Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:45 PM Mar 2012

When if ever does abortion make you uncomfortable/uneasy?

Thought this would be an interesting topic to bring up considering the current legislative attack that seems to be taking place. This may not be popular, but for me personally, my point is around the 5 month mark. At that point you've got a functioning nervous system, thumb sucking, facial expressions, etc. Before that it's just a group of cells so it doesn't bother me. Just curious about other opinions.

201 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When if ever does abortion make you uncomfortable/uneasy? (Original Post) Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 OP
Never, Its None of My Business we can do it Mar 2012 #1
+1 It is simply none of my concern, nor should it be. hifiguy Mar 2012 #24
I do think about it being a woman. However, I may not want it for me but I don't feel it is my southernyankeebelle Mar 2012 #56
Agreed 100% hifiguy Mar 2012 #61
The OP assumes that it is our business to judge IphengeniaBlumgarten Mar 2012 #34
It's the business of a woman and a coin flip, if she wants! randome Mar 2012 #58
Your so right. Besides who are we to judge another person's decision. We aren't in their shoes. southernyankeebelle Mar 2012 #150
^ Amen ^ Mimosa Mar 2012 #184
I'm with you n/t dana_b Mar 2012 #95
Oh, sheez. closeupready Mar 2012 #113
So, You Think Other People's Personal Decisions Should Somehow Involve You? we can do it Mar 2012 #189
Doesn't matter, if you're a man. randome Mar 2012 #2
So the day before birth would not bother you? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #5
You are kidding... There is not a doctor in this country that would do that! alittlelark Mar 2012 #9
I didn't say there was. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #13
You're kidding, right? Neue Regel Mar 2012 #155
After reading that I assume you understand he was NOT alittlelark Mar 2012 #168
You said, "There is not a doctor in this country that would do that!" Neue Regel Mar 2012 #171
He was as much a doctor as the the Nazi 'doctors'. alittlelark Mar 2012 #177
Back alley abortionist murdering liveborn full term infants? Oh yeah, he's such a good example. uppityperson Mar 2012 #170
He wasn't a "back alley abortionist" Neue Regel Mar 2012 #172
He had been in trouble before and they should have shut him down a long time ago. Since what he was uppityperson Mar 2012 #181
That is absolutely horrifying. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #176
Doesn't matter if it bothers me. randome Mar 2012 #12
That was not the question in the OP though. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #15
It's one of those things that is out of my hands. randome Mar 2012 #19
It's like the wars the US wages in the ME. I can't really make a difference so what is my opinion Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #22
I was thinking of that same metaphor! randome Mar 2012 #36
TBTB mostly control politics and war now. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #38
The difference is: with abortion, you have no RIGHT to "make a difference." NYC Liberal Mar 2012 #138
Sticking my nose in - enlightenment Mar 2012 #97
So your intent is to put us on a slippery slope? One day before birth; then the day before that? Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #158
wtf Dokkie Mar 2012 #76
Same applies for 'getting' a woman pregnant, then. randome Mar 2012 #86
When men try to make the rules Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #3
Hear Hear, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2012 #7
Thank you! Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #11
Abortion is a legal medical procedure obamanut2012 Mar 2012 #4
So all pregnant women are unhealthy? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #6
If You Really Want To Pursue This Line, Sir.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #17
So Sir, you are indeed saying that all pregnant women are unhealthy. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #18
If you are sincerely asking for opinions, why are you then arguing with them? Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #21
I'm trying to get some details into their thought process. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #26
I wish but obviously not. uppityperson Mar 2012 #94
Feel Free To Provide Us All the Amusement at Your Own Expense You Desire, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #25
Please Sir, try to stay on topic. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #28
The Spectacle You Present Is the Sole Point Of Interest, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #44
I'm having some popcorn. I had to duck out to make a call. Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #29
Heading Out Soon For Groceries With the Wife, Ma'am, Myself The Magistrate Mar 2012 #32
It could take five months, too. Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #40
No, he's saying pregnancy poses more risks to a woman's life and health than abortion. smokey nj Mar 2012 #71
he did not say ALL newspeak Mar 2012 #190
"legal medical procedure"s are not always done on unhealthy people. uppityperson Mar 2012 #93
Per the poster: "Abortion is a legal medical procedure for women's health. " nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #115
Doing something to stay healthy does not mean you were unhealthy to start with. uppityperson Mar 2012 #126
Not cleaning your teeth will result in tooth and gum disease. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #129
Nope. uppityperson Mar 2012 #132
Getting a preventative flu or other shot, is a medical procedure, performed on a healthy person Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #156
Always. No one WANTS abortions. The women who have them are not HAPPY about it Vincardog Mar 2012 #8
Not according to some of the other posters. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #10
I have not seen anyone happy about abortions, IF you don't like them Don't have one Vincardog Mar 2012 #16
Isn't "stirring the pot" expected on a political discussion board? Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #141
Discussion implies someone is willing to be persuaded. Stirring the spot implies Vincardog Mar 2012 #153
Please point out where I posted that some did. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #173
Here you go. The post ahead of yours, and your reply "not according to some of the other posters" uppityperson Mar 2012 #182
And I hold to the first part of people wanting them, but not the second part of people being happy. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #183
There you said it. You said "I want them to end pregnancies". Shame on you for wanting ABORTIONS Vincardog Mar 2012 #191
I disagree. No one wants the circumstances that might lead to an abortion. sinkingfeeling Mar 2012 #88
I am taking a similar drug now (Humira) - my dad was on Methotrexate for his arthritis TBF Mar 2012 #101
I did not suggest that you or anyone should have your choices limited. Vincardog Mar 2012 #154
"Fuck rare" is the response of more than one DUer to "safe, legal and rare": Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #139
The problem I have is that "use condoms than have abortions" is wayyyy too simplistic. uppityperson Mar 2012 #147
I'm in favor of better sex education and wider availability of contraception, Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #151
Of course. "rare" is not an objective, measurable number, that is the issue with using it uppityperson Mar 2012 #152
During. eShirl Mar 2012 #14
What Bothers You Is Of No Consequence To Anyone Else, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #20
So you have no opinions on things you cannot affect? Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #31
It Must Keep You Awfully Busy Then, Sir.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #39
I must not be alone, Sir. DU covers a swath of varied topics. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #43
The Strong Are Strongest Alone, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #49
The Bible told Christians to be "wise as serpents." Or "sly as snakes" some might say Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #159
There are couple of things about abortion that can be difficult and sad RZM Mar 2012 #23
Thank you for an honest and thought out reply. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #33
There are women who considered and rejected an abortion and then got a later term one. uppityperson Mar 2012 #96
it makes me uncomfortable LadyHawkAZ Mar 2012 #27
That makes complete sense. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #35
Never. n/t Greybnk48 Mar 2012 #30
When assholes try to outlaw it PlanetBev Mar 2012 #37
+1 eShirl Mar 2012 #42
Sex selective abortions? AngryAmish Mar 2012 #41
This is actually what brought this topic up to some degree. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #45
Then both of you have my best wishes. randome Mar 2012 #51
I'd have a big problem with that AngryAmish Mar 2012 #54
