Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who do you hope is the first female President? Since Hillary is not available I say Debbie Wasserman (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2012 OP
I really like her too! Never thought though of her as snappyturtle Mar 2012 #1
I think Hilary WILL be available elfin Mar 2012 #2
You would need another WASP like Hillary. I believe Schultz is Jewish. Cleita Mar 2012 #3
Oh, yeah. But V.P.? nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #28
she also doesn't help dems running for positions if they run against repub friends of hers roguevalley Mar 2012 #62
Neither can I. nt Mojorabbit Mar 2012 #63
I thought about this the other day and Michelle Obama crossed my mind aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2012 #4
Elizabeth Herring Warren. n/t louslobbs Mar 2012 #5
Elizabeth Warren surfdog Mar 2012 #6
YES! Nightjock Mar 2012 #22
She's not an experienced politician. Think Rick Perry. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #26
Barack Obama did not have a whole lot of political experience when he ran (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #40
Perry was the longest serving governor in the nation when he ran dsc Mar 2012 #54
She's my choice! MoonRiver Mar 2012 #34
There we go! +1M Zalatix Mar 2012 #55
Elizabeth Warren....Rachel Maddow...with Sandra Fluke in the wings. ; ) blm Mar 2012 #7
Me too. EW definately within the next decade- PotatoChip Mar 2012 #21
Rachel Maddow would probably be the best in any position, President or VP, but Cleita Mar 2012 #69
Wasserman Schultz is great and I love her benddem Mar 2012 #8
I just can't see it... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #9
Why, Mrs. Obama! Class, intellect, ability - my wife and I both think she is just incredible. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2012 #10
She is incredible..... mrmpa Mar 2012 #58
Susan Elizabeth Rice Number23 Mar 2012 #11
Isn't she the best? I love her! CTyankee Mar 2012 #19
No. Not enough charisma. She's more of an intellectual type. Not a nat'l political leader. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #30
She has more charisma, experience and intellectual chops than many of the other options noted here Number23 Mar 2012 #33
I'm just surprised that people don't understand the reality of the Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #36
Susan Rice has been at DoS and is the current US Ambassador to the UN Number23 Mar 2012 #37
Being Jewish should not be a barrier. JDPriestly Mar 2012 #50
Susan Rice is also a great choice! JDPriestly Mar 2012 #49
Wasserman is great. DCBob Mar 2012 #12
Elizabeth Warren she's a wonderful fighter for the middle class and would be wonderful in 2016. ZM90 Mar 2012 #13
Yes, and she is voice in the dark among the male wilderness in Florida! HockeyMom Mar 2012 #14
Elizabeth Warren. BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #15
I'm in Canada so I don't get the whole 'she has jewish heritage so it would be hard' meme. applegrove Mar 2012 #38
Americans are weird about their religion BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #39
Part of it, even from the left, is it indicates she is likely more loyal to Israel. Behind the Aegis Mar 2012 #45
The anti-semitism fad is a big (and very stupid and discriminatory) deal JDPriestly Mar 2012 #52
Kirsten Gillebrand shows a lot of promise. phleshdef Mar 2012 #16
+1000 golddigger Mar 2012 #20
Too lightweight. Chuck Schumer's mini-me (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #41
Yep, she's the one soleft Mar 2012 #68
Wasserman and/or Warren would be great! nt aaaaaa5a Mar 2012 #17
Warren Twenty Sixteen. stlsaxman Mar 2012 #18
She's not an experienced politician. It'll probably come from governors... Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #32
Neither was Obama when he ran (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #42
Warren, of course. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #23
Wasserman/Waren 2016 works for me... Rosco T. Mar 2012 #24
I'd vote for her in a heartbeat. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #25
Caroline Kennedy would be nice. chknltl Mar 2012 #27
She's not a politician. Running for W.H. is only for those who have experience... Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #31
She was a toe-curling embarrassment when she was in the running for Hillary's seat. Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #43
Elizabeth Warren. nt Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #29
The recent Democratic female governors are: Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #35
The current governor of Washington state, Chris Gregoire, JDPriestly Mar 2012 #53
Like Ahnold Gov. Granholm can't run for whistler162 Mar 2012 #72
Another vote for Elizabeth Warren. Brigid Mar 2012 #44
The "Elizabeth Warren 2016" movement started months ago Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #46
Gillibrand - Warren will always be a junior Senator (if that) banned from Kos Mar 2012 #47
I like Elizabeth Warren better, but Debbie Wasserman is not bad. JDPriestly Mar 2012 #48
Susan Rice! lovemydog Mar 2012 #51
She, Obama and Clinton certainly have made an almost flawless team where foreign policy is concerned applegrove Mar 2012 #57
Elizabeth Warren would have a better shot n/t RZM Mar 2012 #56
Jennifer Granholm DonCoquixote Mar 2012 #59
She's not eligible. Behind the Aegis Mar 2012 #60
Canadian Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #65
but she is of Swedish and well Norwegian descent whistler162 Mar 2012 #74
Elizabeth Warren. knixphan Mar 2012 #61
I agree 100% DiverDave Mar 2012 #75
Rachel Maddow hauweg Mar 2012 #64
One of the finest public figures we have. Courtesy Flush Mar 2012 #71
Rachel Dembearpig Mar 2012 #73
Michele Obama B Calm Mar 2012 #66
if Elizabeth Warren can't win in Massachusetts, ecstatic Mar 2012 #67
Barbara Boxer AsahinaKimi Mar 2012 #70
Boxer's not a good campaigner Retrograde Mar 2012 #77
I'd prefer a liberal. Maybe Barbara Boxer, Elizabeth Warren, or Barbara Lee. mmonk Mar 2012 #76
Constance L. Rice Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #78
Katrina vanden Heuvel Shankapotomus Mar 2012 #79
I've always admired this person. Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2012 #84
I like Debbie but I want someone more liberal. For my money E. Warren is where it's at! n/t TeamsterDem Mar 2012 #80
Didn't Wasserman-Schultz support Republicans over Democrats... bvar22 Mar 2012 #81
This is easy, Warren...if she has the passion she would give even Obama a run of the money uponit7771 Mar 2012 #82
I don't think people should be elected or be singled out Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2012 #83

