Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:41 PM Oct 2013

ABC reports officer not shot, no gun found in suspect's car.

Was all the shooting coming from police only?

snip:

A child was found unhurt in the suspect's car, authorities said. The woman was not carrying identification and has not been identified. Police said there were no weapons found in the suspect's car.

snip:

&quot The suspect) circled monuments in front of Capitol Hill twice while being pursued. Then she headed toward the Capitol where Capitol Hill police and Secret Service opened fire and shot her," said Senate Sergeant at Arms Terry Gainer.

snip:

Sources said the woman's vehicle is leased with out of state license plates.

A Capitol Police officer, who was initially reported shot, was later found to have been injured in a traffic accident involving an automated barricade during the pursuit.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attempt-ram-white-house-gate-ends-female-suspect/story?id=20460948

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ABC reports officer not shot, no gun found in suspect's car. (Original Post) Skip Intro Oct 2013 OP
if it is her car, they simply run tags. not a tough one. nt seabeyond Oct 2013 #1
These morons cannot wait until they know the facts. There is a presser in a little more than 1 Mass Oct 2013 #2
What makes you think a "presser" will provide any facts? 1-Old-Man Oct 2013 #51
More than corporate reporters??? Who most often are wrong? Sorry, but this is plain stupid. Mass Oct 2013 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #3
In this case, no ones going to blink twice Drale Oct 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #10
Except for the 2000 lbs of metal with 200 HP she controlled. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Oct 2013 #25
You act like a nut in DC, expect to die. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #16
anywhere Niceguy1 Oct 2013 #48
She was armed with a vehicle maddezmom Oct 2013 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Oct 2013 #27
She rammed the WH gate. They had NO way of knowing she didn't have a bomb and 10 Uzis and 10k rounds kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #18
You are correct. FarPoint Oct 2013 #30
She didn't ram the WH gate Abq_Sarah Oct 2013 #53
Maybe they still consider that a breach maddezmom Oct 2013 #59
She attempted to murder cops by driving her car into theirs, you fool. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #19
Wasn't she armed with a 2 thousand pound machine moving fast? uppityperson Oct 2013 #21
So now we can just shoot all those drivers we see in high speed chases? seveneyes Oct 2013 #38
If they try to run over police, yes nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #47
If they tried to ram into the white house lawn and ran over police, makes sense.Not sure how you got uppityperson Oct 2013 #50
Just bothers me that a non-killing solution was not used seveneyes Oct 2013 #54
It often happens that shooting too soon is employed. I don't know enough in this case either. uppityperson Oct 2013 #55
Not a problem...I was asking for it seveneyes Oct 2013 #64
She rammed the gates of the White House Aerows Oct 2013 #26
She was armed with a 2000+ weapon and already had shown Ranchemp. Oct 2013 #31
WTF? AZ Mike Oct 2013 #33
DAFUQQ? She WAS armed with a 2 tonne battering ram on wheels.... Ecumenist Oct 2013 #43
She refused to leave her car, reversed into a police car, then drove through a group of cops. CJCRANE Oct 2013 #7
Enjoy your short stay at DU. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #11
I don't believe it was the "coppers" that ever said she was armed it was the media maddezmom Oct 2013 #12
It was the "coppers" who said the suspect was unarmed, you moran! n/t ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2013 #28
Strange she has no ID on her person or in the car (if true). n/t Avalux Oct 2013 #4
That stood out to me, too. randome Oct 2013 #56
But I thought it was an attack by an NRA rightwing crazy? davepc Oct 2013 #5
Who said it was an NRA rightwing crazy? MoonRiver Oct 2013 #8
Another DUer: "Thank Tea baggers and NRA Our government is now on lockdown" friendly_iconoclast Oct 2013 #24
Of course crazy FEMALE NRA gunners HockeyMom Oct 2013 #9
You'd need a gun to be a "gunner", no? davepc Oct 2013 #13
And exactly why are you conducting NRA image control? MoonRiver Oct 2013 #15
How is reporting facts doing NRA image control? n/t Skip Intro Oct 2013 #22
Let me put it this way: MoonRiver Oct 2013 #37
And that's how ignorance is perpetuated Dreamer Tatum Oct 2013 #41
Guess we can blame the car and no one will talk about why she did it then The Straight Story Oct 2013 #20
Let's see gollygee Oct 2013 #23
car bombs stillcool Oct 2013 #62
Why does it need to be a 'mass killing'? randome Oct 2013 #63
Well, effective myths work in every situation, don't they? Eleanors38 Oct 2013 #42
Diabetic attack, perhaps? apples and oranges Oct 2013 #29
No. She had full control of the vehicle. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #32
I don't think so. HappyMe Oct 2013 #34
But why did she have a child in the car? apples and oranges Oct 2013 #36
Who the hell knows. HappyMe Oct 2013 #39
Left her house in Connecticut and ended up in DC? frazzled Oct 2013 #35
Reported on channel 4 in DC as well n/t hootinholler Oct 2013 #40
Very sad LittleBlue Oct 2013 #44
Cliff van Zandt said maybe "road rage" - on MSNBC GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2013 #45
All because of wrong turn? Skip Intro Oct 2013 #46
Don't take Cliff too seriously. GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2013 #49
She had no identification in the car (per ABC news). Avalux Oct 2013 #57
A little bit more information maddezmom Oct 2013 #60
Thank you! Avalux Oct 2013 #61
I don't second-guess officers in a tense situation. randome Oct 2013 #58
If someone's charging at police with a knife, they don't shoot them in the big toe. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #65