But if both of you can't agree, what then? randome Mar 2012 #60
That is part of the discussion too. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #55
It can't be 50/50, 'cause you can't die or be maimed Lars39 Mar 2012 #77
My wife and I just have that kind of relationship. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #79
Of course it can... JSnuffy Mar 2012 #108
Unfortunately, the DU polling feature isn't currently available. Morning Dew Mar 2012 #66
It doesn't. While you might like to draw a line in the sand and say that once sinkingfeeling Mar 2012 #46
I tend to go along with British law here... LeftishBrit Mar 2012 #47
Seems sensible on the surface. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #50
I love how the British leave religion out of it. Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #143
Truthfully - when it comes to me personally. Been there done that and often feel guilty. But then jwirr Mar 2012 #48
Whenever Republicans make this very same argument. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #52
There is no argument. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #57
You are correct, there is none. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #62
This is what I can't stand about DU. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #63
What I want to open up as a discussion is why you care enough about this to start a thread CTyankee Mar 2012 #64
Word. Me thinks it's to cause infighting. But I'm a little Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #69
Post #45. randome Mar 2012 #73
Rule #1. Get Defensive And Mis-Direct. Awesome. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #67
Might as well shut down DU altogether or maybe make it a rule that we can't discuss things we cannot Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #72
All or none, I see. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #81
I do not believe that was my opinion, but alright. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #116
Yes... of course you may do that. LanternWaste Mar 2012 #122
But I consider most of the pro-abortion remarks to be honest too Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #160
All genuine remarks are interesting. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #175
Women have been under attack for quite a while now me b zola Mar 2012 #187
right up until the age of 41 MattBaggins Mar 2012 #53
ROFL. My parents would have probably agreed. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #59
There is a general level of discomfort The Doctor. Mar 2012 #65
Not sure your opinion is valid. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #75
Lol... got me. n/t The Doctor. Mar 2012 #78
My wife just started watching the new series. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #85
He was brilliant. Mariana Mar 2012 #164
Awesome, I'm glad I'm not alone. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #174
These questions are never really about clinical considerations. EFerrari Mar 2012 #80
I'm quite comfortable with the idea of women being sexually active. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #83
Late term abortions bother me adigal Mar 2012 #68
After 24 weeks ecstatic Mar 2012 #70
Mothers having a late term abortion abelenkpe Mar 2012 #98
I always have a problem with the "so many people would love to adopt" reference. CTyankee Mar 2012 #102
Thank you. +1000. MH1 Mar 2012 #167
In the late 80s I worked with a therapist who had patients who had, as young women, had CTyankee Mar 2012 #188
Do You Know Any Woman Who Chose To Abort After 24 Weeks Just Because? Even Heard Of One? HangOnKids Mar 2012 #121
I simply answered the OP's question ecstatic Mar 2012 #162
Never Dokkie Mar 2012 #74
I've always thought that Roe v Wade got it pretty close to right csziggy Mar 2012 #82
Never, really. It's just not emotionally loaded, and I prefer it that way. saras Mar 2012 #84
When people ask me to qualify my support for choice. Iggo Mar 2012 #87
Never. ieoeja Mar 2012 #89
I had the EXACT Reaction Driving Through Florida On My Way To My Pops Funeral HangOnKids Mar 2012 #100
Because the white race is in trouble because all the white wimmins hedgehog Mar 2012 #179
I respect/trust women to make their own decisions because it's their business, not mine. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #90
If I had to get one..... ingac70 Mar 2012 #91
Always... but it's called "pro-choice" for a reason. SomethingFishy Mar 2012 #92
Never. That is why I have abortion parties regularly. Tupperware? Pshaw. Abortions are more fun! uppityperson Mar 2012 #99
For The Win! HangOnKids Mar 2012 #103
Right after they have their mani-pedis at the spa! CTyankee Mar 2012 #104
It has reached the point where the abortinazis should just be mocked. ieoeja Mar 2012 #106
Don't forget "coat hanger" bingo! The winner gets to pick a standard wire one or one that holds Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #112
when it's illegal. n/t Scout Mar 2012 #105
Last trimester izquierdista Mar 2012 #107
As I read your OP it was obvious pipi_k Mar 2012 #109
You are exaclty right. I'm glad someone actually understood it. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #117
Is it OK to judge people who choose to have 20 children? (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #144
I would never be uncomfortable/uneasy Texasgal Mar 2012 #110
When I wake up and discover I have a uterus and am pregnant, because then it might be my call Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #111
Good On You Warren HangOnKids Mar 2012 #127
I think almost everyone is uncomfortable and uneasy about abortions lunatica Mar 2012 #114
Abortion makes me very uneasy from day one DesertRat Mar 2012 #118
I get uneasy whenever anyone Autumn Mar 2012 #119
WORD! n/t HangOnKids Mar 2012 #131
Valid, peer-reviewed, legal medical procedures do not make me feel uneasy. LanternWaste Mar 2012 #120
In the back alley One_Life_To_Give Mar 2012 #123
when it's MY feet in the stirrups. n/t ladywnch Mar 2012 #124
An early abortion is simply removing a clump of cells. Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #125
I'm in the same camp. I am not lobbying for any change in current laws though. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #128
Me neither (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #135
It *ALWAYS* makes me uncomfortable... tledford Mar 2012 #130
Sex selection abortions bother me, along kelly1mm Mar 2012 #133
Gattaca. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #134
I remember that movie --- king of a high tech Brave New World. That type of kelly1mm Mar 2012 #136
In a sense, nature makes similar decisions; many very deformed embryos abort or expire naturally Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #165
Abortions based on prenatal testing for a disability KamaAina Mar 2012 #137
If a woman chooses to have a baby with Down's syndrome, I respect that choice. Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #142
It doesn't. nt NYC Liberal Mar 2012 #140
Abortion On Demand. Ship of Fools Mar 2012 #145
I do find the Roman Caliphate and the Evangelical opposition Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #146
kick Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #201
Only when asshole men try to keep women from getting them. Avalux Mar 2012 #148
Never. tammywammy Mar 2012 #149
As a recovering Catholic, abortion does bother me. bitchkitty Mar 2012 #157
It's irrelevant etherealtruth Mar 2012 #161
when I actually have a stake in one ibegurpard Mar 2012 #163
It's none of my business. Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #166
It does make just a little bit queasy, I was probably a Jain in a former life.. Pornograph Mar 2012 #169
Personally Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #178
When a woman has an abortion we never really know the reason why, do we? jillan Mar 2012 #180
When it's mine. donheld Mar 2012 #185
When if ever does inserting yourself into women's Dr's offices make you uncomfortable/uneasy? me b zola Mar 2012 #186
When they do the dilation. Feels creepy. elehhhhna Mar 2012 #192
when it is done with a coat hanger varelse Mar 2012 #193
Um, being a guy, I dont have any say at all DiverDave Mar 2012 #194
Never. Abortion is a moral choice that liberates women and protects families. PeaceNikki Mar 2012 #195
For me personally? I would have had a hard time having an abortion, phylny Mar 2012 #196
Emotionally, it is hard. But it is often the Rational choice. Heart AND mind. Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #197
abortion that late is done to save the life of the mother pitohui Mar 2012 #198
I resepct your question, it never has to be black or white. I also respect a womens right to choose uponit7771 Mar 2012 #199
sex selections. however nothing bothers me enough to legislate it La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2012 #200
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
24. +1 It is simply none of my concern, nor should it be.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:59 PM
Mar 2012

