General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen if ever does abortion make you uncomfortable/uneasy?
Thought this would be an interesting topic to bring up considering the current legislative attack that seems to be taking place. This may not be popular, but for me personally, my point is around the 5 month mark. At that point you've got a functioning nervous system, thumb sucking, facial expressions, etc. Before that it's just a group of cells so it doesn't bother me. Just curious about other opinions.
we can do it
(12,190 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The only person in a position to make a decision is the woman who is pregnant.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)place to tell others who are in a different position what to do. I am sure they do not make the decision lightly. I thank god I never had to be in that position. You never know what you will do. But it is up to the woman plain and simple. It is her body.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)IphengeniaBlumgarten
(328 posts)It seems to be that abortion should be a private matter involving the woman, her partner, her doctor, and, perhaps, if she wants, her spiritual advisor.
We have gone astray when we think it is the business of legislators or posters to a newsgroup to judge her decision.
randome
(34,845 posts)Regressives often point out how biology has favored men but when it comes to women's biology, we think we should have a say.
Utter nonsense.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Nobody 'likes' abortion. But there can be many reasons -including a woman's health or some other situation which makes it her only viable option.
I wish more younger women would place healthy children up for adoption rather than aborting the fetuses but it is not my right to decide for other individuals or their families.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)we can do it
(12,190 posts)just wow
randome
(34,845 posts)It's still a woman's body and she should have absolute control over what to do with said body.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)alittlelark
(18,890 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)The poster seemed to indicate that there was no point that could be given where they would be uncomfortable.
Neue Regel
(221 posts)Dr. Kermit Gosnell, a Philadelphia doctor, faces eight counts of murder in the deaths of a woman following a botched abortion at his office, along with the deaths of seven babies who, prosecutors allege, were born alive following illegal late-term abortions and were then killed with scissors, reports CBS affiliate KYW.
Gosnell, 69, made millions of dollars over 30 years, performing as many illegal, late-term abortions as he could, prosecutors said. State regulators ignored complaints about him and failed to visit or inspect his clinic since 1993, but no charges were warranted against them, District Attorney Seth Williams said.
Gosnell "induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord," Williams said.
"There were bags and bottles holding aborted fetuses were scattered throughout the building," Williams said. "There were jars, lining shelves, with severed feet that he kept for no medical purpose."
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)a doctor in any sense of the word. He was a sociopathic criminal. The article shows him to be a demented man.
Neue Regel
(221 posts)In response to being asked if you were okay with a baby being aborted one day before birth. Clearly there was at least one doctor who was willing to do what you said "no doctor in this country would do."
Kermit Gosnell went to medical school and was licensed by the state of Pennsylvania. He was clearly a doctor. You can't claim he wasn't a "real" doctor just because his actions leave a less-than-favorable impression.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)They were 'real' doctors too. They were also sociopaths.
If that Doctor had chosen another profession he would STILL be a sociopathic serial killer.
You are picking nits.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)A good example of what laws are meant to prevent. You did see " illegal" in what you posted, right?
Now, find us a legitimate doctor who would do that legally. I'll wait and check back later to see if you can find one.
Neue Regel
(221 posts)He operated a clinic in the middle of a neighborhood. You're using the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy. He doesn't fit your idea of a doctor so he's not a "real" doctor. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
You'd be surprised at how little oversight there actually is. See here, for example:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-01-30-abortion-clinics-oversight_N.htm
Yet Delaware regulators cannot say if Atlantic Women's Medical Center where Gosnell worked one day a week for a number of years suffers from similar health and safety deficiencies because abortion providers are not subject to the kind of routine sanitary and safety inspections that restaurants, beauty salons and tattoo parlors get.
Abortion clinics do not fall under the definition of medical facilities in the state that require routine inspections, like free-standing surgery centers, according to the Delaware Division of Public Health.
The state's Division of Professional Regulation, meanwhile, only investigates complaints against doctors, "not facilities," said Division Director James Collins.
Mark A. Meister Sr., executive director of the Medical Society of Delaware, said he did not know of any agency in the state that regulates abortion clinics or similar medical clinic facilities in Delaware, which he conceeded was "hard to believe."
"You are asking an excellent question," he said. "The answer may be at this point in time there is no regulatory authority over a clinic or organization like that."