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
1. I really like her too! Never thought though of her as
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:43 PM
Mar 2012

President but now that you've pointed it out, I think she'd be a fine choice.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
2. I think Hilary WILL be available
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:45 PM
Mar 2012

Debbie 'is fantastic, but appeals to a too narrow a base (ie those really paying attention, such as you).

If Warren wins, she is on the fast track for us.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
3. You would need another WASP like Hillary. I believe Schultz is Jewish.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:46 PM
Mar 2012

Also, wouldn't all the Orly Taitz types come crawling out of the woodwork, not only demanding birth certificates, but probably vaginal probes to prove she's a woman?

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
62. she also doesn't help dems running for positions if they run against repub friends of hers
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:24 AM
Mar 2012

I can't forget or forgive that.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
4. I thought about this the other day and Michelle Obama crossed my mind
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:52 PM
Mar 2012

I think she would be terrific: a lawyer like Hillary, extremely well-educated like Hillary, extremely likable and personable, attractive, and charismatic. You will probably say that we don't need dynasties in this country and you're probably right. But that's who I'd most like to see. I like her even more than her husband.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
26. She's not an experienced politician. Think Rick Perry.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:27 PM
Mar 2012

Running for President is only for the creme de la creme of the political world......tried and true NATIONAL politicians.

Hillary did as well as she did because she'd had top level national experience because of her First Lady status in the White House and Governorship of Arkansas.

dsc

(52,165 posts)
54. Perry was the longest serving governor in the nation when he ran
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:02 AM
Mar 2012

he just was an idiot. Warren would be fine in comparison.

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
21. Me too. EW definately within the next decade-
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:55 PM
Mar 2012

is huge on my wishlist.

Up and coming Sandra Fluke, hopefully appointed, or elected to key positions in future years (if of course she is willing) would also be a very great asset, and a potentially wonderful big-time political contender, if she so chooses. Iow, she has 'the right stuff' for high office if she wants to expand upon it.