The only person in a position to make a decision is the woman who is pregnant.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
56. I do think about it being a woman. However, I may not want it for me but I don't feel it is my
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:14 PM
Mar 2012

place to tell others who are in a different position what to do. I am sure they do not make the decision lightly. I thank god I never had to be in that position. You never know what you will do. But it is up to the woman plain and simple. It is her body.

34. The OP assumes that it is our business to judge
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:03 PM
Mar 2012

It seems to be that abortion should be a private matter involving the woman, her partner, her doctor, and, perhaps, if she wants, her spiritual advisor.

We have gone astray when we think it is the business of legislators or posters to a newsgroup to judge her decision.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
58. It's the business of a woman and a coin flip, if she wants!
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:15 PM
Mar 2012

Regressives often point out how biology has favored men but when it comes to women's biology, we think we should have a say.

Utter nonsense.

Mimosa

(9,131 posts)
184. ^ Amen ^
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:21 AM
Mar 2012

Nobody 'likes' abortion. But there can be many reasons -including a woman's health or some other situation which makes it her only viable option.

I wish more younger women would place healthy children up for adoption rather than aborting the fetuses but it is not my right to decide for other individuals or their families.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. Doesn't matter, if you're a man.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:47 PM
Mar 2012

It's still a woman's body and she should have absolute control over what to do with said body.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
13. I didn't say there was.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:52 PM
Mar 2012

The poster seemed to indicate that there was no point that could be given where they would be uncomfortable.

 

Neue Regel

(221 posts)
155. You're kidding, right?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:13 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20028896-504083.html

Dr. Kermit Gosnell, a Philadelphia doctor, faces eight counts of murder in the deaths of a woman following a botched abortion at his office, along with the deaths of seven babies who, prosecutors allege, were born alive following illegal late-term abortions and were then killed with scissors, reports CBS affiliate KYW.

Gosnell, 69, made millions of dollars over 30 years, performing as many illegal, late-term abortions as he could, prosecutors said. State regulators ignored complaints about him and failed to visit or inspect his clinic since 1993, but no charges were warranted against them, District Attorney Seth Williams said.

Gosnell "induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord," Williams said.

"There were bags and bottles holding aborted fetuses were scattered throughout the building," Williams said. "There were jars, lining shelves, with severed feet that he kept for no medical purpose."

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
168. After reading that I assume you understand he was NOT
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:19 PM
Mar 2012

a doctor in any sense of the word. He was a sociopathic criminal. The article shows him to be a demented man.

 

Neue Regel

(221 posts)
171. You said, "There is not a doctor in this country that would do that!"
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 10:18 PM
Mar 2012

In response to being asked if you were okay with a baby being aborted one day before birth. Clearly there was at least one doctor who was willing to do what you said "no doctor in this country would do."

Kermit Gosnell went to medical school and was licensed by the state of Pennsylvania. He was clearly a doctor. You can't claim he wasn't a "real" doctor just because his actions leave a less-than-favorable impression.

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
177. He was as much a doctor as the the Nazi 'doctors'.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:15 AM
Mar 2012

They were 'real' doctors too. They were also sociopaths.

If that Doctor had chosen another profession he would STILL be a sociopathic serial killer.

You are picking nits.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
170. Back alley abortionist murdering liveborn full term infants? Oh yeah, he's such a good example.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

A good example of what laws are meant to prevent. You did see " illegal" in what you posted, right?

Now, find us a legitimate doctor who would do that legally. I'll wait and check back later to see if you can find one.

 

Neue Regel

(221 posts)
172. He wasn't a "back alley abortionist"
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 10:26 PM
Mar 2012

He operated a clinic in the middle of a neighborhood. You're using the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy. He doesn't fit your idea of a doctor so he's not a "real" doctor. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.

You'd be surprised at how little oversight there actually is. See here, for example:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-01-30-abortion-clinics-oversight_N.htm

Yet Delaware regulators cannot say if Atlantic Women's Medical Center — where Gosnell worked one day a week for a number of years — suffers from similar health and safety deficiencies because abortion providers are not subject to the kind of routine sanitary and safety inspections that restaurants, beauty salons and tattoo parlors get.

Abortion clinics do not fall under the definition of medical facilities in the state that require routine inspections, like free-standing surgery centers, according to the Delaware Division of Public Health.

The state's Division of Professional Regulation, meanwhile, only investigates complaints against doctors, "not facilities," said Division Director James Collins.

Mark A. Meister Sr., executive director of the Medical Society of Delaware, said he did not know of any agency in the state that regulates abortion clinics or similar medical clinic facilities in Delaware, which he conceeded was "hard to believe."

"You are asking an excellent question," he said. "The answer may be at this point in time there is no regulatory authority over a clinic or organization like that."

More at the link

But go ahead, keep on believing that abortion clinics are held to a high standard of safety, cleanliness, and ethical behavior. Pennsylvania didn't inspect any abortion clinics for 15 years because it was too politically sensitive a topic.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
181. He had been in trouble before and they should have shut him down a long time ago. Since what he was
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:50 AM
Mar 2012

doing was highly illegal, as well as unhygienic and dangerous, he was a back alley abortionist. You do understand that term does not mean people doing illegal abortions only in back alleys, right?

Is this conversation about what is legal or what is illegal, since you bring up those breaking the law?