More at the link
But go ahead, keep on believing that abortion clinics are held to a high standard of safety, cleanliness, and ethical behavior. Pennsylvania didn't inspect any abortion clinics for 15 years because it was too politically sensitive a topic.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)doing was highly illegal, as well as unhygienic and dangerous, he was a back alley abortionist. You do understand that term does not mean people doing illegal abortions only in back alleys, right?
Is this conversation about what is legal or what is illegal, since you bring up those breaking the law?
I never said he is not a "real" doctor. I said he is a back alley abortionist. Doing unhygienic, illegal abortions, hiding what he did, charging a shitload. Yes, is he is a "real" doctor, also a murderer.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)It's STILL her decision over what to do with HER body.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)So my feelings on the matter, as much as they might be taken into account, do not REQUIRE being taken into account since it's not my body that is involved.
The very first point should be made that a woman can do whatever she wants to do with her own body as regards pregnancy. After that is settled, then we can talk about men's feelings. Until then, no, there is no point at which I would feel uncomfortable with a woman making a decision about her own body.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)worth really? Nothing.
randome
(34,845 posts)But it doesn't quite hold up. You CAN do something to influence politics and wars. And you CAN try to influence what a woman decides to do with her body.
But any conversation that approaches that subject should start from, at a minimum, the absolute bedrock principle that it is always a woman's final decision and no one else's.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Not sure how much if any influence we have over those anymore.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)With wars, you do have that right.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)no. It wouldn't bother me.
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)And then the next second, we're good Catholics? Condemning any abortion after the day of conception?
Much of the original law allowing abortion set a limit: beginning of 3rd trimester. Seems reasonable.
I will only accept that statement if women also took full control of the child when its born. You cannot eat your cake and have it.
randome
(34,845 posts)If a man impregnates a woman, he is taking that risk. If he doesn't want a child, he should make damned sure he doesn't get her pregnant.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)obamanut2012
(26,092 posts)for women;s health.
It doesn;t make me uncomfortable at all.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)Pregnancy and childbirth have a much higher rate of mortality and adverse health consequences than either abortion or not being pregnant do.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)After all, we are all pro choice here, aren't we?
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)I've explained why I make my distinctions. I find it hard to believe that people are completely blase up until birth, but I could be wrong.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)"There might be cake!"
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)It's an open discussion.
The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)But this one looks like an all-nighter....
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)smokey nj
(43,853 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)the argument was established in sweden when abortion came into law. The percentage of women mortality during pregnancy. Also women mortality because of illegal abortions. The younger the female, the higher mortality rate. Also, if a woman is in her late thirties, forties-higher percentage of complications.
We had a case in california, I believe it was in the early nineties. A woman who was pregnant was in an accident. The doctor informed her family that she would have a better chance of surviving if she aborted. The family agreed. But, an anti-abortion male lawyer stopped the procedure just long enough that the woman and fetus were dead.
It is not the government's place to decide-it is the woman's, her doctor, her family's-but not the government.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Teeth cleaning is a legal dental procedure for the patient's health. Does this mean that someone who gets their teeth cleaned is unhealthy?
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)There may be complications with pregnancy and it may go very smoothly.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Not cleaning your teeth may result in tooth and gum disease. Not getting an abortion may result in physical and/or emotional dis-ease.
Either way, doing something to remain healthy does not mean you were unhealthy to start with.
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Many medical/health procedures are performed on healthy persons
It is not necessary to be sick, to benefit from many common medical/health procedures
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)they are a sad thing that should be MINIMIZED.
That is why all rational people support sex education and responsible birth (and disease) control.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)I admit that I am not always bothered by it. Early on it is not much more than a collection of cells.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)What is your purpose stirring this pot?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Or should we only discuss issues that we all agree on?
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)someone is shit disturbing.
Example when I posted that NO ONE wanted abortions to happen; the OP answered that some did.
That is a lie in my opinion and is an example of stirring the pot with the objective is disrupting and creating shit.
Notice the way the topic of sex education and contraception for the purpose of MINIMIZING the unfortunate cases of abortion is ignored.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Vincardog
8. Always. No one WANTS abortions. The women who have them are not HAPPY about it
they are a sad thing that should be MINIMIZED.
