General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhich of these names would be *NOT* be racist for a team to call themselves?
2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
The Washington Redskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
The Washington Whiteskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
The Washington Blackskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
The Washington Brownskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
The Washington Yellowskins | |
0 (0%) |
|
All would be racist or racially insensitive and insulting. | |
2 (100%) |
|
None of the above are racist or racially insulting. | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)Dude, come on!
panader0
(25,816 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,420 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I dont know what logo you'd put on their helmets
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Seems a tad -- unwieldy.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)They're LOADED.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It is a nickname for a football and it kinda fits for Congress too.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It sort of implies Washington is -THE- model for headcheese, and we all know cheeseheads belong in Green Bay
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)It's like clockwork
pintobean
(18,101 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and what's even harder is that when you can't figure out how to answer, you check that answer in the poll.
and days later, you then delete it.
ironic that in the discussion between you and Captain Obvious, it is you that's the Obvious one.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023752343
pintobean
(18,101 posts)that I think are crap, or when the pollster's motives are in question.
The pass option is automatically included in every poll - by admins' design. If you have a problem with it, I'd recommend taking it up in ATA.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)so that the admins won't notice...
your cowardly protest (that is never evident for actual trolls...)
panader0
(25,816 posts)I'm sorry, I couldn't stop my fingers.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Ninety percent of Indians took that position, while 9 percent said they found the name offensive. One percent had no answer. The margin of sampling error for those findings was plus or minus two percentage points.
http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/downloads/political_communication/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf
And here is a poll of Americans in general:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/22184060/ap-poll-79-percent-support-redskins-keeping-their-name
As far as I'm concerned, that ends the debate. When Native Americans become offended by the use of the Redskins name, then we'll talk, otherwise it's just an ironic situation of a tiny minority of whites being offended when Native Americans aren't.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The vast majority could care less. But carry on with your lonely crusade, OP.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)hey, whatever floats your boat.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Because racism requires power to do harm through discrimination. I don't think white people have anything to fear yet.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,196 posts)(Yes, that's Keith Olbermann on the right.)
lame54
(35,321 posts)BKH70041
(961 posts)Especially given how crummy Carolina's been playing the last few years.
And the panther on the helmet is black. What's up with that?