Love Rachel, and of course would support her, but hat-in-the-ring politics does not appear to be her career bent. Can't read her mind of course, but my guess is that she is currently where she wants to be. Her contributions are already extremely valuable as is.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
69. Rachel Maddow would probably be the best in any position, President or VP, but
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:38 PM
Mar 2012

she's a lesbian and if you think the screams from the right are bad now...I hesitate to think. Look what the wing nuts are trying to do to JCP spokesperson, Ellen DeGeneres. It's not that I mind poking the conservatives with a stick, but Rachel has shown herself to be sensitive about unfounded hatred of her, like the 'she shouldn't have been born' remark by a nasty politician, and I wouldn't want to put her through that wringer.

I believe media persons like herself and Thom Hartmann are best where they are, keeping the public informed of the lies and misinformation from the right. Now Elizabeth Warren has the right background to enter politics and if she gets elected will have the opportunity to learn the ropes.

benddem

(3,172 posts)
8. Wasserman Schultz is great and I love her
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:59 PM
Mar 2012

but she is also Jewish. The first woman and first Jew...I don't think so. Elizabeth Warren a much better choice.

 

JSnuffy

(374 posts)
9. I just can't see it...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:02 PM
Mar 2012

She is not the best spokesman with lots of "uhs" and comes off as very average. Every time I see her it seems like the things she said came straight from a card and not form her own knowledge.

YMMV

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
58. She is incredible.....
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:18 AM
Mar 2012

I was on a conference call with her earlier this week. She was able to inspire me even more. She clicked off what her husband has achieved. She is the strength behind him.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
33. She has more charisma, experience and intellectual chops than many of the other options noted here
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

And since the question was "who do *I* hope to see as the first female president" I'm sticking with my answer. If you have another suggestion, I'm sure the OP would love to hear it.

Edit: Just noticed that all of your responses in this thread are shooting down/disagreeing with everyone's suggestions. No idea why you feel in any way compelled to do that.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
36. I'm just surprised that people don't understand the reality of the
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:45 PM
Mar 2012

kind of person it would take to run for President. Someone without extensive national political exposure and extensive political experience could never run for President. So to name someone without it doesn't make sense.

I'd like to "see" Joy Behar as President, but that's not a sensible answer, now is it, since she's not a politician. The question implies someone who you would REALISTICALLY like to be the first female President. As in, someone who could actually be a contender.

I agreed with the Schultz suggestion more than once, BTW. She is my selection. I forgot she was Jewish, which is a problem. And although she is a state rep, she has had extensive national political exposure. Maybe not enough. But she could realistically be a contender. Most likely would be a V.P. contender, since she's never been a governor or senator, though.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
37. Susan Rice has been at DoS and is the current US Ambassador to the UN
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:59 PM
Mar 2012

She has tons of "extensive national political exposure and extensive political experience."

I am aware of the reality of the kind of person that should run for president just fine, thank you. Which is exactly why I suggested and will continue to suggest Susan Rice.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
50. Being Jewish should not be a barrier.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:51 AM
Mar 2012

A Catholic was elected president. Our Constitution expressly provides that there is to be no religious test for a public office.

It's about time we had a Jewish president. Why not a female one?

I would prefer Elizabeth Warren, and I think she may be well enough known and ready to run in 2016.

Elizabeth Warren has had a lot of national press coverage, and while she did not run for office or serve in public office, she has done a lot of high profile public service and been trusted with great responsibility by Congress and the President.

Elizabeth Warren has the experience, the personality and the political clout to run for any office including that of president. Her handling of Jon Stewart proves it.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
14. Yes, and she is voice in the dark among the male wilderness in Florida!
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:19 PM
Mar 2012

You go, girl! From a woman old enough to be your Grandma.

applegrove

(118,734 posts)
38. I'm in Canada so I don't get the whole 'she has jewish heritage so it would be hard' meme.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 10:44 PM
Mar 2012

Weren't people behind Eliot Spitzer? Are Americans not over that? Hell Lieberman ran for vp and nobody talked about his heritage.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
39. Americans are weird about their religion
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 10:54 PM
Mar 2012

and it needs to be that good old time religion....evangelical christian.

Behind the Aegis

(53,967 posts)
45. Part of it, even from the left, is it indicates she is likely more loyal to Israel.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:29 AM
Mar 2012

And when Lieberman ran, yes they did talk about his being Jewish, and they still do to this day.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
52. The anti-semitism fad is a big (and very stupid and discriminatory) deal
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:56 AM
Mar 2012

among some DUers. It is extremely unfortunate and makes DU look like a bunch of bigots. DU is not just a bunch of bigots, but is pretty representative of the population as a whole.

