239534289
I agree with the premise that the site should have worked more like a mortgage application site - enter some specifics (age, income), get a ballpark figure of what you're likely to pay, and then only enter your personal details when you're ready to buy.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)uppityperson
(115,679 posts)If this makes sense, it will. If it makes no sense, ignore it. If that makes sense.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)The glitches are mostly related to all the other sites that have to be accessed through this site. It has links to the IRS, SSA, as well as all the different insurance companies. If even one of the links is to a site that is not working properly, everything fails. It is possible that some of these insurance companies did not have the server capacity for the volume it needed. There were ways to avoid this, and you are correct that they should have done better, but this is not even comparable to marketplace sites.
Welcome to DU.