I never said he is not a "real" doctor. I said he is a back alley abortionist. Doing unhygienic, illegal abortions, hiding what he did, charging a shitload. Yes, is he is a "real" doctor, also a murderer.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. It's one of those things that is out of my hands.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:57 PM
Mar 2012

So my feelings on the matter, as much as they might be taken into account, do not REQUIRE being taken into account since it's not my body that is involved.

The very first point should be made that a woman can do whatever she wants to do with her own body as regards pregnancy. After that is settled, then we can talk about men's feelings. Until then, no, there is no point at which I would feel uncomfortable with a woman making a decision about her own body.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
22. It's like the wars the US wages in the ME. I can't really make a difference so what is my opinion
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:58 PM
Mar 2012

worth really? Nothing.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
36. I was thinking of that same metaphor!
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:03 PM
Mar 2012

But it doesn't quite hold up. You CAN do something to influence politics and wars. And you CAN try to influence what a woman decides to do with her body.

But any conversation that approaches that subject should start from, at a minimum, the absolute bedrock principle that it is always a woman's final decision and no one else's.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
38. TBTB mostly control politics and war now.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:04 PM
Mar 2012

Not sure how much if any influence we have over those anymore.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
138. The difference is: with abortion, you have no RIGHT to "make a difference."
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:58 PM
Mar 2012

With wars, you do have that right.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
158. So your intent is to put us on a slippery slope? One day before birth; then the day before that?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:21 PM
Mar 2012

And then the next second, we're good Catholics? Condemning any abortion after the day of conception?

Much of the original law allowing abortion set a limit: beginning of 3rd trimester. Seems reasonable.

 

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)
76. wtf
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:35 PM
Mar 2012

I will only accept that statement if women also took full control of the child when its born. You cannot eat your cake and have it.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
86. Same applies for 'getting' a woman pregnant, then.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:41 PM
Mar 2012

If a man impregnates a woman, he is taking that risk. If he doesn't want a child, he should make damned sure he doesn't get her pregnant.

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
17. If You Really Want To Pursue This Line, Sir....
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:53 PM
Mar 2012

Pregnancy and childbirth have a much higher rate of mortality and adverse health consequences than either abortion or not being pregnant do.

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
21. If you are sincerely asking for opinions, why are you then arguing with them?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:58 PM
Mar 2012

After all, we are all pro choice here, aren't we?

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
26. I'm trying to get some details into their thought process.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:00 PM
Mar 2012

I've explained why I make my distinctions. I find it hard to believe that people are completely blase up until birth, but I could be wrong.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
190. he did not say ALL
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:02 PM
Mar 2012

the argument was established in sweden when abortion came into law. The percentage of women mortality during pregnancy. Also women mortality because of illegal abortions. The younger the female, the higher mortality rate. Also, if a woman is in her late thirties, forties-higher percentage of complications.

We had a case in california, I believe it was in the early nineties. A woman who was pregnant was in an accident. The doctor informed her family that she would have a better chance of surviving if she aborted. The family agreed. But, an anti-abortion male lawyer stopped the procedure just long enough that the woman and fetus were dead.

It is not the government's place to decide-it is the woman's, her doctor, her family's-but not the government.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
126. Doing something to stay healthy does not mean you were unhealthy to start with.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:25 PM
Mar 2012

Teeth cleaning is a legal dental procedure for the patient's health. Does this mean that someone who gets their teeth cleaned is unhealthy?

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
129. Not cleaning your teeth will result in tooth and gum disease.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:31 PM
Mar 2012

There may be complications with pregnancy and it may go very smoothly.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
132. Nope.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:40 PM
Mar 2012

Not cleaning your teeth may result in tooth and gum disease. Not getting an abortion may result in physical and/or emotional dis-ease.

Either way, doing something to remain healthy does not mean you were unhealthy to start with.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
156. Getting a preventative flu or other shot, is a medical procedure, performed on a healthy person
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:14 PM
Mar 2012

Many medical/health procedures are performed on healthy persons

It is not necessary to be sick, to benefit from many common medical/health procedures

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
8. Always. No one WANTS abortions. The women who have them are not HAPPY about it
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:50 PM
Mar 2012

they are a sad thing that should be MINIMIZED.
That is why all rational people support sex education and responsible birth (and disease) control.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
10. Not according to some of the other posters.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:51 PM
Mar 2012

I admit that I am not always bothered by it. Early on it is not much more than a collection of cells.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
16. I have not seen anyone happy about abortions, IF you don't like them Don't have one
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:53 PM
Mar 2012

What is your purpose stirring this pot?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
141. Isn't "stirring the pot" expected on a political discussion board?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:01 PM
Mar 2012

Or should we only discuss issues that we all agree on?

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
153. Discussion implies someone is willing to be persuaded. Stirring the spot implies
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:38 PM
Mar 2012

someone is shit disturbing.
Example when I posted that NO ONE wanted abortions to happen; the OP answered that some did.

That is a lie in my opinion and is an example of stirring the pot with the objective is disrupting and creating shit.
Notice the way the topic of sex education and contraception for the purpose of MINIMIZING the unfortunate cases of abortion is ignored.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
182. Here you go. The post ahead of yours, and your reply "not according to some of the other posters"
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:57 AM
Mar 2012

Vincardog
8. Always. No one WANTS abortions. The women who have them are not HAPPY about it

they are a sad thing that should be MINIMIZED.
That is why all rational people support sex education and responsible birth (and disease) control.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=373829
Not according to some of the other posters.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
183. And I hold to the first part of people wanting them, but not the second part of people being happy.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:16 AM
Mar 2012

Heck, I want them to end pregnancies early on. They are an important contraceptive tool. I may be uncomfortable with it in the later months, but that is just my opinion.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
191. There you said it. You said "I want them to end pregnancies". Shame on you for wanting ABORTIONS
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:46 PM
Mar 2012

I want all unwanted pregnancies to be avoided thru proper use of birth control.
but that is just my opinion.
WTF is up with that?

sinkingfeeling

(51,469 posts)
88. I disagree. No one wants the circumstances that might lead to an abortion.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:43 PM
Mar 2012

Long ago, my birth control failed while I was taking the drug methotrexate (yes the same one in the news, used to treat cancers). Look up the side effects of becoming pregnant while on the drug. I elected to have an abortion. I have absolutely zero regrets about that decision. Never had any regrets. Yes, it was a sad and painful experience that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy, but necessary.

TBF

(32,083 posts)
101. I am taking a similar drug now (Humira) - my dad was on Methotrexate for his arthritis
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:08 PM
Mar 2012

back when it was experimental (in the 80s) at least for this disease. I was cautioned before I went on Humira, as he was with Methotrexate, that getting pregnant while on the drug would be highly inadvisable. I am in my 40s and have been blessed with two children so the decision was easy for me - I take birth control now. Thank heaven it exists and I have access to it.

