Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 02:34 PM Oct 2013

Which of these names would be *NOT* be racist for a team to call themselves?


2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
The Washington Redskins
0 (0%)
The Washington Whiteskins
0 (0%)
The Washington Blackskins
0 (0%)
The Washington Brownskins
0 (0%)
The Washington Yellowskins
0 (0%)
All would be racist or racially insensitive and insulting.
2 (100%)
None of the above are racist or racially insulting.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which of these names would be *NOT* be racist for a team to call themselves? (Original Post) CreekDog Oct 2013 OP
You couldn't have included the Washington Foreskins? Dr. Strange Oct 2013 #1
The Washington Brownshirts panader0 Oct 2013 #2
They public would confuse that with the Republican House. n/t Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #7
the fans would wear turtle necks in the stands NightWatcher Oct 2013 #3
Washington KFC Chickenskins Jamaal510 Oct 2013 #4
Washington Kentucky Fried Chicken Chickenskins? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #6
Washington Potato Skins .... JoePhilly Oct 2013 #8
But honor and respect. Iggo Oct 2013 #5
How about The Pigskins? Motown_Johnny Oct 2013 #9
Um, Congress==Washington Pigheads HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #22
Which is why it would just be a nod to Congress...n/t Motown_Johnny Oct 2013 #24
Honestly, I could go with Pigheads or Washington Chitlins....pigskins seems presumptuous HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #25
"1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided." Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #10
It should be obvious, Captain. pintobean Oct 2013 #12
i know that this and many issues are too hard for you to state an opinion on CreekDog Oct 2013 #19
I vote pass on all polls pintobean Oct 2013 #20
and then you delete those responses later CreekDog Oct 2013 #21
How about The Washington RedSkinners? panader0 Oct 2013 #11
Poll: 90% of Native Americans aren't offended, 79% of Americans don't want it changed LittleBlue Oct 2013 #13
That comports with my anecdotal experience. I have known lots of Native Americans. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2013 #15
you want Obama to carry on with his lonely crusade? CreekDog Oct 2013 #23
The Whiteskins. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #14
Besides, the "Fightin' Whities" is already taken... Buns_of_Fire Oct 2013 #18
How about the Washington Potato Skins lame54 Oct 2013 #16
If I were a Panther I would complain BKH70041 Oct 2013 #17

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
25. Honestly, I could go with Pigheads or Washington Chitlins....pigskins seems presumptuous
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 05:34 PM
Oct 2013

It sort of implies Washington is -THE- model for headcheese, and we all know cheeseheads belong in Green Bay

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
19. i know that this and many issues are too hard for you to state an opinion on
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 05:04 PM
Oct 2013

and what's even harder is that when you can't figure out how to answer, you check that answer in the poll.

and days later, you then delete it.

ironic that in the discussion between you and Captain Obvious, it is you that's the Obvious one.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023752343

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
20. I vote pass on all polls
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 05:20 PM
Oct 2013

that I think are crap, or when the pollster's motives are in question.

The pass option is automatically included in every poll - by admins' design. If you have a problem with it, I'd recommend taking it up in ATA.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
21. and then you delete those responses later
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 05:25 PM
Oct 2013

so that the admins won't notice...

your cowardly protest (that is never evident for actual trolls...)

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
13. Poll: 90% of Native Americans aren't offended, 79% of Americans don't want it changed
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 04:12 PM
Oct 2013
Most American Indians say that calling Washington’s professional football team the “Redskins” does not bother them, the University of Pennsylvania’s National Annenberg Election Survey shows.

Ninety percent of Indians took that position, while 9 percent said they found the name “offensive.” One percent had no answer. The margin of sampling error for those findings was plus or minus two percentage points.

http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/downloads/political_communication/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf

And here is a poll of Americans in general:

In an AP poll of 1,004 adults conducted in mid-April, an overwhelming 79 percent of respondents favored the Redskins keeping their nickname.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/22184060/ap-poll-79-percent-support-redskins-keeping-their-name

As far as I'm concerned, that ends the debate. When Native Americans become offended by the use of the Redskins name, then we'll talk, otherwise it's just an ironic situation of a tiny minority of whites being offended when Native Americans aren't.
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
15. That comports with my anecdotal experience. I have known lots of Native Americans.
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 04:21 PM
Oct 2013

The vast majority could care less. But carry on with your lonely crusade, OP.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
14. The Whiteskins.
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 04:19 PM
Oct 2013

Because racism requires power to do harm through discrimination. I don't think white people have anything to fear yet.

BKH70041

(961 posts)
17. If I were a Panther I would complain
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 04:32 PM
Oct 2013

Especially given how crummy Carolina's been playing the last few years.

And the panther on the helmet is black. What's up with that?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which of these names woul...