That is why all rational people support sex education and responsible birth (and disease) control.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=373829
Not according to some of the other posters.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Heck, I want them to end pregnancies early on. They are an important contraceptive tool. I may be uncomfortable with it in the later months, but that is just my opinion.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)I want all unwanted pregnancies to be avoided thru proper use of birth control.
but that is just my opinion.
WTF is up with that?
sinkingfeeling
(51,469 posts)Long ago, my birth control failed while I was taking the drug methotrexate (yes the same one in the news, used to treat cancers). Look up the side effects of becoming pregnant while on the drug. I elected to have an abortion. I have absolutely zero regrets about that decision. Never had any regrets. Yes, it was a sad and painful experience that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy, but necessary.
TBF
(32,083 posts)back when it was experimental (in the 80s) at least for this disease. I was cautioned before I went on Humira, as he was with Methotrexate, that getting pregnant while on the drug would be highly inadvisable. I am in my 40s and have been blessed with two children so the decision was easy for me - I take birth control now. Thank heaven it exists and I have access to it.
After seeing a sonogram of my son at about 3 months (maybe a little earlier - date uncertain), it would be very difficult to have the procedure. But it should be every woman's choice and I stand with the folks who are pro-choice and advocating birth control.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)My point was that in every case I am aware of Abortion was a choice that women made as the "best" of poor options.
That is what I meant by "no one WANTS an abortion.
The OP is implying that you or others purposefully created the conditions SO you could have an abortion.
As if the abortion in and of itself was a desirable thing rather than a sad necessity.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=276069
In the thread in which these posts appear I was expressing my wish that contraception would be so widely available, and widely used, along with sex education, that unwanted pregnancies would be rare, so abortions would be rare. In other words, I would prefer people to use condoms than have abortions.
And I am still baffled that DUers would take exception to this.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Abortions need to be as rare as they are needed. Like cholecystectomies. As they are needed, they should be done. Legally. Hygienically.
The "use condoms than have abortions" statement seems to indicate that a majority of women who have abortions decided simply to not use condoms, would prefer having an abortion than using a condom.
Yes, there are those who get pregnant because they don't use contraception, but "use a condom rather than have an abortion" is condescending.
And "rare" is too vague a term, too subjective. Abortions should be available as needed, safe, legal, hygienic.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and especially programs that distribute condoms for free.
I am in favor of this because it will lead to fewer unwanted pregnancies and a reduction in STDs.
This point of view really should not be controversial.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)eShirl
(18,496 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)No one needs to pay the slightest bit of attention, let alone deference to it. It is the one thing you may be sure no one facing a choice in this matter will be concerned with in the slightest.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)I have opinions on all things in the heavens and on Earth.
The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)How it leaves you time to trot out tired old wheezes like this is a wonderment....
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)"Children make the best opponents at scrabble, as they are both easy to beat and fun to cheat."
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)So you, "snake," are a Christian? Snaking surreptiously into DU with allegedly high moral purpose?
Personally, I've always been troubled however by that biblical command: to be sly as a snake. That always seemed to conflict with the rest of the Bible. That pictured snakes as being from the devil himself.
Any quick thoughts, in passing, on this curious subject? Without going too far afield or off topic?
RZM
(8,556 posts)One is the notion of regret, meaning women who have one and then later wish they hadn't. I think that comparatively few women who considered abortion and then rejected the idea would say years later that they wished they had aborted their child (though I'm sure there are a few). But I have known people who had abortions in their teenage years and then regretted that decision. One woman I met about 10 years after her abortion. When we talked about it, I could tell that she really wished she hadn't done it. She really wasn't over it and it caused her a lot of pain and sadness. I thought that was unfortunate.