After seeing a sonogram of my son at about 3 months (maybe a little earlier - date uncertain), it would be very difficult to have the procedure. But it should be every woman's choice and I stand with the folks who are pro-choice and advocating birth control.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
154. I did not suggest that you or anyone should have your choices limited.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:55 PM
Mar 2012

My point was that in every case I am aware of Abortion was a choice that women made as the "best" of poor options.
That is what I meant by "no one WANTS an abortion.
The OP is implying that you or others purposefully created the conditions SO you could have an abortion.
As if the abortion in and of itself was a desirable thing rather than a sad necessity.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
139. "Fuck rare" is the response of more than one DUer to "safe, legal and rare":
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:00 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=272318

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=276069

In the thread in which these posts appear I was expressing my wish that contraception would be so widely available, and widely used, along with sex education, that unwanted pregnancies would be rare, so abortions would be rare. In other words, I would prefer people to use condoms than have abortions.

And I am still baffled that DUers would take exception to this.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
147. The problem I have is that "use condoms than have abortions" is wayyyy too simplistic.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:44 PM
Mar 2012

Abortions need to be as rare as they are needed. Like cholecystectomies. As they are needed, they should be done. Legally. Hygienically.

The "use condoms than have abortions" statement seems to indicate that a majority of women who have abortions decided simply to not use condoms, would prefer having an abortion than using a condom.

Yes, there are those who get pregnant because they don't use contraception, but "use a condom rather than have an abortion" is condescending.

And "rare" is too vague a term, too subjective. Abortions should be available as needed, safe, legal, hygienic.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
151. I'm in favor of better sex education and wider availability of contraception,
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 07:08 PM
Mar 2012

and especially programs that distribute condoms for free.

I am in favor of this because it will lead to fewer unwanted pregnancies and a reduction in STDs.

This point of view really should not be controversial.

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
20. What Bothers You Is Of No Consequence To Anyone Else, Sir
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:57 PM
Mar 2012

No one needs to pay the slightest bit of attention, let alone deference to it. It is the one thing you may be sure no one facing a choice in this matter will be concerned with in the slightest.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
31. So you have no opinions on things you cannot affect?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:02 PM
Mar 2012

I have opinions on all things in the heavens and on Earth.

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
39. It Must Keep You Awfully Busy Then, Sir....
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:05 PM
Mar 2012

How it leaves you time to trot out tired old wheezes like this is a wonderment....

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
49. The Strong Are Strongest Alone, Sir
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:10 PM
Mar 2012

"Children make the best opponents at scrabble, as they are both easy to beat and fun to cheat."

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
159. The Bible told Christians to be "wise as serpents." Or "sly as snakes" some might say
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:31 PM
Mar 2012

So you, "snake," are a Christian? Snaking surreptiously into DU with allegedly high moral purpose?

Personally, I've always been troubled however by that biblical command: to be sly as a snake. That always seemed to conflict with the rest of the Bible. That pictured snakes as being from the devil himself.

Any quick thoughts, in passing, on this curious subject? Without going too far afield or off topic?

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
23. There are couple of things about abortion that can be difficult and sad
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 02:59 PM
Mar 2012

One is the notion of regret, meaning women who have one and then later wish they hadn't. I think that comparatively few women who considered abortion and then rejected the idea would say years later that they wished they had aborted their child (though I'm sure there are a few). But I have known people who had abortions in their teenage years and then regretted that decision. One woman I met about 10 years after her abortion. When we talked about it, I could tell that she really wished she hadn't done it. She really wasn't over it and it caused her a lot of pain and sadness. I thought that was unfortunate.

Another difficult scenario is when the prospective parents disagree about whether or not an abortion should be performed. I do feel sympathy for men who wish to have a child but are overruled by their partner's desire for an abortion. Obviously in such situations the decision must rest with the woman alone, but I imagine it would be very difficult for a man who wants to be a father to be powerless in that situation. It should be a woman's choice but I disagree with any argument that would tell a man in such situation to sit down, shut up, and take it without complaining. The emotional pain in such a situation would be very difficult, but unfortunately, there's no real way around it. That's why partners must discuss this thing ahead of time and come to an understanding before a child is conceived.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
96. There are women who considered and rejected an abortion and then got a later term one.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:54 PM
Mar 2012

I've a friend who did this. She was going to get one at 8 weeks and ran into the local anti-choicers. She canceled her appointment and ended up getting one several weeks later. She said she realized that it was the best decision for her and really resented those who emotionally manipulated her into putting it off as the later term one was much more difficult all the way around.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
27. it makes me uncomfortable
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:00 PM
Mar 2012

when I'm standing at a clinic, nose to nose with a pack of rabid nutjobs waving signs and leaking hatred and pious insanity from the eyes, and I'm wondering which one(s) has the gun.

PlanetBev

(4,104 posts)
37. When assholes try to outlaw it
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:04 PM
Mar 2012

When women die from botched, illegal procedures brought about by holier than thou polititians and bible-beaters.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
41. Sex selective abortions?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:06 PM
Mar 2012

In general I am uncomfortable that so many fetus' with Down's Syndrome are aborted. The people I know with Down's are very happy and seem to enjoy being alive.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
45. This is actually what brought this topic up to some degree.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:08 PM
Mar 2012

My wife and I are discussing what we would do if the amnio shows something.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
51. Then both of you have my best wishes.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:11 PM
Mar 2012

But what happens if you disagree on what to do? From my point of view, your wife has veto power over your wishes and, in my humble opinion, you should accept that.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
54. I'd have a big problem with that
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:13 PM
Mar 2012

My wife and I make our decisions together. That is kinda the point of being married.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
60. But if both of you can't agree, what then?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:17 PM
Mar 2012

There is nothing wrong with discussion and trying to come to a decision together. But in the event of a tie, it's the woman's call, in my book.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
55. That is part of the discussion too.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:13 PM
Mar 2012

We have pretty much agreed that it is 50/50 and if we disagree then we will both plead our cases and see what happens. Usually there are points that one has considered and the other has not.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
79. My wife and I just have that kind of relationship.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:36 PM
Mar 2012

We always find a way to come to a mutual decision. Tough to explain.

She's a mentalist though (therapist) so she may just be using some mentalism on me.

