'Popular Science' cuts off comments on their site, because of GOPNRAteabaggers.

[onehandle]

Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments

If you carry out those results to their logical end—commenters shape public opinion; public opinion shapes public policy; public policy shapes how and whether and what research gets funded—you start to see why we feel compelled to hit the “off” switch.

A politically motivated, decades-long war on expertise has eroded the popular consensus on a wide variety of scientifically validated topics. Everything, from evolution to the origins of climate change, is mistakenly up for grabs again. Scientific certainty is just another thing for two people to “debate” on television. And because comments sections tend to be a grotesque reflection of the media culture surrounding them, the cynical work of undermining bedrock scientific doctrine is now being done beneath our own stories, within a website devoted to championing science.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments

[Eleanors38]

1. NRA? Where in your posts (and links within) do you get the NRA's involvement?

[onehandle]

2. Stupid and NRAhadists go hand in hand. nt

[Eleanors38]

3. Oh, just another one of your All Roads Lead To The NRA posts.

[onehandle]

4. Sorry if I hurt your feelings.

Rah Rah NRA.

[Eleanors38]

6. You think too highly of your powers. nt

[Electric Monk]

5. You're trying to pretend the NRA doesn't have a long history of being anti-science?

http://www.salon.com/2012/07/25/the_nras_war_on_gun_science/

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2012/12/gun_violence_research_nra_and_congress_blocked_gun_control_studies_at_cdc.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/22/1173117/-The-NRA-s-antiscience-campain

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/08/08/nra-pulled-its-science-denying-website-that-cla/195299

etc.



Next you'll try pretending that they don't astroturf, too