Another difficult scenario is when the prospective parents disagree about whether or not an abortion should be performed. I do feel sympathy for men who wish to have a child but are overruled by their partner's desire for an abortion. Obviously in such situations the decision must rest with the woman alone, but I imagine it would be very difficult for a man who wants to be a father to be powerless in that situation. It should be a woman's choice but I disagree with any argument that would tell a man in such situation to sit down, shut up, and take it without complaining. The emotional pain in such a situation would be very difficult, but unfortunately, there's no real way around it. That's why partners must discuss this thing ahead of time and come to an understanding before a child is conceived.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)You make good points.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I've a friend who did this. She was going to get one at 8 weeks and ran into the local anti-choicers. She canceled her appointment and ended up getting one several weeks later. She said she realized that it was the best decision for her and really resented those who emotionally manipulated her into putting it off as the later term one was much more difficult all the way around.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)when I'm standing at a clinic, nose to nose with a pack of rabid nutjobs waving signs and leaking hatred and pious insanity from the eyes, and I'm wondering which one(s) has the gun.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Greybnk48
(10,170 posts)PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)When women die from botched, illegal procedures brought about by holier than thou polititians and bible-beaters.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)In general I am uncomfortable that so many fetus' with Down's Syndrome are aborted. The people I know with Down's are very happy and seem to enjoy being alive.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)My wife and I are discussing what we would do if the amnio shows something.
randome
(34,845 posts)But what happens if you disagree on what to do? From my point of view, your wife has veto power over your wishes and, in my humble opinion, you should accept that.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)My wife and I make our decisions together. That is kinda the point of being married.
randome
(34,845 posts)There is nothing wrong with discussion and trying to come to a decision together. But in the event of a tie, it's the woman's call, in my book.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)We have pretty much agreed that it is 50/50 and if we disagree then we will both plead our cases and see what happens. Usually there are points that one has considered and the other has not.
Lars39
(26,110 posts)during pregnancy, labor and delivery.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)We always find a way to come to a mutual decision. Tough to explain.
She's a mentalist though (therapist) so she may just be using some mentalism on me.
JSnuffy
(374 posts)...
You might not think it should be that way but it absolutely can happen.
Morning Dew
(6,539 posts)That's how I'd go about my family planning decisions.
sinkingfeeling
(51,469 posts)there is a face or thumb sucking or something, that really doesn't apply in the decision making process that women (and women alone) go through. What counts beyond the first trimester, is what the pregnancy is doing to the woman's body or the health/ future wellbeing of the fetus and the mother. Decisions on whether or not to end the pregnancy are private.
LeftishBrit
(41,208 posts)I think that, except for exceptional circumstances (severe threat to mother's life or health; baby would be born with terminal illness such as Tay-Sachs, etc.; late-reported incest or rape), abortions should not be performed after 24 weeks, when foetuses may become viable outside the womb. However, this is almost irrelevant, as hardly any abortions ARE performed after 24 weeks, or even after 20 weeks, except under such exceptional circumstances.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)And view it as a medical issue.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)I am older and that may explain it.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)They aren't fooling anyone with it, either.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Yet you want one.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)You can't try to open up a discussion about complicated topics and feelings without getting accused of something. Some people have made some very honest answers like sex selection and down's syndrome, but they are far and few in-between.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)on it? You want very honest answers and so do I.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)sensitive these days considering war is being waged on women.
randome
(34,845 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Anyone's opinion of the matter of abortion, if and when they feel uncomfortable is of no matter to anyone for any reason other than the person directly affected.
At what level do you get uncomfortable about sexually abusing children?
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)affect.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)When you get an reply that you dislike, annihilate everything.
No, you are garnering some responses in this thread questioning your real intent, and you don't seem to care for that turn of events.
It happens here all the time, get used to it.
That, too, is part of DU whether you like it or not.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"You can't try to open up a discussion about complicated topics and feelings without getting accused of something..."
Yes... of course you may do that. It simply needs to predicated on sincerity rather than on the obvious and the disingenuous...
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Are only anti-abortion remarks honest in your opinion?
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)And if you don't mind most of us are fed-up with strangers inserting themselves into the most private areas of our lives. The constant demand that complete strangers have the right to make decisions for us isn't just maddening, its also alarming.
I know you say that this is about a decsion that you and your wife may have to make, but we are very used to those that are hostile to women approaching a subject in just the same manner that you have.
If you need the counsel of friends, please seek them out.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)among doctors who do tend to also draw that line. But it's not a line drawn in stone.