Mass

(27,315 posts)
2. These morons cannot wait until they know the facts. There is a presser in a little more than 1
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:43 PM
Oct 2013

hour. Why not wait rather than quoting "sources".

I guess John Stewart will have more material for his show.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
51. What makes you think a "presser" will provide any facts?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:42 PM
Oct 2013

There will be a story told at the Presser, but how much of it is factual remains to be seen. If no one other than police were armed and the only person harmed by any means other than being shot was a policeman who ran into a barricade then I'd say that not many facts will be presented - because after all, who will be doing the presentation?

Mass

(27,315 posts)
52. More than corporate reporters??? Who most often are wrong? Sorry, but this is plain stupid.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:47 PM
Oct 2013

The media have been wrong and wrong again. Why should I trust their unconfirmed rumors.

Remember, those are the same reporters spewing GOP talking points. Why would they be more reliable here?

Response to Skip Intro (Original post)

Drale

(7,932 posts)
6. In this case, no ones going to blink twice
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:48 PM
Oct 2013

because she rammed the White House gates and the guards first duty is the protect the President and they can not know her motives or if she may be heavily armed or have a bomb or something else.

Response to Drale (Reply #6)

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #14)

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
16. You act like a nut in DC, expect to die.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:52 PM
Oct 2013

It's simple.

No conspiracy there.

And, I think you mean "excessive."

In this case, deadly force was not "excessive."

Two 's'...

Response to maddezmom (Reply #17)

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
18. She rammed the WH gate. They had NO way of knowing she didn't have a bomb and 10 Uzis and 10k rounds
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:53 PM
Oct 2013

They had every right to act to defend our president, our legislature, and our nation's capitol from apparent hostile action.

Her car is a deadly weapon and she didn't hesitate to use it.

Abq_Sarah

(2,883 posts)
53. She didn't ram the WH gate
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:50 PM
Oct 2013

She hit a barrier in front of the Treasury building... a block away from the White House.

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
59. Maybe they still consider that a breach
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 06:01 PM
Oct 2013

Here is the most recent link from MSNBC

It started at 2:18 p.m. when the woman in a black car tried to breach White House security at 15th St. and E, law-enforcement sources said.


http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/03/20805397-woman-shot-and-killed-by-capitol-police-after-chaotic-chase-from-white-house

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
38. So now we can just shoot all those drivers we see in high speed chases?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:11 PM
Oct 2013

Maybe even shoot them twice if they are driving a four thousand pound machine?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
50. If they tried to ram into the white house lawn and ran over police, makes sense.Not sure how you got
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:42 PM
Oct 2013

from this one case to "all" though. Dichotomous thinking?

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
54. Just bothers me that a non-killing solution was not used
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:54 PM
Oct 2013

I honestly don't know enough about this instance to make a call. And yes, I was being hyperdramatic.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
55. It often happens that shooting too soon is employed. I don't know enough in this case either.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:55 PM
Oct 2013

No problems, sorry for the snark.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
64. Not a problem...I was asking for it
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 06:26 PM
Oct 2013

Sometimes I forget to count to 30 before responding to something I have read. Hell, I poked around reading this place for so long before deciding to stick my nose in, you would think I could at least follow my own preconditions. It was pretty mild snark compared to some I have seen. Thanks again.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
31. She was armed with a 2000+ weapon and already had shown
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:01 PM
Oct 2013

utter disregard for the safety of the officers and civilians alike.
There was no excessive use of force by law enforcement.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
43. DAFUQQ? She WAS armed with a 2 tonne battering ram on wheels....
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:18 PM
Oct 2013

Enjoy your stay..however long it may be!

