Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jtown1123

(3,203 posts)
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:42 AM Sep 2013

Pew's Plot Against Public Pensions

Wait, Pew is Helping Do What to Public Pensions?


The widely respected Pew Charitable Trusts is engaged in a major ongoing campaign with right-wing Enron billionaire John Arnold to undercut public pensions across the country, writes David Sirota in a report released Thursday for the Institute for America's Future. According to Sirota, Pew positions itself as a nonpartisan organization dedicated to the public interest, but when it comes to pensions, Pew has taken an extreme position and allied itself with conservative activists bent on undoing public pension programs across the country to protect corporate subsidies.

Earlier this year, Pew issued a report that there was a crisis in America's pension system and called for policies to help make up pension fund shortfalls in an effort to shore up the financial future of current workers. But Sirota found that the policies Pew is pursuing--shifting from defined-benefit plans to cash-balance or defined-contribution plans--not only don't shore up the future, they almost universally lead to cuts in pension benefits and more retirees being forced into poverty. The only ones to profit from such moves, he said, are the corporate entities whose subsidies will be saved by cutting pensions.

Defined-benefit plans guarantee retirees a steady income that won't change based on the stock market or a bad economy. Such plans allow workers to accurately budget for retirement so they can live a comfortable lifestyle without fear of falling into poverty or running out of money. In a defined-contribution plan, benefits are variable and can decrease based on the economy or stock market. A bad economy can devastate contributors to such plans, leaving them with little to live on.

Read the rest.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pew's Plot Against Public Pensions (Original Post) jtown1123 Sep 2013 OP
They can't wait to take, take and take by any means possible... Historic NY Sep 2013 #1
Arnold wants to invest pensions into high risk hedge funds. Dawson Leery Sep 2013 #3
They just don't see real people being affected by their greed. It's all numbers on a spreadsheet. Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2013 #2

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
1. They can't wait to take, take and take by any means possible...
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:10 AM
Sep 2013

bait and switch with 401k' that likely will cost more and become risky when they lose. The states that do no allow SS in conjunction with a public pension had done their workers a great injustice. In NY thankfully we have a strong elected comptroller that manages the pensions. NY has recovered its losses relating to investments and is able to offer a discounted contribution schedule for local governments.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
3. Arnold wants to invest pensions into high risk hedge funds.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 08:31 PM
Sep 2013

At least with 401k's, you have control over where the money is invested.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pew's Plot Against Public...