But then it isn't just the Jewish religion that gets unfair treatment here from time to time. Name a religion and someone will ridicule or criticize it. Good heavens, the atheists get dragged through the mud here too by a lot of DUers.

We all try to be tolerant and fair, but then we all have limitations.

I don't think that a Jewish candidate would have a tough time. Not at all. But then I'm from Los Angeles.

Besides, I thought that Debbie Wasserman-Schulz was somehow hispanic. Stupid me. I always assumed that. Shows you how little I care about people's religions.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
32. She's not an experienced politician. It'll probably come from governors...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:32 PM
Mar 2012

is there a Dem governor out there who looks promising?

Warren will not be able to run for President for many years, while she builds up years of experience on a national level. If she's able to do that while serving on a state level.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
31. She's not a politician. Running for W.H. is only for those who have experience...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:31 PM
Mar 2012

on the national level in the political arena. And lots of it. As we've seen with Rick Perry.

Unless it's a Bill Clinton or someone like that.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
43. She was a toe-curling embarrassment when she was in the running for Hillary's seat.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 11:09 PM
Mar 2012

With her incompetence and lack of interview skills she was the Democratic Sarah Palin.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
35. The recent Democratic female governors are:
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:39 PM
Mar 2012

Jennifer Granholm (First (and only) woman to serve as Governor of Michigan)

Janet Napolitano (First woman to be elected to two terms as Governor of Arizona. Resigned to become Secretary of Homeland Security in the Obama Administration. First woman to immediately succeed another woman as Governor.)

Kathleen Sebelius (Resigned to become Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Obama Administration)

Kathleen Blanco (First (and only) woman to serve as Governor of Louisiana.)

I'm thinking the first female Prez would come from governors. I fear it might be a woman, since it seems like there have been more female Republican governors, and they seem to be stronger (more male-like, which is perceived as being a better leader). Like Jan Brewer of AZ.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
46. The "Elizabeth Warren 2016" movement started months ago
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:35 AM
Mar 2012


Get on board or get out of the way.


I don't think going from DNC chairperson to presidential candidate is a viable path to victory.


 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
47. Gillibrand - Warren will always be a junior Senator (if that)
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:37 AM
Mar 2012

people love KG. Plus she is not a gun nut like Michael Moore.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
48. I like Elizabeth Warren better, but Debbie Wasserman is not bad.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:44 AM
Mar 2012

We can dream, can't we? A female president would be great. It's about time!

applegrove

(118,734 posts)
57. She, Obama and Clinton certainly have made an almost flawless team where foreign policy is concerned
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:14 AM
Mar 2012
 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
74. but she is of Swedish and well Norwegian descent
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:52 PM
Mar 2012

so maybe we can change the Constitution to make that exeption. ;}

ecstatic

(32,720 posts)
67. if Elizabeth Warren can't win in Massachusetts,
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:39 AM
Mar 2012

she can't win the general election. She was my choice but the polls aren't looking too good.

I like Debbie, but I can't picture her running for president. Our best hope is still Clinton,IMO.

Retrograde

(10,142 posts)
77. Boxer's not a good campaigner
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:00 PM
Mar 2012

She keeps her seat because the GOP can't seem to find someone to run against her who appeals to the middle-of-the-road voters (yeah, I'm looking at you, Carly Fiorina and Matt Fong). She's also over 70, and even worse, she's from the ultraliberal (at least that's how we're perceived) Bay Area. And she's Jewish. I like her as my senator, but I think she'd have a hard time in a lot of the country.

A Californian to keep an eye on is [link://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Speier#2008_presidential_campaign|Jackie Speier], who, unfortunately, is not my representative.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
81. Didn't Wasserman-Schultz support Republicans over Democrats...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:37 PM
Mar 2012

...in several Florida House races in 2009?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howie-klein/debbie-wasserman-schultz_b_123322.html

"The problem I have with "Centrists"
is that they agree with Republicans too often."



You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
83. I don't think people should be elected or be singled out
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:58 PM
Mar 2012

for what kind of genitals they were born with or their appearance in general.. ie; colour of skin.

Intelligence, integrity and ideas are what matters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who do you hope is the fi...