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
7. She refused to leave her car, reversed into a police car, then drove through a group of cops.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:49 PM
Oct 2013

You can see the footage on CNN.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
56. That stood out to me, too.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:55 PM
Oct 2013

Now there is a suggestion that she had mental health 'issues'.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

davepc

(3,936 posts)
5. But I thought it was an attack by an NRA rightwing crazy?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:45 PM
Oct 2013

I don't like it when facts don't fit into my preconceived world view.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
24. Another DUer: "Thank Tea baggers and NRA Our government is now on lockdown"
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:57 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023776935

apparently because it's fun to blame those we don't like...

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
41. And that's how ignorance is perpetuated
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:16 PM
Oct 2013

Someone points out an inconvenient error, and their motives in pointing out that error are questioned.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
20. Guess we can blame the car and no one will talk about why she did it then
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:54 PM
Oct 2013

Because it is always great to talk about how and not why (no one really cares why).

Even if less than one percent use their cars to harm others we should register them. Oh wait, they already are. That didn't prevent this person. Um...a list of all people we let drive? No...that didn't prevent it either. There has to be a law we can pass to make sure no one ever does this again. Any law passed would make me feel safer at this point (just whatever we do, don't blame that poor lady or look for a cause).

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
23. Let's see
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 04:57 PM
Oct 2013

1. She didn't actually kill anyone. If she'd had a gun, she would have been able to easily kill a great number of people.

2. How common are mass-killings-by-cars?

stillcool

(32,626 posts)
62. car bombs
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 06:09 PM
Oct 2013

are all the rage...but I guess you have to wait for the car to blow up before you attempt to intercept. Maybe next time?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
63. Why does it need to be a 'mass killing'?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 06:16 PM
Oct 2013

She drove erratically, crashed at least twice, so she was a danger to others as well as her child.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
29. Diabetic attack, perhaps?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:00 PM
Oct 2013

She left the house in a panic with her child, but ultimately lost consciousness while on the road?

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
36. But why did she have a child in the car?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:08 PM
Oct 2013

That's the part that makes me question if there's something more to the story. She rammed the gate then freaked when she saw everyone pointing a gun at her. Fight or flight reaction.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
39. Who the hell knows.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:15 PM
Oct 2013

Who knows if it's even her kid? Just because she had a child, that doesn't make her sane or able to care for the kid.
She refused to get out of the car. I don't think this is a case of a bad driver with bad judgement. She had some sort of agenda.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
35. Left her house in Connecticut and ended up in DC?
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:06 PM
Oct 2013

I think we all need to wait to see what really happened. The reports right now, even several hours after, are WILDLY different.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
44. Very sad
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:21 PM
Oct 2013

I sincerely hope that this was not a hypoglycemic incident from a diabetic or mental illness.

Her child in the car with no guns makes me think this may not have been a genuine attempt to cause mayhem.

GreatCaesarsGhost

(8,584 posts)
45. Cliff van Zandt said maybe "road rage" - on MSNBC
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:22 PM
Oct 2013

She made a wrong turn and hit the WH gate and got pissed and took off.

Thanks Cliff.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
57. She had no identification in the car (per ABC news).
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:56 PM
Oct 2013

Isn't that just a little strange Cliff? Out of state license plate, no ID? Tourist who made a wrong turn and went bananas with a child in the car?

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
60. A little bit more information
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 06:05 PM
Oct 2013

A crazed Connecticut woman who tried to ram her way into the White House was shot and killed Thursday after she led police on a high-speed chase through Washington that left one police officer injured.
The woman, a 34-year-old dental hygienist from Stamford who once lived in Brooklyn and who ABC News said has a history of “mental health issues,” had a child in the car with her who was not hurt, officials said.

The drama began around 2:20 p.m., officials said, after the female motorist --- driving a leased black Infiniti – sped into the driveway leading into the White House and tried to breach security at 15th and Pennsylvania Ave., officials said.
Thwarted by the pylons and confronted by cops with their guns drawn, the woman spun the car around and hit the gas – knocking a Secret Service agent over the hood of the car as she sped away.
With Capitol police and Secret Service agents in hot pursuit, the woman raced 12 blocks toward the Capitol, chased at speeds of up to 80 mph at some points.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/shots-fired-u-s-capitol-report-article-1.1475378#ixzz2ghPMOcoF

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
58. I don't second-guess officers in a tense situation.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 05:58 PM
Oct 2013

But I wonder why no one tried to shoot out her tires. I mean the car was stopped and surrounded by about six armed officials. I wish at least one of them had thought about this.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ABC reports officer not s...