Most OB/GYNs do not like the idea of performing an abortion after 24 weeks for many reasons, and many will refuse. There are some that do not refuse, but in most cases, a doctor will try to find out what the reason for the request is and do their best to inform the patient of any possible side-effects. They may even attempt to dissuade the patient either out of 'discomfort' or simple concern for the patient herself. As doctors have a duty to mitigate harm, the notion of aborting a viable fetus can be uncomfortable.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Considering your ability to regenerate .
Great post in all seriousness though.
The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)I had forgotten how much I liked Chris Eccleston as The Doctor. Probably in the minority on that one.
Mariana
(14,859 posts)We were heartbroken that he only did it for one season.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)They are about controlling women.
The subtext is, how uncomfortable does the idea of sexually active women make you?
Abortions make me uncomfortable when they are not safe, legal and accessible. Any other consideration is not about abortion but about social control of women's agency.
The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)In fact I think they should be moreso.
adigal
(7,581 posts)I cannot think of any reason to abort, rather than have a birth, labor can be induced with pitocin.
ecstatic
(32,720 posts)Many babies can survive in the NICU at that point, and so many people would love to adopt. I think abortions should be done early on, but I don't plan to force my view on anyone else.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)do so because it is either a health risk to the mother, to a twin who is developing normally when one is not (to save the one developing normally) or because the baby has no chance of surviving outside the womb. It's not an easy procedure to arrange and to heap guilt on mothers who in almost every case wanted the child but had legitimate health reasons to go that route is sad.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)This often gets tossed around as a reason why a woman with an unwanted pregnancy "should" carry to term and give birth. It strikes me as regarding women as nothing more than "brood mares." If a woman who has an unwanted pregnancy wishes to give birth and give the child up for adoption, that is her decision. But to withhold her right to choose a termination on the grounds that some other woman can't conceive and wants to adopt is obnoxious.
MH1
(17,600 posts)There are other factors, too. The child WILL want to contact their biological mother at some point. Giving birth entails a lifetime connection that might not be wanted.
That said, I want contraception widely available and widely used so that abortions are rarely needed; and for abortion to be widely and easily accessible in the earliest stage of pregnancy, so 'late-term abortion' will be a consideration that doesn't even have to be made except for late-term complications and other extremely rare situations. Not because I have a problem with abortion (I don't) but because some people do, and thus make it difficult for the person having an abortion.
Ironically (and I think intentionally by some), the efforts to suppress contraception and access to abortion, make late(r)-term abortions more likely in more cases.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)had a pregnancy and were unmarried and they brought the pregnancy to term and gave up the baby for adoption. This therapist said these women struggled all their lives with that decision and even remembered the child when every birthday rolled around. They were miserable over the experience of going through a pregnancy and given birth, only to have the baby taken away in the hospital, some times sight unseen by the birth mother.
The right to lifers never talk about these women and the suffering they went through when they went through their traumas.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I have four sisters and lots of girl friends and I have NEVER heard of anyone who elected to abort after 24 weeks unless the life of the mother was at stake. I mean really, have you ever been pregnant? 24 weeks is the 6 month mark, a pregnancy is 280 days or 10 lunar months, who carries a fetus 24 weeks and then just decides to abort? I've never heard of anyone doing that, the late term abortion myth by choice is just that, a MYTH.
ecstatic
(32,720 posts)didn't say how often it happens, etc., and most importantly, I said it was MY opinion--not something I would hold anyone else to.
Dokkie
(1,688 posts)I rather see a kid get aborted that have him/her grow up with a parent that doesnt want him/her. Life is hard enough as it is, lets not make it anymore more complicated by prevent women from using abortion.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)The first trimester, it's up to the woman, second is a little more problematic but should be determined by the status of the fetus and the health of the mother, third trimester if medically indicated. Since it has been forty years, maybe the medical information about viability and medical necessity have changed but from what I know, the general time frame has not.
But no matter WHEN during the pregnancy and abortion might be considered it should ALWAYS be a decision made between a woman and her doctor without government interference.
saras
(6,670 posts)First, it's not my business unless it's my body.
Second, it's something that happens in context. Middle-class America isn't anywhere near my standards of good or normal. So everything there is a horrible compromise at best. We live in a world where nearly everything about consumer capitalism appears bizarrely corrupt, dysfunctional, and insane to me, so it's always necessary for me to think my way though these things. American cliche emotions don't work for me - the entire set of pre-neocon European attitudes towards sex seem hugely more grounded and sensible, although they are getting beaten down by corporatism too. So the entire issue appears, to me, utterly manufactured by the neocons, starting in the early seventies in rejection of feminism, civil rights, sexual liberation, and personal liberty, among other things.