Morning Dew

(6,539 posts)
66. Unfortunately, the DU polling feature isn't currently available.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:26 PM
Mar 2012

That's how I'd go about my family planning decisions.

sinkingfeeling

(51,469 posts)
46. It doesn't. While you might like to draw a line in the sand and say that once
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:08 PM
Mar 2012

there is a face or thumb sucking or something, that really doesn't apply in the decision making process that women (and women alone) go through. What counts beyond the first trimester, is what the pregnancy is doing to the woman's body or the health/ future wellbeing of the fetus and the mother. Decisions on whether or not to end the pregnancy are private.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
47. I tend to go along with British law here...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:08 PM
Mar 2012

I think that, except for exceptional circumstances (severe threat to mother's life or health; baby would be born with terminal illness such as Tay-Sachs, etc.; late-reported incest or rape), abortions should not be performed after 24 weeks, when foetuses may become viable outside the womb. However, this is almost irrelevant, as hardly any abortions ARE performed after 24 weeks, or even after 20 weeks, except under such exceptional circumstances.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
48. Truthfully - when it comes to me personally. Been there done that and often feel guilty. But then
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:09 PM
Mar 2012

I am older and that may explain it.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
63. This is what I can't stand about DU.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:20 PM
Mar 2012

You can't try to open up a discussion about complicated topics and feelings without getting accused of something. Some people have made some very honest answers like sex selection and down's syndrome, but they are far and few in-between.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
64. What I want to open up as a discussion is why you care enough about this to start a thread
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:25 PM
Mar 2012

on it? You want very honest answers and so do I.

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
69. Word. Me thinks it's to cause infighting. But I'm a little
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:29 PM
Mar 2012

sensitive these days considering war is being waged on women.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
67. Rule #1. Get Defensive And Mis-Direct. Awesome.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:27 PM
Mar 2012

Anyone's opinion of the matter of abortion, if and when they feel uncomfortable is of no matter to anyone for any reason other than the person directly affected.


At what level do you get uncomfortable about sexually abusing children?

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
72. Might as well shut down DU altogether or maybe make it a rule that we can't discuss things we cannot
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:31 PM
Mar 2012

affect.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
81. All or none, I see.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:37 PM
Mar 2012

When you get an reply that you dislike, annihilate everything.

No, you are garnering some responses in this thread questioning your real intent, and you don't seem to care for that turn of events.

It happens here all the time, get used to it.


That, too, is part of DU whether you like it or not.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
122. Yes... of course you may do that.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:15 PM
Mar 2012

"You can't try to open up a discussion about complicated topics and feelings without getting accused of something..."

Yes... of course you may do that. It simply needs to predicated on sincerity rather than on the obvious and the disingenuous...

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
160. But I consider most of the pro-abortion remarks to be honest too
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:36 PM
Mar 2012

Are only anti-abortion remarks honest in your opinion?

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
187. Women have been under attack for quite a while now
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:33 AM
Mar 2012

And if you don't mind most of us are fed-up with strangers inserting themselves into the most private areas of our lives. The constant demand that complete strangers have the right to make decisions for us isn't just maddening, its also alarming.

I know you say that this is about a decsion that you and your wife may have to make, but we are very used to those that are hostile to women approaching a subject in just the same manner that you have.

If you need the counsel of friends, please seek them out.

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
65. There is a general level of discomfort
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:25 PM
Mar 2012

among doctors who do tend to also draw that line. But it's not a line drawn in stone.

Most OB/GYNs do not like the idea of performing an abortion after 24 weeks for many reasons, and many will refuse. There are some that do not refuse, but in most cases, a doctor will try to find out what the reason for the request is and do their best to inform the patient of any possible side-effects. They may even attempt to dissuade the patient either out of 'discomfort' or simple concern for the patient herself. As doctors have a duty to mitigate harm, the notion of aborting a viable fetus can be uncomfortable.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
75. Not sure your opinion is valid.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:34 PM
Mar 2012

Considering your ability to regenerate .

Great post in all seriousness though.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
85. My wife just started watching the new series.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:41 PM
Mar 2012

I had forgotten how much I liked Chris Eccleston as The Doctor. Probably in the minority on that one.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
80. These questions are never really about clinical considerations.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:37 PM
Mar 2012

They are about controlling women.

The subtext is, how uncomfortable does the idea of sexually active women make you?

Abortions make me uncomfortable when they are not safe, legal and accessible. Any other consideration is not about abortion but about social control of women's agency.

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
83. I'm quite comfortable with the idea of women being sexually active.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:39 PM
Mar 2012

In fact I think they should be moreso.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
68. Late term abortions bother me
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:28 PM
Mar 2012

I cannot think of any reason to abort, rather than have a birth, labor can be induced with pitocin.

ecstatic

(32,720 posts)
70. After 24 weeks
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:31 PM
Mar 2012

Many babies can survive in the NICU at that point, and so many people would love to adopt. I think abortions should be done early on, but I don't plan to force my view on anyone else.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
98. Mothers having a late term abortion
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:55 PM
Mar 2012

do so because it is either a health risk to the mother, to a twin who is developing normally when one is not (to save the one developing normally) or because the baby has no chance of surviving outside the womb. It's not an easy procedure to arrange and to heap guilt on mothers who in almost every case wanted the child but had legitimate health reasons to go that route is sad.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
102. I always have a problem with the "so many people would love to adopt" reference.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:08 PM
Mar 2012

This often gets tossed around as a reason why a woman with an unwanted pregnancy "should" carry to term and give birth. It strikes me as regarding women as nothing more than "brood mares." If a woman who has an unwanted pregnancy wishes to give birth and give the child up for adoption, that is her decision. But to withhold her right to choose a termination on the grounds that some other woman can't conceive and wants to adopt is obnoxious.

MH1

(17,600 posts)
167. Thank you. +1000.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:13 PM
Mar 2012

There are other factors, too. The child WILL want to contact their biological mother at some point. Giving birth entails a lifetime connection that might not be wanted.

That said, I want contraception widely available and widely used so that abortions are rarely needed; and for abortion to be widely and easily accessible in the earliest stage of pregnancy, so 'late-term abortion' will be a consideration that doesn't even have to be made except for late-term complications and other extremely rare situations. Not because I have a problem with abortion (I don't) but because some people do, and thus make it difficult for the person having an abortion.

Ironically (and I think intentionally by some), the efforts to suppress contraception and access to abortion, make late(r)-term abortions more likely in more cases.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
188. In the late 80s I worked with a therapist who had patients who had, as young women, had
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 10:56 AM
Mar 2012

had a pregnancy and were unmarried and they brought the pregnancy to term and gave up the baby for adoption. This therapist said these women struggled all their lives with that decision and even remembered the child when every birthday rolled around. They were miserable over the experience of going through a pregnancy and given birth, only to have the baby taken away in the hospital, some times sight unseen by the birth mother.

