Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 10:11 AM Oct 2013

The problem with slaves is that they're too damn expensive.

The price of a good slave in 1855, in today's dollars, would be about $100,000. And then you have to feed them and put up with their illnesses and do something with them when they get too old to work.

Fortunately, American corporations have found the answer. Don't buy the slaves--just lease them for a few bucks an hour & let the Gubmint worry about supplementing their rations. Keep their hours too low for health care, and if they get too sick to work, fire them. Ditto when they get too old to work. It's all so sensible…

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The problem with slaves is that they're too damn expensive. (Original Post) Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 OP
Hippie. Scuba Oct 2013 #1
Hippie? Me? Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #3
The RICH love the underground economy, workers w/o paying social security, worker's comp, min wages Coyotl Oct 2013 #2
And many of these slaves will argue they are not slaves... hunter Oct 2013 #4
The most effctive shackles Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #5
Wage Slavery is the most efficient kind Hydra Oct 2013 #6
Excellent points. Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #7
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2013 #8
brave new world reddread Oct 2013 #9
Michael Moore did a segment on American Apartheid on one of his TV shows el_bryanto Oct 2013 #10
It's not slavery, it's closer to serfdom. JoeyT Oct 2013 #11
Christian Coalition already advocates that ck4829 Oct 2013 #13
You can just hear the tone of regret Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #15
Recommended. H2O Man Oct 2013 #12
That equals good money if your in the markets. raouldukelives Oct 2013 #14
And when you need a war, johnnyreb Oct 2013 #16
A few months ago, a DUer coined the term "free-range slaves" for what you're talking about. July Oct 2013 #17
I just stole that. Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #18
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
2. The RICH love the underground economy, workers w/o paying social security, worker's comp, min wages
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 10:19 AM
Oct 2013

And, at the end of the day, the government foots those bills also to keep retirees out of abject poverty.

hunter

(38,316 posts)
4. And many of these slaves will argue they are not slaves...
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 11:16 AM
Oct 2013

... and will vote against their own best interests in support of those who enslave them.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
6. Wage Slavery is the most efficient kind
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 12:22 PM
Oct 2013

The slaves will fight to work for the illusory chance they have to become a slavemaster. Meanwhile, the Slave Masters can keep all the control they would have had via more subtle means such as propaganda and religion, but they can pick and choose their slaves and dump them when they're done.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
9. brave new world
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 12:40 PM
Oct 2013

I doubt all the outsourcing and free trade agreements in the world will hold a serious candle to what is really destroying jobs-
technology in the service of greed.
We need to plan for the near future in terms of policy and expectations that will serve us all.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
10. Michael Moore did a segment on American Apartheid on one of his TV shows
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 12:42 PM
Oct 2013

I think it was the Awful Truth; in which made this case. Made me really uncomfortable at the time (and still does) but he makes a lot of good points about how we treat poor people in general and minorities in particular in our nation.

Bryant

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
11. It's not slavery, it's closer to serfdom.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 09:17 PM
Oct 2013

You can't sell a serf, but you don't have to buy them either. They're disposable, since they don't represent any initial investment: If they get sick or injured and die, there are plenty more of them. You don't even have to feed them. Serfs are responsible for feeding themselves. If they can't do it because their lord took too much of what they made to enrich themselves, see the line above about there being plenty more.

The goal of deregulation and all the bullshit is serfdom, with the "Job Creators" cast as the nobility. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised to hear someone on Fox haul out "Clearly they're the favored of God, if not they wouldn't have been born rich".

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
13. Christian Coalition already advocates that
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 09:21 AM
Oct 2013

"Of course, slavery was abolished in this country many years ago, so we must apply these principles to the way Americans work today, to employees and employers. Christians have a responsibility to submit to the authority of their employers since they are designated as part of God’s plan for the exercise of authority in the earth by man."

http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2011/08/16/christian-coalition-endorses-slavery/

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
15. You can just hear the tone of regret
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 10:05 AM
Oct 2013

as they lament the end of (one form of) slavery after the Civil War.

H2O Man

(73,558 posts)
12. Recommended.
Thu Oct 3, 2013, 09:20 PM
Oct 2013

The corporations are saving some money by purchasing foreign slaves, rather than the domestic brands.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
14. That equals good money if your in the markets.
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 09:40 AM
Oct 2013

Nothing helps someone sleep so well as the knowledge their money is hard at work for them. Heck, some people make a pretty good living being day slave traders.
Its never too late to help fund a few corporate dreams. Won't you give today?

July

(4,750 posts)
17. A few months ago, a DUer coined the term "free-range slaves" for what you're talking about.
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 10:54 AM
Oct 2013

Unfortunately, I can't remember who it was so I can give him or her credit.

But the point was that corporations want to enjoy the labor of their "slaves" without worrying about food, shelter, medical care or anything else.

I thought it was a clever notion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The problem with slaves i...