For example, I don't buy the argument that infanticide coarsens people, unless it's something you're doing on the side, in a culture that disapproves of it in practice as well as in talk, for fun. In the real world, the fact that it's happening indicates that culturally, people are already at that level, and it's the CAUSES of that that need to change. In that world, it's incredibly UNlikely that being "more moral" about infanticide will change the rest of society in the necessary direction.
Or in blunter language, if you live somewhere that people all around you are so desperate that they have to kill babies, and killing infants seems normal, NOT killing the babies is not going to help your odds of survival. It's a good result to desire, but creating an individual example of the result exerts no force back on the governing situation.
If you live somewhere that you need abortions, whether because of ignorant sex, coerced sex, failure of birth control, or some other reason, NOT having that abortion is not going to change the causes of your ignorance, the forces that coerced you, the quality of birth control available, or in most cases, whatever else it was that motivated you. If you want to get rid of abortions, make them unnecessary without judging what people do to make them unnecessary.
The dominionist belief, on the other hand, is that the problem is original sin on the part of the woman, and the appropriate interim action until the Second Coming is that men control the women and the women suffer, both as God commands. They assert that having, and raising, the baby is deserved punishment. More liberal fundies believe that the problem is ignorance on the part of the woman, and that the experience of having and raising the baby will somehow be educational for the mother. Note that the fate of the baby is not a significant concern in either position. Original sin and all that.
Iggo
(47,561 posts)Almost always, they're looking for something to attack.
And so no, I'm not going there.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Took a drive through bible belt country last weekend. Saw an anti-abortion sign every two or three miles. By the twentieth or so I blurted out, "Jesus Fucking Christ what is wrong with these sick fuckers and their obsession with abortion?!?"
The 15 year old next to me, and with whom I almost never talk politics, replied, "I was thinking the same thing. This is just weird."
And it is. Where does this shit come from? They are absolutely obsessed with abortion. They seem to drink, eat and breathe abortion. They must spend every waking moment thinking about abortion. And probably dreaming of abortions all night.
I grew up in that part of the country in the '60s and '70s. There was *none* of this back then. Seriously. Where does this weird ass shit come from?
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Where this weird ass shit comes from mystifies me. I wanted to shoot everyone of those fucking billboards.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)is getting abortions instead of having babies!
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)ingac70
(7,947 posts)Why can't people MYOB?
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Abortions should be safe, legal and RARE. Birth control should be free and available. Whatever my personal feelings are on the issue don't matter, what matters is I have no right to make decisions for someone else.
And anyone who thinks "abstinence education" works is an idiot. Sex is one of the great joys in life. If "God" didn't want me having sex all the time he would have made it feel miserable.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)The games you can play while you wait your turn, the treats you can make, all are wonderful fun! Jello jigglers in the shape of fetuses. Spaghetti with placenta shaped meatballs. Pin the penis on the random stranger. Musical wombs. What fun!
My friends so look forward to these parties that they go have unprotected sex with random strangers hoping to be able to participate!
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)You rock!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)And lunch at the club, of course, with the other "girls."
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Their obsession with this issue is turning them into a parody of themselves.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)Pants, too!
Scout
(8,624 posts)izquierdista
(11,689 posts)For an uncomplicated pregnancy. If you have a woman who is 6 months along and healthy, her inquiring about an abortion could signal something else going wrong: abusive or recently absconded spouse, depression, economic problems, stress, etc.
Of course, Republicans aren't going to ante up one thin dime to address these other possible problems, they "just say NO!"
While she is the ultimate 'decider', there should be enough of a safety net so that she can be sure that life is not going to get a lot worse for her if she carries to term.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)that some people don't truly understand that it's entirely possible to be uneasy (or squeamish) about something and...at the same time hold absolutely NO judgement toward others for whatever they do.
The whole idea of abortion does make me uneasy. I almost had one back in 1974, but could not go through with it.