The right to lifers never talk about these women and the suffering they went through when they went through their traumas.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
121. Do You Know Any Woman Who Chose To Abort After 24 Weeks Just Because? Even Heard Of One?
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:14 PM
Mar 2012

I have four sisters and lots of girl friends and I have NEVER heard of anyone who elected to abort after 24 weeks unless the life of the mother was at stake. I mean really, have you ever been pregnant? 24 weeks is the 6 month mark, a pregnancy is 280 days or 10 lunar months, who carries a fetus 24 weeks and then just decides to abort? I've never heard of anyone doing that, the late term abortion myth by choice is just that, a MYTH.

ecstatic

(32,720 posts)
162. I simply answered the OP's question
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:39 PM
Mar 2012

didn't say how often it happens, etc., and most importantly, I said it was MY opinion--not something I would hold anyone else to.

 

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)
74. Never
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:33 PM
Mar 2012

I rather see a kid get aborted that have him/her grow up with a parent that doesnt want him/her. Life is hard enough as it is, lets not make it anymore more complicated by prevent women from using abortion.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
82. I've always thought that Roe v Wade got it pretty close to right
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:37 PM
Mar 2012

The first trimester, it's up to the woman, second is a little more problematic but should be determined by the status of the fetus and the health of the mother, third trimester if medically indicated. Since it has been forty years, maybe the medical information about viability and medical necessity have changed but from what I know, the general time frame has not.

But no matter WHEN during the pregnancy and abortion might be considered it should ALWAYS be a decision made between a woman and her doctor without government interference.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
84. Never, really. It's just not emotionally loaded, and I prefer it that way.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:39 PM
Mar 2012

First, it's not my business unless it's my body.
Second, it's something that happens in context. Middle-class America isn't anywhere near my standards of good or normal. So everything there is a horrible compromise at best. We live in a world where nearly everything about consumer capitalism appears bizarrely corrupt, dysfunctional, and insane to me, so it's always necessary for me to think my way though these things. American cliche emotions don't work for me - the entire set of pre-neocon European attitudes towards sex seem hugely more grounded and sensible, although they are getting beaten down by corporatism too. So the entire issue appears, to me, utterly manufactured by the neocons, starting in the early seventies in rejection of feminism, civil rights, sexual liberation, and personal liberty, among other things.

For example, I don't buy the argument that infanticide coarsens people, unless it's something you're doing on the side, in a culture that disapproves of it in practice as well as in talk, for fun. In the real world, the fact that it's happening indicates that culturally, people are already at that level, and it's the CAUSES of that that need to change. In that world, it's incredibly UNlikely that being "more moral" about infanticide will change the rest of society in the necessary direction.

Or in blunter language, if you live somewhere that people all around you are so desperate that they have to kill babies, and killing infants seems normal, NOT killing the babies is not going to help your odds of survival. It's a good result to desire, but creating an individual example of the result exerts no force back on the governing situation.

If you live somewhere that you need abortions, whether because of ignorant sex, coerced sex, failure of birth control, or some other reason, NOT having that abortion is not going to change the causes of your ignorance, the forces that coerced you, the quality of birth control available, or in most cases, whatever else it was that motivated you. If you want to get rid of abortions, make them unnecessary without judging what people do to make them unnecessary.

The dominionist belief, on the other hand, is that the problem is original sin on the part of the woman, and the appropriate interim action until the Second Coming is that men control the women and the women suffer, both as God commands. They assert that having, and raising, the baby is deserved punishment. More liberal fundies believe that the problem is ignorance on the part of the woman, and that the experience of having and raising the baby will somehow be educational for the mother. Note that the fate of the baby is not a significant concern in either position. Original sin and all that.

Iggo

(47,561 posts)
87. When people ask me to qualify my support for choice.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:43 PM
Mar 2012

Almost always, they're looking for something to attack.

And so no, I'm not going there.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
89. Never.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:45 PM
Mar 2012

Took a drive through bible belt country last weekend. Saw an anti-abortion sign every two or three miles. By the twentieth or so I blurted out, "Jesus Fucking Christ what is wrong with these sick fuckers and their obsession with abortion?!?"

The 15 year old next to me, and with whom I almost never talk politics, replied, "I was thinking the same thing. This is just weird."

And it is. Where does this shit come from? They are absolutely obsessed with abortion. They seem to drink, eat and breathe abortion. They must spend every waking moment thinking about abortion. And probably dreaming of abortions all night.

I grew up in that part of the country in the '60s and '70s. There was *none* of this back then. Seriously. Where does this weird ass shit come from?


 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
100. I had the EXACT Reaction Driving Through Florida On My Way To My Pops Funeral
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:03 PM
Mar 2012

Where this weird ass shit comes from mystifies me. I wanted to shoot everyone of those fucking billboards.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
179. Because the white race is in trouble because all the white wimmins
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:26 AM
Mar 2012

is getting abortions instead of having babies!

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
92. Always... but it's called "pro-choice" for a reason.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:49 PM
Mar 2012

Abortions should be safe, legal and RARE. Birth control should be free and available. Whatever my personal feelings are on the issue don't matter, what matters is I have no right to make decisions for someone else.

And anyone who thinks "abstinence education" works is an idiot. Sex is one of the great joys in life. If "God" didn't want me having sex all the time he would have made it feel miserable.


uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
99. Never. That is why I have abortion parties regularly. Tupperware? Pshaw. Abortions are more fun!
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 03:59 PM
Mar 2012

The games you can play while you wait your turn, the treats you can make, all are wonderful fun! Jello jigglers in the shape of fetuses. Spaghetti with placenta shaped meatballs. Pin the penis on the random stranger. Musical wombs. What fun!

My friends so look forward to these parties that they go have unprotected sex with random strangers hoping to be able to participate!

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
104. Right after they have their mani-pedis at the spa!
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:10 PM
Mar 2012

And lunch at the club, of course, with the other "girls."

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
106. It has reached the point where the abortinazis should just be mocked.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:18 PM
Mar 2012

Their obsession with this issue is turning them into a parody of themselves.

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
112. Don't forget "coat hanger" bingo! The winner gets to pick a standard wire one or one that holds
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:58 PM
Mar 2012

Pants, too!

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
107. Last trimester
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:36 PM
Mar 2012

For an uncomplicated pregnancy. If you have a woman who is 6 months along and healthy, her inquiring about an abortion could signal something else going wrong: abusive or recently absconded spouse, depression, economic problems, stress, etc.

Of course, Republicans aren't going to ante up one thin dime to address these other possible problems, they "just say NO!"

While she is the ultimate 'decider', there should be enough of a safety net so that she can be sure that life is not going to get a lot worse for her if she carries to term.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
109. As I read your OP it was obvious
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:47 PM
Mar 2012

that some people don't truly understand that it's entirely possible to be uneasy (or squeamish) about something and...at the same time hold absolutely NO judgement toward others for whatever they do.

The whole idea of abortion does make me uneasy. I almost had one back in 1974, but could not go through with it.

HOWEVER...

and this is the important part...

that does not mean I have the right to tell someone else what she can or cannot do.

Too many people live in a black/white...either/or world and don't know that it's possible to have very mixed feelings about a lot of issues.

So the bottom line here is...

I could not do it. Other women should be free to do what I could not.

And I would never judge them.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
111. When I wake up and discover I have a uterus and am pregnant, because then it might be my call
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:57 PM
Mar 2012

other than that, I will defer to the woman in whom the pregnancy is taking place. Every time.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
114. I think almost everyone is uncomfortable and uneasy about abortions
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:00 PM
Mar 2012

It's not a fucking picnic for anyone.

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
118. Abortion makes me very uneasy from day one
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:07 PM
Mar 2012

But that's FOR ME. That's what being pro-choice is all about. It's about a woman's personal choice and it's no one else's business.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
119. I get uneasy whenever anyone
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:10 PM
Mar 2012

decides that they need to decide what a woman does with her body. It's very easy to solve this problem, if you don't want an abortion or don't believe they should be done, don't have one. But no one has a right to tell any woman that she can't have one if she wants or needs one.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
120. Valid, peer-reviewed, legal medical procedures do not make me feel uneasy.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:11 PM
Mar 2012

Valid, peer-reviewed, legal medical procedures which someone else may engage of their own accord do not make me feel uneasy as long as the doctor is competent.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
123. In the back alley
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:19 PM
Mar 2012

or when a young girl begs her boyfriend to beat her with a bat hoping to induce one.

And whenever women feel they must use it to please their boyfriends who can't be bothered to use condoms.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
125. An early abortion is simply removing a clump of cells.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:24 PM
Mar 2012

No more of an issue than cutting ones toenails.

A late abortion, on the other hand, is ending a human life. A very different proposition, and a much bigger deal, even when there is a very good reason for carrying it out. I don't think anyone can be completely indifferent to ending a human life, even when it is done for the best of reasons.

tledford

(917 posts)
130. It *ALWAYS* makes me uncomfortable...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:32 PM
Mar 2012

...but it's none of my FUCKING BUSINESS as I'm not the pregnant woman!

Sheesh!

kelly1mm

(4,734 posts)
133. Sex selection abortions bother me, along
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:40 PM
Mar 2012

with any genetic selection based abortions. I could see the day if/when the genetic markers for sexual orientation are identifible, and some people wishing to terminate LGTG pregnancies. Those things do bother me.

kelly1mm

(4,734 posts)
136. I remember that movie --- king of a high tech Brave New World. That type of
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:55 PM
Mar 2012

genetic manipulation bothers me.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
137. Abortions based on prenatal testing for a disability
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 05:57 PM
Mar 2012

often Down syndrome.

The basic problem is that the counseling* women recieve after such a test result is all about how miserable and horrible life with a Down's child is, giving them a hard nudge in the direction of choosing abortion.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
142. If a woman chooses to have a baby with Down's syndrome, I respect that choice.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:03 PM
Mar 2012

But I also respect her choice if she chooses to terminate the pregnancy.

Ship of Fools

(1,453 posts)
145. Abortion On Demand.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:31 PM
Mar 2012

No Exceptions, No Apologies.

I had an abortion at 23 weeks. Had I not had the abortion, I would
be dead.

Thank you for your concern.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
146. I do find the Roman Caliphate and the Evangelical opposition
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:44 PM
Mar 2012

to abortion due to rape to be outright disgusting.

My mother does not like the idea of abortion, though she understands why it must exist.
Only the individual should decide their healthcare.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
148. Only when asshole men try to keep women from getting them.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 06:45 PM
Mar 2012

The procedure itself; it's just like any other medical procedure and it's none of my concern if a woman chooses this option. It's her right, and it should be provided like any other procedure.

And politicians need to SHUT THE FUCK UP about it.

bitchkitty

(7,349 posts)
157. As a recovering Catholic, abortion does bother me.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:16 PM
Mar 2012

But you know what bothers me more? Men trying to tell women what they can do with their bodies. My choice, were I to get pregnant, would be not to abort. But I can't make that choice for other women.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
161. It's irrelevant
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:37 PM
Mar 2012

The only time it has mattered was when I had a choice to make about my body ... and the choices I have made are nobody's damned business

 

Pornograph

(2 posts)
169. It does make just a little bit queasy, I was probably a Jain in a former life..
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 09:21 PM
Mar 2012

don't even kill a spider if I can capture it and take it outside but I'd never tell any woman she can't have freedom of choice. The extent of my "religious" beliefs is a variation on the "golden rule"...don't do something to someone else you wouldn't want done to you. It's a very slight but significantly different way to state it, I think.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
178. Personally
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:18 AM
Mar 2012

Personally I would n't have an abortion but I wouldn't stop anyone else having one. It's their business. I don't think that any gray haired old man should tell a woman what she can do or can't do.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
180. When a woman has an abortion we never really know the reason why, do we?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:29 AM
Mar 2012

So it is none of our damn business.

varelse

(4,062 posts)
193. when it is done with a coat hanger
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:43 PM
Mar 2012

because the safe, legal, private option has been removed (or isn't affordable).

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
194. Um, being a guy, I dont have any say at all
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:52 PM
Mar 2012

NONE.
I believe that I control MY BODY, and I suck at it so bad.
I shudder to think of the stress of controlling someone else's

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
197. Emotionally, it is hard. But it is often the Rational choice. Heart AND mind.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:28 PM
Mar 2012

Heart AND mind are essential, to being a full human person.

pitohui

(20,564 posts)
198. abortion that late is done to save the life of the mother
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:30 PM
Mar 2012

so while it might make me sad it doesn't make me "queasy," since i have this odd believe than adult woman is a valid human being whose life is worth saving

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
199. I resepct your question, it never has to be black or white. I also respect a womens right to choose
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:41 PM
Mar 2012

..and if I had any REAL say in the matter it would be around the time the brain starts to develop sub conscience

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
200. sex selections. however nothing bothers me enough to legislate it
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 05:44 PM
Mar 2012

late term abortions are needed to protect the health of the mother. there are good arguments to be made, that a child born into a family who doesn't want it for its gender, maybe better off aborted as a fetus.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When if ever does abortio...