HOWEVER...
and this is the important part...
that does not mean I have the right to tell someone else what she can or cannot do.
Too many people live in a black/white...either/or world and don't know that it's possible to have very mixed feelings about a lot of issues.
So the bottom line here is...
I could not do it. Other women should be free to do what I could not.
And I would never judge them.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Texasgal
(17,046 posts)about YOUR body! It's none of MY business.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)other than that, I will defer to the woman in whom the pregnancy is taking place. Every time.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Hero for the day! YEAH Warren.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's not a fucking picnic for anyone.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)But that's FOR ME. That's what being pro-choice is all about. It's about a woman's personal choice and it's no one else's business.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)decides that they need to decide what a woman does with her body. It's very easy to solve this problem, if you don't want an abortion or don't believe they should be done, don't have one. But no one has a right to tell any woman that she can't have one if she wants or needs one.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Valid, peer-reviewed, legal medical procedures which someone else may engage of their own accord do not make me feel uneasy as long as the doctor is competent.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)or when a young girl begs her boyfriend to beat her with a bat hoping to induce one.
And whenever women feel they must use it to please their boyfriends who can't be bothered to use condoms.
ladywnch
(2,672 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)No more of an issue than cutting ones toenails.
A late abortion, on the other hand, is ending a human life. A very different proposition, and a much bigger deal, even when there is a very good reason for carrying it out. I don't think anyone can be completely indifferent to ending a human life, even when it is done for the best of reasons.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)tledford
(917 posts)...but it's none of my FUCKING BUSINESS as I'm not the pregnant woman!
Sheesh!
kelly1mm
(4,734 posts)with any genetic selection based abortions. I could see the day if/when the genetic markers for sexual orientation are identifible, and some people wishing to terminate LGTG pregnancies. Those things do bother me.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)kelly1mm
(4,734 posts)genetic manipulation bothers me.
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)often Down syndrome.
The basic problem is that the counseling* women recieve after such a test result is all about how miserable and horrible life with a Down's child is, giving them a hard nudge in the direction of choosing abortion.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But I also respect her choice if she chooses to terminate the pregnancy.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)No Exceptions, No Apologies.
I had an abortion at 23 weeks. Had I not had the abortion, I would
be dead.
Thank you for your concern.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)to abortion due to rape to be outright disgusting.
My mother does not like the idea of abortion, though she understands why it must exist.
Only the individual should decide their healthcare.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)The procedure itself; it's just like any other medical procedure and it's none of my concern if a woman chooses this option. It's her right, and it should be provided like any other procedure.
And politicians need to SHUT THE FUCK UP about it.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)It's a private decision between a woman and her doctor - including 3rd trimester abortions.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)But you know what bothers me more? Men trying to tell women what they can do with their bodies. My choice, were I to get pregnant, would be not to abort. But I can't make that choice for other women.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)The only time it has mattered was when I had a choice to make about my body ... and the choices I have made are nobody's damned business
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)until then it's none of my fucking business
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)It should be every woman's individual choice.
Pornograph
(2 posts)don't even kill a spider if I can capture it and take it outside but I'd never tell any woman she can't have freedom of choice. The extent of my "religious" beliefs is a variation on the "golden rule"...don't do something to someone else you wouldn't want done to you. It's a very slight but significantly different way to state it, I think.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Personally I would n't have an abortion but I wouldn't stop anyone else having one. It's their business. I don't think that any gray haired old man should tell a woman what she can do or can't do.
jillan
(39,451 posts)So it is none of our damn business.
donheld
(21,311 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)varelse
(4,062 posts)because the safe, legal, private option has been removed (or isn't affordable).
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)NONE.
I believe that I control MY BODY, and I suck at it so bad.
I shudder to think of the stress of controlling someone else's
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)phylny
(8,383 posts)but for others? Not my business.
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Heart AND mind are essential, to being a full human person.
pitohui
(20,564 posts)so while it might make me sad it doesn't make me "queasy," since i have this odd believe than adult woman is a valid human being whose life is worth saving
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)..and if I had any REAL say in the matter it would be around the time the brain starts to develop sub conscience
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)late term abortions are needed to protect the health of the mother. there are good arguments to be made, that a child born into a family who doesn't want it for its gender, maybe better off aborted as a fetus.